Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of shading on associative N2 fixation

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of reduced solar radiation on associative N2-fixation and plant parameters was studied in three field experiments (1978–80). ‘Gahi-3’ pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Monch.) field plots were shaded with saran shade cloth that reduced solar radiation by 50% and 75%. Acetylene reduction activity (ARA) was reduced by shading in one of the three experiments. The two non-responding experiments were conducted on a wall-drained, low-activity site (ARA means ranging 17–68 n moles ethylene core−1 h−1), the responding experiment was conducted on a poorly drained, high-ARA site.

Shading affected the plants drastically, reducing fresh weight and dry matter yields up to 46% (50% shade) and 57% (75% shade). Shading also reduced dry matter percentage from 19.6 (no shade) to 15.3 (75% shade) and increased nitrogen content from 0.6% (no shade) to 1.53% (75% shading). However, shading did not affect protein yield. Inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense had no measurable effect on yield or acetylene reduction in the first two experiments.

In the third experiment, shading reduced mean ARA of inoculated plots over 100% but had no significant effect on control plots. Inoculation significantly increased ARA in the nonshaded plots but not in shaded plots. Acetylene reduction activity was high, with means ranging between 208 and 465 n moles ethylene evolved core−1 h−1. Soil moisture and millet growth stage also affected acetylene reduction activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecht S L, Okon Y and Burris R H 1977 Effects of light and temperature on the association betweenZea mays andSpirillum lipoferum. Plant Physiol 60, 528–531.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balandreau J, Ducerf P, Hamad-Fares I Weinhard P, Rinaudo G, Miller C and Dommergues Y 1978 Limiting factors in grass nitrogen fixation.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation in the Tropics. Eds. J Dobereiner et al. pp 275–303, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouton J H, Smith R L, Schank S C, Burton G W, Tyler M E Littell R C, Gallaher R N and Quesenberry K A 1979 Response of pearl millet inbred and hybrids to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense. Crop Sci. 19, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen E, Okon Y, Kigel J, Nur I and Henis Y 1980 Increase in dry weight and total nitrogen content inZea mays andSetaria italica associated with nitrogen-fixingAzospirillum spp. Plant Physiol. 66, 746–749.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Day J M, Neves M C P, and Dobereiner F 1975 Nitrogenase activity on the roots of tropical forage grasses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 7, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dobereiner J and Day J M 1976 Associative symbioses in tropical grasses: Characterization of microorganisms and dinitrogen-fixing sites. pp 518–538.In Proceedings of The First International Symposium on Nitrogen Fixation. Eds. W E Newton and C J Nyman. Vol. 2 Washington State Univ. Press, Pullman, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallaher R N, Weldon C O and Boswell F C 1976 A semiautomated procedure for total nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40, 887–889.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kapulnik Y, Sarig S, Nur I, Okon Y, Kigel J and Henis Y 1980 Yield increases in summer cereal crops in Israeli fields inoculated withAzospirillum. Expl. Agric. 17, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee K J and Gaskins M H 1983 Increased root exudation of14C-compounds by sorghum seedlings inoculated with nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Plant and Soil (In press).

  10. Matthews S W Schank S C, Aldrich H C and Smith R L 1983 Peroxidase-antiperoxidase labelling ofAzospirillum brasilense in field-grown pearl millet. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 697–703.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neyra C A and Dobereiner J 1977 Nitrogen fixation in grasses. Adv. Agron. 29, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reynders L and Vlassak K 1982 Use ofAzospirillum brasilense as biofertilizer in intensive wheat cropping. Plant and Soil 66, 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schank S C, Weier K L and MacRae I C 1981 Plant yield and nitrogen content of a digitgrass in response to Azospirilum inoculation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41, 342–345.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith Rex L, Bouton J H, Schank S C, Quesenberry K H, Tyler M E, Milam J R, Gaskins M H and Littell R C 1976 Nitrogen fixation in grasses inoculated withSpirillum lipoferum. Science 193 1003–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith R L, Bouton J H, Schank S C and Quesenberry K H 1977 Yield increases of tropical grain and forage grasses after inoculation withSpirillum lipoferum in Florida. pp 307–311.In Biological N2-fixation in Farming Systems of the Tropics. Eds A Ayanaba and P J Dart. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith R L, Schank S C, Bouton J H and Quesenberry K H 1978 Yield increases of tropical grasses after inoculation withSpirillum lipoferum. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm). 26, 380–385.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith R L, Schank S C, Milam J R and Littell R C 1982 Statewide search for highly active associative N2-fixation systems. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 41, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith Rex L and Schank S C 1980 Factors affecting nitrogenase activity of field grass plots. p 495In Current Perspectives in Nitrogen Fixation. Australian Acad. Sci., 534 p.

  19. Subba Rao N S, Tilak K V B R, Singh C S and Lakshmi-Kumari M 1979 Response of a few species of graminaceous plants to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense. Curr. Sci. 48, 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor R W 1979 Response of two grasses to inoculation withAzospirillum spp. in Bahamian soil. Trop. Agric. 56, 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tien T M, Gaskins M H and Hubbell D H 1979 Plant growth substances produced byAzospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37, 1016–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tyler M E, Milam J R, Smith R L, Schank S C and Zuberer D A 1979 Isolation ofAzospirillum from diverse geographic regions. Can. J. Microbiol. 25 693–697.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Umali-Garcia M, Hubbell D H and Gaskins M H 1978 Process of infection ofPanicum maximum bySpirillum lipoferum Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm). 26, 373–379

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Berkum P and Bohlool B B 1980 Evaluation of nitrogen fixation by bacteria in association with roots of tropical grasses. Microbiol Rev. 44, 491–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Berkum P and Sloger C 1982 Physiology of root-associated nitrogenase activity inOryza sativa. Plant Physiol. 69 1161–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vietor D M 1982 Variation of14C-labeled photosynthate recovery from roots and rooting media of warm season grasses. Crop Sci. 22, 362–366.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Von Bulow J F W and Dobereiner J, 1975 Potential for nitrogen fixation in maize genotypes in Brazil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 2389–2393.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R.L., Schank, S.C. & Littell, R.C. The influence of shading on associative N2 fixation. Plant Soil 80, 43–52 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232938

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232938

Key words

Navigation