Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 413–424 | Cite as

Personality variables related to integrity test scores: The role of conscientiousness

  • Kevin R. Murphy
  • Sandra L. Lee
Article

Abstract

Using a broad-based measure of normal personality, we tested the hypothesis that the trait “conscientiousness” is the best single predictor of scores on two well-researched integrity tests. Data from 180 traditional and nontraditional college students provided clear support for this hypothesis, but also indicated that a number of traits other than conscientiousness were likely to be related to integrity test scores. Scores on all six of the primary scales, and 33 of the 45 homogeneous item clusters (HICs) of the Hogan Personality Inventory were related to scores on the PDI Employment Inventory and/or the Personnel Selection Inventory. Personality variables were better predictors of scores on the PDI Employment inventory, which is a veiled-purpose (also referred to as “personality based”) test, than of scores on the Personnel Selection Inventory, which measures honesty-related attitudes and includes items calling for direct admissions of misdeeds.

Keywords

College Student Social Psychology Good Predictor Social Issue Normal Personality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ash, P. (1991).The construct of employee theft proneness. Park Ridge, IL: SRA/London House.Google Scholar
  2. Azjen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, J.M. & Schmidt, F.L. (1992).Personality, integrity and white collar crime. Presented as Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal.Google Scholar
  5. Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  6. Hogan, R.T. (1986).Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  7. Hogan, J. & Hogan, R. (1989). How to measure employee reliability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, J.W. & Terris, W. (1983). Personality correlates of theft and drug abuse among job applicants.Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the 16PF Test, 85–94.Google Scholar
  9. Korchin, S. (1987). Personality correlates of a measure of honesty.Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Logan, T.G., Koettel, R.C. & Moore, R.W. (1986). Personality correlates of a test of honesty.Psychological Reports, 59, 1015–1018.Google Scholar
  11. McCrea, R.R. & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1985). Updating Norman's “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and questionnaires.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McCrea, R.R. & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology.American Psychologist, 51, 1001–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCrea, R.R. & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy, K.R. (1993).Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  15. O'Bannon, M.R., Goldinger, L.A. & Appleby, G.S. (1989).Honesty and integrity testing: A practical guide. Atlanta, GA: Applied Information Resources.Google Scholar
  16. Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F.L. (In press). Integrity test validities: Meta-analytic tests of moderator hypotheses.Journal of Applied Psychology.Google Scholar
  17. Rafilson, F.M. (1988). Development of a standardized measure to predict employee productivity.Journal of Business and Psychology, 3, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sackett, P.R., Burris, L.R. & Callahan, C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update.Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–592.Google Scholar
  19. Sackett, P.R. & Harris, M.M. (1984). Honesty testing for personnel selection: A review and critique.Personnel Psychology, 37, 221–245.Google Scholar
  20. U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1990).The use of integrity tests for preemployment screening (OTA-SET 442). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Woolley, R.M. & Hakstian, A.R. (In press). An examination of the construct validity of personality-based and overt measures of integrity.Educational and Psychological Measurement.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin R. Murphy
    • 1
  • Sandra L. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyColorado State UniversityFort Collins

Personalised recommendations