Abstract
There is considerable controversy surrounding the legal standards used to detect and prosecute cases involving predatory pricing. This paper recommends the use of a two tiered standard in predatory pricing litigation. The first part of the test is designed to determine whether the market is structurally predisposed toward predation. The second part of the test examines the issue of predatory intent. Flexibility is built into these guidelines by giving the plaintiff an option in terms of the evidentiary burden it must carry. The administrative feasibility of this two tiered proposal is demonstrated in a case study analysis. The case analysis shows that the application of a mechanical price-cost predation rule would have incorrectly resulted in a guilty verdict.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Areeda and D. Turner, "Predatory Pricing and the Sherman Act,"Harvard Law Review, Vol. 88 (1975), p. 697.
J. Bain,Barriers to Competition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1956).
Brief of Appellant, p. 8.
Census of Manufacturers 1972, Vol. I, Table III, Sr. 3–42.
D. Greer, "A Critique of Areed and Turner's Standard for Predatory Practices,"Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 24 (Summer, 1979), p. 233.
P. Joskow and A. Klevorick, "A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy,"Yale Law Journal, Vol. 89 (1979), p. 213.
C. McCall,Predatory Pricing: An Economic and Legal Analysis, Ph.D. diss., Temple University, 1982.
J. McGee, "Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Case,"Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 1 (October 1958), p. 137; "Predatory Pricing Revisited,"Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 23 (October 1980), p. 289.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1967, p. 691.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1968, p. 806.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1967, p. 2326.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1972, p. 938.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1973, p. 2911.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1970, p. 432.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1972, p. 938.
Moody's Industrial Manual 1973, p. 954.
Pacific Engineering and Production Company of Nevada v. Kerr-McGee Corporation and Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation, 551 F. 2d 790 (10th circuit 1977).
F. Scherer, "Predatory Pricing and the Sherman Act: A Comment,"Harvard Law Review, Vol. 88 (1976), p. 869.
Wall Street Journal, May 5, 1976, p. 12.
R. Wiech,Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion, (New York: Reinhold, 1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCall, C.W. Rule of reason versus mechanical tests in the adjudication of price predation. Rev Ind Organ 3, 15–44 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229564
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229564