Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating the impact of variable costs on SDy in complex situations

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inclusion of variable costs when estimating the standard deviation of job performance in dollars has been the basis for a number of highly important advances in utility analysis (e.g. Boudreau, 1983; Boudreau & Berger, 1985). However, no studies have shown the feasibility of incorporating variable costs in situations where multiple types of costs might require global estimation of variable costs. Results obtained from a nationwide sample of insurance personnel indicated that global estimates of variable costs were feasible to obtain in such complex situations but that those costs were not a fixed percentage of the value of job performance. Judges reported that the most important inputs of information into their estimates of the value of job performance in dollars were performance and output as well as initiative of the job holder. Surprisingly, salary related information was not reported as a relatively important input.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blankenship, M. H., Cesare, S. J., Gianetto, P. W., & Mandel, M. Z. (1991).A multi-level comparison of SDy estimates (DHR TR-91-1). San Diego, CA: County of San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobko, P., Karren, R., & Kerkar, S. P. (1987). Systematic research needs for understanding supervisory-based estimates of SDy in utility analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobko, P., Karren, R., & Parkington, J. J. (1983). Estimation of standard deviations in utility analyses: An empirical test.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(1), 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J. W. (1983). Economic considerations in estimating the utility of human resource productivity improvement programs.Personnel Psychology, 36, 551–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J. W. (1991). Utility analysis for decisions in human resource management. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2. (pp. 621–745). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J. W., & Berger, C. J. (1985). Decision-theoretic utility analysis applied to employee separations and acquisitions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 581–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J. W., & Rynes, S. L. (1985). Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 354–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunswick, E. (1956).Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. J. (1985). An investigation of dimensions employed and percentile ordering effects in estimating performance standard deviations in dollars for clerical occupations. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Burke, M. J., & Frederick, J. T. (1984). Two modified procedures for estimating standard deviations in utility analyses.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 482–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In P. S. Goodman, J. M. Pennings, & Associates (Eds.),New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 13–55). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1965).Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. R., & Edwards, J. E. (1987). A comparative study of multiple SDy estimation procedures. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, New Orleans, LA.

  • Dawes, R. M. (1982). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases pp. 391–407. New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (1977).Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Washington, D. C.: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, N. K., Wing, H., & Mitchell, K. J. (1985). Alternative methods of estimating the dollar value of performance.Personnel Psychology, 8, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. E., Frederick, J. T., & Burke, M. J. (1988). Efficacy of modified CREPID SDy's on the basis of archival organizational data.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3) 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florin-Thuma, B. C., & Boudreau, J. W. (1987). Performance feedback utility in a small organization: Effects on organizational outcomes and managerial decision processes.Personnel Psychology 40, 693–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, J. T., & Edwards, J. E. (1987). Utility analysis: Modifications of SDy estimation procedures. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, New Orleans, LA.

  • Green, P. E. & Rao, V. R. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data.Journal of Marketing Research, 8, August, 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E., & Wind, Y. (1975). New way to measure consumers' judgments.Harvard Business Review, July–August.

  • Greer, O. L., & Cascio, W. F. (1987). Is cost accounting the answer? Comparison of two behaviorally based methods for estimating the standard deviation of job performance in dollars with a cost accounting based approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 588–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Coggin, T. D. (1988). Problems and pitfalls in using capital budgeting and financial accounting techniques in assessing the utility of personnel programs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 522–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. D. (1990). Comprehensive measurement system to improve productivity/effectiveness. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Meetings, Miami, FL.

  • Karren, R., & Bobko, P. (1983). Conducting utility analyses: Some methodological concerns. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, Dallas, Texas.

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Leonard, R. L. (1987). An application of utility concepts to a supervisor skills training program: A time-based approach.Academy of Management Journal, 30, 316–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1989). A process-tracing approach toward understanding supervisor's SDy estimates: Results from five job classes.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980).A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, K. (1985). Development of a dollar criterion for high-level sales jobs. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meetings, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Pritchard, R. D., Jones, S. D., Roth, P. L., Steubing, K. K., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1989). The evaluation of an integrated approach to measuring organizational productivity.Personnel Psychology, 42, 69–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. D., & Roth, P. G. (1991). Accounting for non-linear utility functions in measures of productivity and performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju, N. S., Burke, M. J., & Normand, J. (1990). A new approach for utility analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R. (1977). Conjoint measurement in marketing analysis. In J. N. Seth (Ed.),Multivariate methods for market and survey research, pp. 257–286. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, J. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (1987). The effects of variability and risk in selection utility analysis: An empirical comparison.Personnel Psychology, 40, 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, J. (1979). Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 24 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L., Watson, M. D., Roth, P. G., & Pritchard, R. D. (in press). Productivity measurement in an electronic assembly plant. In R. D. Pritchard (Ed),Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case studies. New York: Praeger.

  • Roth, P. L. (in press). Research trends in judgment and their implications for the Schmidt-Hunter global estimation procedure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

  • Sawyer, J. S., Pritchard, R. D., Goode, A. (1991). Comparison of non-linear ProMES versus linear procedures for obtaining composite measures in performance appraisal. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Mack, M. J., & Hunter, J. E. (1984). Selection utility in the occupation of U.S. park ranger for three modes of test use.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 474–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. E., & Wright, P. (1976). Modeling an organizational buyer's product evaluation strategy: Validity and procedural considerations.Journal of Marketing Research, August, 211–225.

  • Seashore, S. E. (1972).The measurement of organizational effectiveness. Presented at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

  • Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences.Psychological Review, 76(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weekley, J. A., Frank, B., O'Connor, E. J., & Peters, L. H. (1985). A comparison of three methods of estimating the standard deviation of performance in dollars.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weekley, J. A., & Gier, J. A. (1986). An examination of the temporal consistency of rational SDy estimates. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, Chicago, IL.

  • Wroten, S. P. (1984). Estimating SDy for economic utility calculations: Measurement validity of Schmidt-Hunter's method of direct estimation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ohio State University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Clemson University, Sirrine Hall, 29634-1305, Clemson, SC

    Philip L. Roth

  2. Texas A & M University, USA

    Robert D. Pritchard

  3. Life Insurance Marketing and Research Association, USA

    John D. Stout & Steven H. Brown

Authors
  1. Philip L. Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert D. Pritchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John D. Stout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steven H. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Patricia G. Roth, Bart Osburn, and Jim Phillips for reviewing previous drafts of this work and contributing their valuable comments. The paper has improved as a result of their insights.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, P.L., Pritchard, R.D., Stout, J.D. et al. Estimating the impact of variable costs on SDy in complex situations. J Bus Psychol 8, 437–454 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230959

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230959

Keywords

Search

Navigation