Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of the melvin-sims word processing operator test

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Asher, J. J., & Sciarrino, J. A. (1974). Realistic work sample tests: A review.Personnel Psychology, 27, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, M. R., Dalessio, A. T., & Brown, S. H. (1988, August).Correspondence Between Estimates of Content and Criterion-Related Validity Values. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Distefano, W. K., Jr., Pryer, M. W., & Craig, S. H. (1980). Job-relatedness of a posttraining job knowledge criterion used to assess validity and test fairness.Personnel Psychology, 33, 785–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distefano, W. K. Jr., Pryer, M. W., & Erffmeyer, R. C. (1983). Application of content validity methods to the development of a job-related performance rating criterion.Personnel Psychology, 36, 621–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. K. & Wroten, S. P. (1984). Introducing new methods for conducting training evaluation and for linking training evaluation to program redesign.Personnel Psychology, 37, 651–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M. (1980). On trinitarian doctrines of validity.Professional Psychology 11, 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M., & Cranny, C. J. (1982). A note on concurrent and predictive validity designs: A critical reanalysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 239–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigler, M. H. (1989).Validation of the Melvin-Sims Word Processing Operator Test in a University Setting. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigler, M. H. & Melvin, K. B. (1989, August).Validation of the Melvin-Sims Word Processing Operator Test. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orelans, LA.

  • Landy, F. J. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science.American Psychologist, 41, 1183–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity.Personnel Psychology, 37, 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, K. B. & Sims, L. J. (1989).The Melvin-Sims Word Processing Operator Test Manual. Northport, AL: Melvin-Sims Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, L. J. (1988).Concurrent validation of the Melvin-Sims Word Processing Operator Test. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, L. J., Melvin, K. B., & Weeks, A. J. (1987, March).Construction of a test to classify word processing operators. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, Ga.

  • Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Metaanalyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics.Personnel Psychology, 37, 401–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Research Association. (1988).The Word Processing Assessment Battery. Chicago, Illinois: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Psychological Corporation. (1988).The Word Processing Test.Cleveland, OH: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melvin, K.B., Haigler, M.H., Sims, L.J. et al. Validation of the melvin-sims word processing operator test. J Bus Psychol 9, 199–221 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230637

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230637

Keywords

Navigation