The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 98–109 | Cite as

Cholecystography and cholangiography

Comparative study of various methods and their relative diagnostic value in hepatobiliary diseases: II
  • Carl P. Steglich
  • Harry B. Perlberg


Public Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Graham, E. A., andCole, W. H. Roentgenologic examination of the gallbladder: Method utilizing the intravenous injection of tetrabromophenolphthalein.J.A.-M.A. 82: 613, 1924.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dohrn, M., andDiedrich, P. Ein neues Roentgenkontrastmittel der Gallenblase.Deutsche med. Wchnschr. 66: 1133, 1940.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morgan, R. H., andStewart, H. B. Clinical experience with Telepaque, a new gallbladder compound.Radiology 58: 231, 1952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rigler, L. G. Cholecystography with Telepaque: A preliminary report.Radiology 58: 524, 1952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Root, J. C., andLewis, F. R. A comparison of a new cholecystographic medium, Teridax, with Telepaque.Radiology 64: 714, 1955.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hornykiewytsch, T., andStender, H. S. Intravenoese Cholangiographie.Fortschr. Geb. Röntgenstrahlen 79: 292, 1953.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frommhold, W. Entwicklung und Fortschritte der Cholezystographie und Cholangiographie.Berliner Gesundheitsbl. 4, Heft 22, 1953.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sachs, M. Visualization of the common duct during cholecystography, its significance.Am. J. Roentgenol. 69: 745, 1953.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grugan, R. A. An oral cholecystographic method using Telepaque with demonstration of the common and eystic ducts.Radiology 61: 633, 1953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hunt, H. B., Hicken, N. F., andBest, R. R. Exploration of biliary ducts by cholangiography during and following operation.Am. J. Roentgenol. 38: 542, 1937.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keil, P. G., andLandis, S. N. Peritoneoscopic cholangiography.A.M.A. Arch. Int. Med. 88: 36, 1951.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ritvo, M., andStauffer, I. A. Gastrointestinal X-ray Diagnosis. Philadelphia, Lea, 1952, pp. 639–657.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leger, L., Zara, M., andArvay, N. Cholangiographie et drainage biliaire par ponction trans-hepatique.Presse med. 60: 936, 1952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frommhold, W. Ein neuartiges Kontrastmittel fuer die intravenoese Cholezystographie.Fortschr. Geb. Röntgenstrahlen 79: 284, 1953.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langecker, H., Harwart, A., andJunkmann, K. 2,4,6-Trijod-3-acetaminobenzoesaeure-Abkoemmlinge als Kontrastmittel.Arch. exper. Path. u. Pharmakol. 220: 195, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott, W. G., andSimril, W. A. Experiences with newer cholecystopaques for oral cholecystography.J. Missouri M.A. 48: 866, 1951.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gaebel, E., andTeschendorf, W. Darstellung der Gallenwege mit Biligrafin (Unblutige Cholangiographie).Roentgen-Blätter 6: 162, 1953.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huber, K., andStoessel, H. V. Die intravenoese Cholangiographie mit Biligrafin.Schweiz. med. Wchnschr. 84:3:117, 1954.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hagedorn, H. Erfahrungen mit dem neuen Kontrastmittel Biligrafin dei der Darstellung der Gallenblase und der Gallengaenge.Medizinische 52: 1693, 1953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nissen, K., andHorstmannshoff, W. Fortschritte in der Darstellung der intra- und extrahepatischen Gallenwege. (Schnellcholezystographie mit Biligrafin).Aertzl. Wchnschr. H. 49: 1178, 1953.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Myhre, H. Cholecystangiographie.Nord med. 50: 1746, 1953.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orloff, T. L.,et al. Intravenous choledochography with a new contrast medium, “Cholografin”.Radiology 62: 868, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berk, J. E.,et al. Intravenous cholecystography and cholangiography: Report of preliminary observations.Am. J. M. Sc. 227: 361, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Twiss, T. R.,et al. Post-cholecystectomy oral cholangiography: A preliminary report.Am. J. M. Sc. 227: 372, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sodeman, W. A. Pathologic Physiology. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1952, pp. 307–340.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rich, A. R. Pathogenesis of forms of jaundice.Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 47: 338, 1930.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ducci, H. Contribution of the laboratory to the differential diagnosis of jaundice.J.A.M.A. 135: 694, 1947.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Himsworth, H. P. Lectures on the Liver and its Diseases (comprising the Lowell Lectures delivered at Boston, Mass., in March, 1947) (ed. 2). Cambridge, Mass., Harvard, 1950.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pahl, R. Schnelle und erweiterte Gallenwegsdiagnostik mit neuen i.v. applizierbaren Kontrastmittel, 1. Mitteilung.Deutsche med. Wchnschr. 79: 363, 1954.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Theander, G. Side-effects of Biligrafin.Acta radiol. 43: 369, 1955.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul B. Hoeber, Inc. 1957

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl P. Steglich
    • 1
  • Harry B. Perlberg
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Department of Radiology of the Jersey City Medical CenterJersey City

Personalised recommendations