Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between the effect of pentagastrin and Histalog on gastric acid secretion

  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fifty subjects with a wide range of maximal gastric secretory output were tested, using Histalog (2.5 mg/kg intramuscularly) as the stimulant on one day and pentagastrin (6 µg/kg subcutaneously) on another day. Gastric output was collected for 2 hours after each injection. The pentagastrin test used in this study gave virtually the same value for 30-minute acid output as the Histalog test and could be shortened to 45 minutes post-injection without loss of accuracy. The side effects of pentagastrin were trivial and transitory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoller JL, Holubitsky IB, Harrison RC, Munro AI: Complications of the Histalog test of gastric acid secretion. Am J Dig Dis 15:647–651, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Makhlouf GM, McManus JPA, Card WI: Action of the pentapeptide (ICI 50 123) on gastric secretion in man. Gastroenterology 51:455–465, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Multicentre Pilot Study: Pentagastrin as a stimulant of maximal gastric acid response in man. Lancet 1:291–295, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konturek SJ: Gastrin-like pentapeptide ICI 50 123:a potent gastric stimulant in man. Am J Dig Dis 12:285–292, 1967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Diem K, Lentner C: Documenta Geigy Scientific Tables. Seventh Edition. Basle, Geigy, 1970

  6. Smillie KW: An Introduction to Regression and Correlation. Toronto, Ryerson Press, 1965, p 27

    Google Scholar 

  7. A Multicentre Study: Intramuscular pentagastrin compared with other stimuli as tests of gastric secretion. Lancet 1:341–343, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston DH, McCraw BH: Gastric analysis: evaluation of collection techniques. Gastroenterology 35:512–516, 1958

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pedersen SA: Pentagastrin as a stimulant in routine clinical testing of gastric acid secretion. Digestion 3:81–89, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liavig I: Comparison between the effect of pentagastrin and histamine on gastric acid secretion. Acta Chir Scand 135:719–722, 1969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wormsley KG, Mahoney MP, Ng M: Effects of a gastrin-like pentapeptide (ICI 50 123) on stomach and pancreas. Lancet 1:993–996, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jepson K, Duthie HL, Fawcett AN, Gumpert JR, Johnston D, Lari J, Wormsley KG: Acid and pepsin response to gastrin, pentagastrin, tetragastrin, histamine and pentagastrin snuff. Lancet 1:139–141, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston D, Jepson K: Use of pentagastrin in a test of gastric acid secretion. Lancet 2:585–588. 1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shearman DJC, Finlayson NDC, Murray-Lyon IM, Samson RR, Girdwood RH: Intrinsic-factor secretion in response to pentagastrin. Lancet 1:192–194, 1967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aubrey DA, Forrest APM: Comparison of the gastric secretory responses following the administration of histamine acid phosphate and pentagastrin by separate continuous intravenous infusions or by a step test method. Scand J Gastroenterol 5:449–457, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Logan CJH, Brick I, Roddie IC: Circulatory effects of a synthetic gastrin-like pentapeptide (ICI 50 123). Lancet 1:999–1000, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cleator, I.G.M., Stoller, J.L., Johnstone, F.R.C. et al. Comparison between the effect of pentagastrin and Histalog on gastric acid secretion. Digest Dis Sci 17, 713–719 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231639

Keywords

Navigation