Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Delayed repair of obstetric-related anal sphincter injury remains problematic, and perineal wound breakdown is common. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome after overlap anal sphincter repair and to determine the advantages, if any, of a posterior fourchette incision (n=18) compared with a conventional perineal incision (n=32). METHODS: Fifty females of mean parity 2.8 (standard deviation, 1.6) underwent repair in a five-year period. The mean follow-up was 23 months. Assessment was by anal vector manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and continence scoring. RESULTS: Functional outcomes were similar in the two groups. Repair increased squeeze-pressure increment and improved continence scores in both groups. Postoperative wound complications were fewer when a posterior fourchette incision was used compared with a perineal incision (11 vs. 44 percent, respectively;P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed anal sphincter repair improves continence. A posterior fourchette approach is associated with fewer postoperative wound complications without compromising the quality of repair and the functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talley NJ, O'Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton JL III. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 1992;102:895–901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995;274:559–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johanson JJ, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:33–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308:887–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford LA, Quint EH, Pearl ML, DeLancey JO. Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:527–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Helwig JT, Thorp JM Jr, Bowes WA Jr. Does midline episiotomy increase the risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations in operative vaginal deliveries? Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:276–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. A prospective study of anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Donnelly VS, Fynes M, Campbell DM, Johnson H, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:955–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzpatrick M, Fynes M, Cassidy M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A prospective study of the influence of parity and operative technique on the outcome of primary sphincter repair following obstetrical injury. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;89:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donnelly V, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. The influence of oestrogen replacement on fecal continence in post menopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:311–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991;78:448–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 1993;34:685–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nielson MB, Hauge C, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management. Am J Radiol 1993;160:771–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994;81:1231–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keighley MR, Fielding FW. Management of faecal incontinence and results of surgical treatment. Br J Surg 1983;70:463–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira L, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1996;83:502–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parks AG, McPartlin JF. Late repair of injuries of the anal sphincter. Proc R Soc Med 1971;64:1187–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams N, Barlow J, Hobson A, Scott N, Irving M. Manometric asymmetry in the anal canal in controls and patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1275–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perry RE, Blantchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Attwood SE. Manometric diagnosis of anal sphincter injuries. Am J Surg 1990;159:112–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fynes M, Cassidy M, O'Herlihy C, O'Connell PR. Anal vector volume analysis complements endoanal ultrasound assessment of post partum anal sphincter injury. Br J Surg 2000;87:1209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartram CI, Sultan AH. Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence. Gut 1995;37:4–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:482–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzpatrick M, Fynes M, Cassidy M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Prospective study of the influence of parity and operative technique on the outcome of primary anal sphincter repair following obstetrical injury. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;89:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fynes M, Donnelly VS, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A prospective study of the effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence. Lancet 1999;354:983–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arnaud A, Sarles JC, Sielezneff I, Orsoni P, Joly A. Sphincter repair without overlapping for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:744–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schoetz DJ. Operative therapy for anal incontinence. Surg Clin North Am 1985;65:35–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baig MK, Wexner SD. Factors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2000;87:1316–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000;355:260–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Slade MS, Goldberg SM, Schottler JL, Balcos EG, Christenson CE. Sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1977;20:33–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, Herman FN, Goldberg SM, Rothenberger DA. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:720–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Melia M. Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;58:703–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland

    Maybelle Tan M.B., Deirdre M. O'Hanlon M.D. (F.R.C.S.(Gen), Mary Cassidy R.G.N. &  P. Ronan O'Connell M.D. (F.R.C.S.I.)

Authors
  1. Maybelle Tan M.B.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deirdre M. O'Hanlon M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary Cassidy R.G.N.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Ronan O'Connell M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, M., O'Hanlon, D.M., Cassidy, M. et al. Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1624–1629 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234382

Key words

Search

Navigation