Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 199–213 | Cite as

Adoption decision making process: A pilot study of effects of psychological needs

  • David J. Burns
Full Articles

Abstract

The present study examined an aspect of the adoption process which has received minimal research attention—time. Specifically, this study investigated the relationships between progression through the adoption process and the psychological needs for sensation and uniqueness. The results suggest that there exists an association between one's need for sensation and progression through the adoption process. A significantly weaker relationship was observed for the need for uniqueness.

Keywords

Pilot Study Social Psychology Social Issue Research Attention Weak Relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antil, J. H. (1984). Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 11 (pp. 203–209). Provo UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, M. & Lobouvie, E. W. (1986). The effect of sensation seeking on alcohol and marijuana use in adolescence.Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 5, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beal, G. M., Rogers, E. V., & Bohlen, J. M. (1957). Validity of the concept of stages in the adoption process.Rural Sociology, 22, 166–168.Google Scholar
  4. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszcyzynski, A. P., Wilson, A. C. & McConaghy, N. (1986). Sensation seeking and pathological gambling.British Journal of Addiction, 81, 113–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, Lawrence A. (1981).Innovation diffusion: A new perspective. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, D. J. (1987). The relative influence of husbands and wives upon the adoption of new products. Paper presented at the American Collegiate Retailing Association Spring Conference, Minneapolis MN.Google Scholar
  8. Burns, D. J. (1989). Innovative behavior: Toward a comprehensive model. In P. Bloom, et al. (Eds.),Enhancing knowledge development in marketing (p. 267). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  9. Burns, D. J. (1992). Retail salespersons: Improvement of the prospecting function. Paper presented at the American Collegiate Retailing Association Winter Conference, New York NY.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, D. J. & Krampf, R. F. (1991). A semiotic perspective on innovative behavior. In R. L. King (Ed.),Developments in marketing science, vol. 14 (pp. 32–35). Richmond VA: Academy of Marketing Science.Google Scholar
  11. Copp, J. H., Sill, M. L. & Brown, E. J. (1958). The function of information sources in the farm practice adoption process.Rural Sociology, 23, 146–157.Google Scholar
  12. Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands.Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 80–84.Google Scholar
  13. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1986).Consumer Behavior, 5th ed. Chicago: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). A biomedical-genetical analysis of impulsive behavior and sensation seeking behavior. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.),Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Fromkin, H. L. (1970). Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of indistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fromkin, H. L. (1972). Feelings of interpersonal indistinctiveness: An unpleasant affective state.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 178–182.Google Scholar
  17. Fromkin, H. L., Brant, J. M., Dipboye, R. L., & Pyle, M. (1974). Number of similar strangers and feelings of indistinctiveness as boundary conditions for the similarity attraction relationship: A bridge between different sandboxes.Institute for research in the behavioral, economic and management science, Paper No. 478. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  18. Fromkin, H. L., Olson, J. C., Dipboye, R. L. & Barnaby, D. (1971). A commodity theory analysis of consumer preferences for scarce products. InProceedings of the 79th annual convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 653–654). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Fulker, D. W., Sybil, B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Zuckerman, M. (1980). A genetic and environmental analysis of sensation seeking.Journal of Research in Psychology, 14, 261–281.Google Scholar
  20. Grubb, E. L. & Hupp, G. (1968). Perception of self, generalized substitutes, and brand selection.Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 58–63.Google Scholar
  21. Hirschman, E. (1979). Individual creativity and creativogenic society. In O. C. Ferrell, et al. (Eds.),Conceptual and theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 264–280). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  22. Holbrook, M. B. & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun.Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houston, M. J. & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspective on involvement. In S. C. Jain (Ed.),Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and direction (pp. 184–187). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  24. James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology, vol. 1. New York: H. Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, et al. (Eds.),Readings in social psychology (pp. 410–414). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  26. Klonglan, G. E. & Coward, E. W. (1970). The concept of symbolic adoption: A suggested interpretation.Rural Sociology, 35, 77–83.Google Scholar
  27. Kohl, J. W. (1966). Adoption stages and perceptions of characteristics of educational innovations. Ed.D. Thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  28. LaMar, R. V. (1966). In-service education needs related to the diffusion of an innovation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California-Berkeley.Google Scholar
  29. Logue, A. W. & Smith, M. E. (1986). Predictors of food preferences in adult humans.Appetite, 7, 109–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McAlister, L. & Pessemier, E. A. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review.Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittelstaedt, R. A., Grossbart, S. L., Curtis, W. W. & DeVere, S. P. (1976). Optimum stimulation level and the adoption decision process.Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robertson, T. S. (1974). A critical examination of adoption process models of consumer behavior. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.),Models of buyer behavior: Conceptual, quantitative and empirical (pp. 271–295). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  33. Robertson, T. S. (1984). Marketing's potential contribution to consumer behavior research: The case of diffusion theory. In T.C. Kinnear (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research. Provo UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, E. M. (1983).Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971).Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934).The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Snyder, C. R. & Endelman, J. R. (1979). Effects of degree of interpersonal similarity on physical distance and self-reported attraction: A comparison of uniqueness and reinforcement theory predictions.Journal of Personality, 47, 492–505.Google Scholar
  38. Snyder, C. R. & Fromkin, H. L. (1980).Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  39. Veblen, T. (1934).The theory of the leisure class: An economic history of institutions. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  40. Wahlers, R. G. & Etzel, M. J. (1985). Vacation preference as a manifestation of optimal stimulation and lifestyle experience.Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 283–295.Google Scholar
  41. Zaleski, Z. (1984). Sensation seeking and risk-taking behavior.Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 607–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zellinger, D. A., Fromkin, H. L., Speller, D. E. & Kohn, C. A. (1974). A commodity theory analysis of the effects of age restrictions upon pornographic materials.Institute for research in the behavioral, economic, and management sciences, Paper No. 440. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  43. Zuckerman, M. (1979).Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Zuckerman, M. (1983). A biological theory of sensation seeking. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.),Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 37–76). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  45. Zuckerman, M., Neary, R. & Brustman, B. (1970). Sensation seeking correlates in experience (smoking, drugs, alcohol, “hallucinations,” and sex) and preference for complexity (designs).Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 317–318). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Burns
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MarketingYoungstown State UniversityYoungstown

Personalised recommendations