Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 117–127 | Cite as

Facet measures and global job satisfaction

  • Scott Highhouse
  • Alene S. Becker
Full Articles


This research was an attempt to find evidence for Scarpello and Campbell's (1983) conclusion that a single-item global measure is more content valid than a composite facet measure for assessing overall job satisfaction. The first study investigated responses from employees in three separate plants who completed a facet measure, a single-item global measure, along with items and facets chosen by an employee committee. Results indicated that the employee-chosen facets accounted for some incremental variance in the prediction of the single-item measure. A second study investigated the relationship between a single-item and a facet measure of benefit package satisfaction when the entire benefit package domain was included in the facet measure. The magnitude of the relationship suggested that the single-item measure of global benefit package satisfaction involved consideration of more than merely satisfaction with each element in the package. Limitations and alternative explanations for the findings are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldag, R.J., & Brief, A.P. (1978). Examination of alternative models of job satisfaction.Human Relations,31, 91–98.Google Scholar
  2. Brief, A.P., & Roberson, L. (1989). Job attitude organization: An exploratory study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,19, 717–727.Google Scholar
  3. Ferratt, T.W. (1981). Overall job satisfaction: Is it a linear function of facet satisfaction?Human Relations,34, 463–473.Google Scholar
  4. Fryxell, G.E., & Gordon, M.E. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union and management.Academy of Management Journal,32, 851–866.Google Scholar
  5. Ironson, G.H., Smith, P.C., Brannick, M.T., Gibson, W.M., & Paul, K.B. (1989). Construction of a job in general scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures.Journal of Applied Psychology,74, 193–200.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, W.R. (1991). An investigation of the dimensionality and construct validity of an abbreviated measure of union commitment. Paper presented at the sixth annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Saint Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  7. Locke, E.A. (1969). What is job satisfaction?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,4, 309–336.Google Scholar
  8. Murphy, K.R. (1991). Criterion issues in performance appraisal research: Behavioral accuracy versus classification accuracy.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50, 45–50.Google Scholar
  9. Rice, R.W., Gentile, D.A., & McFarlin, D.B. (1991). Facet importance and job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology,76, 31–39.Google Scholar
  10. Scarpello, V., & Campbell, J.P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there?Personnel Psychology,36, 577–600.Google Scholar
  11. Scarpello, V., & Vandenberg, R.J. (1987). The satisfaction with my supervisor scale: Its utility for research and practical applications.Journal of Management,13, 447–466.Google Scholar
  12. Stone, E.F., Stone, D.L., & Gueutal, H.G. (1990). Influence of cognitive ability on responses to questionnaire measures: Measurement precision and missing response problems.Journal of Applied Psychology,75, 418–427.Google Scholar
  13. Weaver, C.N. (1980). Job satisfaction in the United States in the 1970's.Journal of Applied Psychology,65, 364–367.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Highhouse
    • 2
  • Alene S. Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Anheuser-Busch CompaniesUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyIUPUIIndianapolis

Personalised recommendations