Plant and Soil

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 269–278 | Cite as

Sensitivity of Malayan isolates of Fusarium to soil fungistasis

  • D. A. Griffiths
Article

Summary

Spore germination of various isolates of Fusarium (isolated from Malayan sources) was inhibited when placed on cellulose film in contact with soil moistened with distilled water. Intraspecific variations in sensitivity to mycostasis were recorded suggesting physiological differences between isolates of the same species. The addition of glucose frequently masked the mycostatic factor while autoclaving the soil completely removed it. The growth of fungal mycelium in contact with soil followed a similar pattern and when hyphae grew in contact with autoclaved soil sporulation was frequently observed.

The similarities between the results outlined in this investigation and results from different countries is discussed and it is suggested that pathogenic fungi frequently have to overcome soil mycostasis before they can establish themselves in a new environment.

Keywords

Glucose Cellulose Plant Physiology Similar Pattern Fusarium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dobbs, C. G., Bywater, J. and Griffiths, D. A., Studies in soil mycology III. Report on Forest Research for 1959, 94–100. H.M.S.O. London (1960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dobbs, C. G. and Griffiths, D. A., Studies in soil mycology IV. Report on Forest Research for 1960, 87–92. H.M.S.O. London (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dobbs, C. G. and Hinson, W. H., A widespread fungistasis in soils. Nature172, 197–199 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobbs, C. G., Hinson, W. H. and Bywater, J.,In: The Ecology of soil fungi, pp. 130–147. Liverpool University Press, (1960).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffiths, D. A., Vertical distribution of mycostasis in Malayan soils. Can. J. Microbiol. (in press) (1964).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffiths, D. A. and Dobbs, C. G., Relationships between mycostasis and free monosaccharides in soils. Nature199, 4891. 408 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hine, R. B., Saprophytic Growth ofFusarium oxysporum f. niveum in Soil. Phytopathology52, 840–843 (1962).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson, R. M., An investigation of Fungistasis in Nigerian soils. J. Gen. Microbiol.18, 248–258 (1958).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sequeira, L., Influence of organic amendments on survival ofFusarium oxysporum f. cubense in the soil. Phytopathology52, 976–982 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simmonds, P. M., Sallans, B. J. and Ledingham, R. J., The occurrence ofHelminthosporium sativum in relation to primary infections in common root rot of wheat. Sci. Agr.30, 407 (1950).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stover, R. H., Flood fallowing for eradication ofFusarium oxysporum f. cubense. III. Effect of oxygen on fungus survival. Soil Sci.80, 397 (1955).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tousson, T. A. and Snyder, W. C., Germination of chlamydospores ofFusarium solani f. phaeseoli in unsterilised soils. Phytopathology51, 620–623 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winter, A. G., Untersuchungen über den Einfluss biotischer Faktoren auf die Infektion des Weizens durchOphiobolus graminis. Z. Pflanzen krankh.50, 113 (1940).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winter, A. G., Untersuchungen über Vorkommen und Bedeutung von antimikrobiellen und antiphytotischen Substanzen in natürlichen Böden. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Düng.69, 224 (1955).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Griffiths
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpur

Personalised recommendations