Skip to main content
Log in

Killing for God's sake: The spiritual crisis in religion and society

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unwittingly, religion often fosters or, at least, supports violence. Yet in a pluralistic society where religious tolerance is safeguarded, it is difficult to adjudicate public opinion that claims a religious base. This paper proposes a response-to tease apart religion and spirituality and to explicate spirituality as a human, and not necessarily a theological, thing. The core of such an understanding is the self-aware and self-transcending dimension of the human mind that can rightly be called spirit and to which numerous thinkers have pointed. Especially the thought of Bernard Lonergan contributes to a detailed account of this matter. Inherent in humanity as such, spirituality is essential to any society. Perforce spirituality is a necessary public concern, and it is a legitimate subject matter for the human sciences. On the common ground of spirituality, religious, political, and scientific collaboration could generate a shared ethos that supports social cohesion and proscribes violence from whatever source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augustine (1963).The Trinity (S. Mckenna, Trans.). Washington: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine (1991).Confessions (H. Chadwick, Trans.). Oxford/New York Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger, H. G. (1995, Feb.). The killing trail.Vanity Fair, 58(2), 80–88, 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (O. Kraus, Ed.; A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & L. L. McAlister, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published in 1874).

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1988). Letter to the bishops of the catholic church on the pastoral care of homosexual persons. In J. Gramick & P. Furey (Eds.),The Vatican and homosexuality: Reactions to the “Letter to the bishops of the catholic church on the pastoral care of homosexual persons” (pp. 1–10). New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, R. (1977).Subject and psyche: Ricoeur, Jung, and the search for foundations. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, R. (1981).Psychic conversion and theological foundations: Toward a reorientation of the human sciences. Chico, CA: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1947).Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Rinehart & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (1987).Spiritual development: An interdisciplinary study. Chicago: Loyola University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (1989). The quest for spiritual values.Pastoral Psychology, 38, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (1990). Spiritual concerns in Erich Fromm. In J. I. Packer (Ed.),The best in theology, vol. 4 (pp. 227–243). Carol Stream, IL: Christianity Today. (Reprinted fromJournal of Psychology and Theology, 1988,16, 222–232)

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (1996a). The human core of spirituality: Mind as psyche and spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (1996b). A scientific spirituality: The interface of psychology and theology.International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helminiak, D. A. (in press).Religion and the human sciences: An approach via spirituality. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holy Bible: The new revised standard version (1989). Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc.

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1959).Either/or (D. F. Swenson & L. M. Swenson, Trans.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieblich, J. (Sept. 8, 1995). Beliefs drive racial hatred, violence against the ’damned.’National Catholic Reporter, 31(39), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan, B. J. F. (1957).Insight: A study of human understanding. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan, B. J. F. (1972).Method in theology. New York: Herder & Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J. L. (1982).The new testament without illusion. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1991).The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, E. (1974). Reason: The classic experience.The Southern Review, 10, 237–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helminiak, D.A. Killing for God's sake: The spiritual crisis in religion and society. Pastoral Psychol 45, 365–374 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230992

Keywords

Navigation