Advertisement

The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 97–103 | Cite as

The indirect hemagglutination test for amebiasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

  • George R. Healy
  • Sumner C. Kraft
Article

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the specificity of the indirect hemagglutination (IHA) test in the differential diagnosis of amebiasis and inflammatory bowel disease. Sera from 511 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were tested by the IHA and 6 (1%) were positive. Five were positive at low levels of titers, whereas the sixth specimen had a strong positive reaction. Upon reexamination, the patient furnishing the high titered serum was found to be harboringEntamoeba histolytica. A heterogeneous control group of sera from 147 subjects also was tested and low-level positive IHA titers occurred in 3 (2%). The results indicate that the IHA test for amebiasis is of value as another laboratory procedure for the differential diagnosis of amebiasis and inflammatory bowel diseases.

Keywords

Public Health Differential Diagnosis Inflammatory Bowel Disease Bowel Disease Positive Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kessel JF, Lewis WP, Molina-Pasquel C, et al: Indirect hemagglutination and complement fixation tests in amebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 14:540–551, 1965Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powell SJ, Maddison SE, Wilmot AJ, et al: Amoebic gel diffusion precipitin test. Clinical evaluation in amoebic liver abscess. Lancet 2:602–603, 1965Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Powell SJ: The capillary tube precipitin test. A rapid serologic aid to clinical diagnosis in invasive amebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 17:840–843, 1968Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeanes AL: Evaluation in clinical practice of the fluorescent amoebic antibody test. J Clin Pathol 22:427–429, 1969Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ambroise-Thomas P, Truong TK: Le diagnostic serologique de l'amibase humaine par la technique des anticorps fluorescents. Bull WHO 40:103–112, 1969Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gore RW, Sadun EH: Soluble antigen fluorescent antibody test for amebiasis. Exp Parasitol 22:316–320, 1968Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morris MN, Powell SJ, Elsdon-Dew R: Latex agglutination test for invasive amebiasis. Lancet 1:1362–1363, 1970Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halpern B, Young JJ, Dolkart J, et al: The serologic response of patients with amebiasis compared by gel-diffusion, hemagglutination, and phagocytosis techniques with a commonEntamoeba histolytica antigen preparation. J Lab Clin Med 69:467–471, 1967Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milgram EA, Healy GR, Kagan IG: Studies on the use of the indirect hemagglutination test in the diagnosis of amebiasis. Gastroenterology 50:645–649, 1966Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Healy GR: The use of and limitations to the indirect hemagglutination test in the diagnosis of intestinal amebiasis. Health Lab Sci 5:174–179, 1968Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tupasi TE, Healy GR: Adaptation of the Bozicevich trichinella bentonite flocculation test for the diagnosis of amebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 19:43–48, 1970Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Healy GR: The laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Bull NY Acad Med 47:478–493, 1971Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cuadrado RR, Kagan IG: The prevalence of antibodies to parasitic diseases in sera of young army recruits from the United States and Brazil. Am J Epidemiol 86:330–340, 1967Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Healy GR, Kagan IG, Gleason NN: Use of the indirect hemagglutination test in some studies of seroepidemiology of amebiasis in the Western Hemisphere. Health Lab Sci 7:109–116, 1970Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Juniper K Jr, Minshew MC: The indirect hemagglutination test in amebiasis. Gastroenterology 54:1248, 1968Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis FW Jr: Amebiasis: Experiences in the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1936–1946. Am J Med Sci 217:505–517, 1949Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernhoft WH: The relation of amebic dysentery to chronic ulcerative colitis. NY State J Med 49:1795–1796, 1949Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown CH, Winkelman EI: Amebiasis and ulcerative colitis. Cleve Clin Q 32:61–67, 1965Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fostiropoulos G, Doxiades T: Systemic manifestations of ulcerative colitis. Am J Proctol 17:64–69, 1966Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Powell SJ, Wilmot AJ: Ulcerative post-dysenteric colitis. Gut 7:438–443, 1966Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Powell SJ, Maddison SE, Hodgson RG, et al: Amoebic gel diffusion precipitin test. Clinical evaluation in acute amoebic dysentery. Lancet 1:566–567, 1966Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neal RA, Robinson GL, Lewis WP, et al: Comparison of clinical observations on patients infected withEntamoeba histolytica, with serological titers of their sera and virulence of their amoebae to rats. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 62:69–75, 1968Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindeman RJ, Weinstein L, Levitan R, et al: Ulcerative colitis and intestinal salmonellosis. Am J Med Sci 254:855–861, 1967Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wruble LD, Duckworth JK, Duke DD, et al: Toxic dilatation of the colon in a case of amebiasis. N Engl J Med 275:926–928, 1966Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McAllister TA: Diagnosis of amoebic colitis on routine biopsies from rectum and sigmoid colon. Br Med J 1:362–364, 1962Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Editorial. Amebic infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 275:960–961, 1966Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • George R. Healy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sumner C. Kraft
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.From the US Department of Health, Education and WelfareHealth Services and Mental Administration Center for Disease ControlAtlanta
  2. 2.the Department of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations