Fluid Dynamics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 429–437 | Cite as

Optimal control of free-stream turbulence intensity by means of honeycombs

  • N. P. Mikhailova
  • E. U. Repik
  • Yu. P. Sosedko
Article

Abstract

The characteristics of honeycombs of different shapes and sizes used for reducing free-stream turbulence in wind tunnels have been experimentally investigated. The optimum geometric dimensions of the honeycomb and its optimum location in the wind tunnel necessary to ensure a minimum level of turbulence in the working section have been determined.

Keywords

Fluid Dynamics Wind Tunnel Optimum Location Geometric Dimension Minimum Level 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. I. Derbunovich, A. S. Zemskaya, E. U. Repik, and Yu. P. Sosedko, “Use of screens for controlling the structure of flow turbulence in wind tunnels,”Uch. Zap. TsAGI,13, 11 (1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. I. Derbunovich, A. S. Zemskaya, E. U. Repik, and Yu. P. Sosedko, “Optimum conditions of flow turbulence intensity control by means of screens,” in:Mechanics of Nonuniform and Turbulent Flows [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989), p. 35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. I. Derbunovich, A. S. Zemskaya, E. U. Repik, and Yu. P. Sosedko, “Optimum conditions for the suppression of flow turbulence in the working section of a wind tunnel using screens mounted in the settling chamber,”Uch. Zap. TsAGI,20, 37 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. I. Derbunovich, A. S. Zemskaya, E. U. Repik, and Yu. P. Sosedko, “Optimum conditions of turbulence reduction with screens,”Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. L. Lumley, “Passage of a turbulent stream through honeycomb of large length-to-diameter ratio,”Trans. ASME, J. Basic Eng.,86, 218 (1964).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. L. Lumley and J. F. Mc Mahon, “Reducing water tunnel turbulence by means of a honeycomb,”Trans. ASME, Ser. D., J. Basic. Eng.,89, 764 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. I. Loehrke and H. M. Nagib, “Control of free-stream turbulence by means of honeycombs: a balance between suppression and generation,”Trans. ASME, J. Fluid. Eng.,98, 342 (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Sheiman and J. D. Brooks, “Comparison of experimental and theoretical turbulence reduction from screens, honeycombs and honeycomb-screen combinations,”J. Aircr.,18, 638 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. I. Derbunovich, S. P. Lavrukhina, N. P. Mikhailova, E. U. Repik, and Yu. P. Sosedko, “The hydrodynamic drag of a honeycomb,”Uch. Zap. TsAGI,24, 107 (1993).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. I. Derbunovich, A. S. Zemskaya, E. U. Repik, and Yu. P. Sosedko, “Effect of the degree of flow convergence on the turbulence level,”Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, No. 2, 146 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Levy, “Universal Strouhal law, evidence and applications,Kinam.,5, 255 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. D. Mehta, “The aerodynamic design of blower tunnels with wide-angle diffusers,”Prog. Aerosp. Sci.,18, 59 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. L. Langhaar, “Steady flow in the transition length of a straight tube,”Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech.,9, A-55 (1942).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. P. Mikhailova
  • E. U. Repik
  • Yu. P. Sosedko

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations