Skip to main content
Log in

Adoption decision making process: A pilot study of effects of psychological needs

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined an aspect of the adoption process which has received minimal research attention—time. Specifically, this study investigated the relationships between progression through the adoption process and the psychological needs for sensation and uniqueness. The results suggest that there exists an association between one's need for sensation and progression through the adoption process. A significantly weaker relationship was observed for the need for uniqueness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antil, J. H. (1984). Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 11 (pp. 203–209). Provo UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. & Lobouvie, E. W. (1986). The effect of sensation seeking on alcohol and marijuana use in adolescence.Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 5, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, G. M., Rogers, E. V., & Bohlen, J. M. (1957). Validity of the concept of stages in the adoption process.Rural Sociology, 22, 166–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszcyzynski, A. P., Wilson, A. C. & McConaghy, N. (1986). Sensation seeking and pathological gambling.British Journal of Addiction, 81, 113–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Lawrence A. (1981).Innovation diffusion: A new perspective. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. J. (1987). The relative influence of husbands and wives upon the adoption of new products. Paper presented at the American Collegiate Retailing Association Spring Conference, Minneapolis MN.

  • Burns, D. J. (1989). Innovative behavior: Toward a comprehensive model. In P. Bloom, et al. (Eds.),Enhancing knowledge development in marketing (p. 267). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D. J. (1992). Retail salespersons: Improvement of the prospecting function. Paper presented at the American Collegiate Retailing Association Winter Conference, New York NY.

  • Burns, D. J. & Krampf, R. F. (1991). A semiotic perspective on innovative behavior. In R. L. King (Ed.),Developments in marketing science, vol. 14 (pp. 32–35). Richmond VA: Academy of Marketing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, J. H., Sill, M. L. & Brown, E. J. (1958). The function of information sources in the farm practice adoption process.Rural Sociology, 23, 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands.Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1986).Consumer Behavior, 5th ed. Chicago: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1983). A biomedical-genetical analysis of impulsive behavior and sensation seeking behavior. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.),Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, H. L. (1970). Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of indistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521–529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, H. L. (1972). Feelings of interpersonal indistinctiveness: An unpleasant affective state.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, H. L., Brant, J. M., Dipboye, R. L., & Pyle, M. (1974). Number of similar strangers and feelings of indistinctiveness as boundary conditions for the similarity attraction relationship: A bridge between different sandboxes.Institute for research in the behavioral, economic and management science, Paper No. 478. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, H. L., Olson, J. C., Dipboye, R. L. & Barnaby, D. (1971). A commodity theory analysis of consumer preferences for scarce products. InProceedings of the 79th annual convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 653–654). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W., Sybil, B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Zuckerman, M. (1980). A genetic and environmental analysis of sensation seeking.Journal of Research in Psychology, 14, 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, E. L. & Hupp, G. (1968). Perception of self, generalized substitutes, and brand selection.Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. (1979). Individual creativity and creativogenic society. In O. C. Ferrell, et al. (Eds.),Conceptual and theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 264–280). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun.Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, M. J. & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspective on involvement. In S. C. Jain (Ed.),Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and direction (pp. 184–187). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology, vol. 1. New York: H. Holt & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, et al. (Eds.),Readings in social psychology (pp. 410–414). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonglan, G. E. & Coward, E. W. (1970). The concept of symbolic adoption: A suggested interpretation.Rural Sociology, 35, 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, J. W. (1966). Adoption stages and perceptions of characteristics of educational innovations. Ed.D. Thesis, University of Oregon.

  • LaMar, R. V. (1966). In-service education needs related to the diffusion of an innovation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California-Berkeley.

  • Logue, A. W. & Smith, M. E. (1986). Predictors of food preferences in adult humans.Appetite, 7, 109–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, L. & Pessemier, E. A. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review.Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, R. A., Grossbart, S. L., Curtis, W. W. & DeVere, S. P. (1976). Optimum stimulation level and the adoption decision process.Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S. (1974). A critical examination of adoption process models of consumer behavior. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.),Models of buyer behavior: Conceptual, quantitative and empirical (pp. 271–295). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S. (1984). Marketing's potential contribution to consumer behavior research: The case of diffusion theory. In T.C. Kinnear (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research. Provo UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983).Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971).Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934).The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. & Endelman, J. R. (1979). Effects of degree of interpersonal similarity on physical distance and self-reported attraction: A comparison of uniqueness and reinforcement theory predictions.Journal of Personality, 47, 492–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. & Fromkin, H. L. (1980).Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1934).The theory of the leisure class: An economic history of institutions. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlers, R. G. & Etzel, M. J. (1985). Vacation preference as a manifestation of optimal stimulation and lifestyle experience.Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, Z. (1984). Sensation seeking and risk-taking behavior.Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 607–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellinger, D. A., Fromkin, H. L., Speller, D. E. & Kohn, C. A. (1974). A commodity theory analysis of the effects of age restrictions upon pornographic materials.Institute for research in the behavioral, economic, and management sciences, Paper No. 440. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979).Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1983). A biological theory of sensation seeking. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.),Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 37–76). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Neary, R. & Brustman, B. (1970). Sensation seeking correlates in experience (smoking, drugs, alcohol, “hallucinations,” and sex) and preference for complexity (designs).Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 317–318). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, D.J. Adoption decision making process: A pilot study of effects of psychological needs. J Bus Psychol 8, 199–213 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230385

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230385

Keywords

Navigation