Skip to main content
Log in

Symptom prescription and reframing: Should they be combined?

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study evaluated the initial effects of two types of paradoxical directives. Socially anxious males were randomly assigned to three groups: symptom prescription without reframing, symptom prescription with reframing, and a wait-list control condition. The assessment of outcome consisted of various measures administered pretreatment, posttreatment, and at 1-month followup, as well as daily self-ratings that were obtained throughout the course of the study. Subjects who were exposed to symptom prescription with reframing showed significantly greater improvement than the subjects in the other groups, both at posttreatment and at followup. In contrast, the subjects who were exposed to symptom prescription alone manifested only limited improvement and were not significantly less socially anxious after treatment than the subjects in the wait-list control group. The findings support the view that paradoxical treatments are clinically useful when their effects include changes in the meaning clients attribute to their symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akillas, E. (1991). Symptom prescription with and without reframing: Relative efficacy of two paradoxical directives in the treatment of socially anxious males (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1991).Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1046B.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, L. M. (1986). Several suggestions for the future of paradox in therapy.The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, L. M., & Turner, R. M. (1980). A comparison of two methods for the administration of paradoxical intention.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 121–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., Howard, G. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (1981). Effects of mono- versus multiple-operationalization in construct validation efforts.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, P. F. (1981). Some irreverent thoughts on paradox.Family Process, 20, 37–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, P. F. (1986). Why do we still call them “paradoxes”?Family Process, 25, 223–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Mariotto, M. J., Conger, A. J., Curran, J. P., & Wallander, J. L. (1979). Self-ratings and judges' ratings of heterosexual social anxiety and skill: A generalizability study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 164–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1960). Paradoxical intention: A logotherapeutic technique.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 14, 520–535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1985). Paradoxical intention. In G. R. Weeks (Ed.),Promoting change through paradoxical therapy (pp. 99–110). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Professional Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika 24, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1973).Uncommon therapy: The psychiatric techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1984).Ordeal therapy: Unusual ways to change behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. A. (1987). Meta-analysis of paradoxical interventions.Psychotherapy, 24, 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Grove, W. M. (1988). Normative comparisons in therapy outcome.Behavioral Assessment, 10, 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, D. S. (1983). Symptom prescription in psychotherapy.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., & Gursky, D. M. (1988). Anxiety sensitivity, injury sensitivity, and individual differences in fearfulness.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selvini-Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1978).Paradox and counterparadox: A new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction (E. V. Burt, Trans.). New York: Aronson. (Original work published 1975.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham-Salomon, V., Avner, R., & Neeman, R. (1989). You're changed if you do and changed if you don't: Mechanisms underlying paradoxical interventions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 590–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham-Salomon, V., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Paradoxical interventions: A meta-analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 22–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennen, H., Rohrbaugh, M., Press, S., & White, L. (1981). Reactance theory and therapeutic paradox: A compliance-defiance model.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 18, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., & Larkin, K. T. (1986). Situational determinants of social anxiety in clinic and nonclinic samples: Physiological and cognitive correlates.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 523–527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. M., McCann, B. S., Beidel, D. C., & Mezzich, J. E. (1986). DSM-III classification of the anxiety disorders: A Psychometric study.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 168–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. (1985). A Delphi study of paradox in therapy. In G. R. Weeks (Ed.),Promoting change through paradoxical therapy (pp. 2–25). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Professional Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Friend, D. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967).Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974).Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, G. R., & L'Abate, L. (1982).Paradoxical psychotherapy: Theory and practice with individuals, couples, and families. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1970).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based in part on a doctoral dissertation completed by the senior author. Alan L. Sockloff provided statistical advice, and Bret Boyer, Chris Combs, Amy Glascott, Alan Lipman, Leslie Parkes, Michael Penn, Lydia Santiago, and Fran Sessa served as therapists.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akillas, E., Efran, J.S. Symptom prescription and reframing: Should they be combined?. Cogn Ther Res 19, 263–279 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230400

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230400

Key words

Navigation