Skip to main content
Log in

Recent ceramic analysis: 1. Function, style, and origins

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Research Aims and scope

Abstract

The recent literature on ceramic analysis, which has grown dramatically over the last 8 years, is reviewed in two articles. In this first article attention focuses on studies of function and use, stylistic analyses, and pottery origins. Functional analysis has been the most rapidly expanding segment of the field, particularly experimental, ethnoarchaeological, and residue analysis approaches. Stylistic analyses seem to be in a lull, following increasing dissatisfaction with information theory approaches. Questions of pottery origins are enjoying renewed interest and are briefly surveyed here. The second of the two articles will survey compositional investigations, pottery production, and approaches to “ceramic theory.” Both reviews close with observations on current directions in ceramic studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Arnold, D. E. (1985).Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. E. (1993).Ecology and Ceramic Production in an Andean Community, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, P. J. (1991).Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization: A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, N. (1994).Smashing Pots. Works of Clay from Africa, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. K., and Hoopes, J. A. (eds.) (1995).The Emergence of Pottery: Technology and Innovation in Ancient Societies, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. W., Smart, C. J., and Ossenkop, D. J. (1989). Residues and linings in ancient Mediterranean transport amphoras. In Allen, R. O. (ed.),Archaeological Chemistry, Vol. 4. Advances in Chemistry Series 220, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bey, G. J., III, and Pool, C. A. (eds.) (1992).Ceramic Production and Distribution, An Integrated Approach, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biers, W. R., and McGovern, P. E. (eds.) (1990).Organic Contents and Ancient Vessels: Materials Analysis and Archaeological Investigation, MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, Vol. 7, Philadelphia.

  • Bishop, R. L., and Lange, F. W. (eds.) (1991).The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard, University Press of Colorado, Niwot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, J. A., and Bennett, W. J. (eds.) (1989).Analysis and Publication of Ceramics, BAR International Series 551, Oxford.

  • Bollong, C. A. (1994). Analysis of site stratigraphy and formation processes using patterns of pottery sherd dispersion.Journal of Field Archaeology 21: 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollong, C. A., Vogel, J. C., Jacobson, L., van der Westhuizen, W. A., and Sampson, C. G. (1993). Direct dating and identify of fibre temper in pre-contact Bushman (Basarwa) pottery.Journal of Archaeological Science 20(1): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P. (1983). Pots as tools. In Keene, A. S., and Moore, J. A. (eds.),Archaeological Hammers and Theories, Academic Press, New York, pp. 107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D.P. (1991). Why decorate a pot? Midwestern household pottery, 200 B.C.-A.D. 600.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 360–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P. (1995). Style, selection, and historicity. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.),Style, Society, and Person. Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, J.O. (1946). The uses and abuses of taxonomy. InArchaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southeastern Utah, Papers of the Peabody Museum, Vol. 21, Peabody Museum, Cambridge, pp. 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronitsky, G. (1986). The use of materials-science techniques in the study of pottery construction and use. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 9, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 209–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronitsky, G. (ed.) (1989).Pottery Technology, Ideas and Approaches, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronitsky, G., and Hamer, R. (1986). Experiments in ceramic technology: The effects of various tempering materials on impact and thermal-shock resistance.American Antiquity 51(1): 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A. (1989). The beginnings of pottery as an economic process. In van der Leeuw, S. E., and Torrence, R. (eds.),What's New? A Closer Look at the Process of Innovation, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (1994). Access to subsistence resources and the sexual division of labor among potters.Cross-Cultural Research 28(3): 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canouts, V. (1991). A formal approach to design: Symmetry and beyond. In Bishop, R. L., and Lange, F. W. (eds.),The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard, University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp. 280–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.) (1995a).Style, Society, and Person. Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (1995b). Integrating approaches to material style in theory and philosophy. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J.E. (eds.),Style Society, and Person. Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S., Evershed, R. P., Goad, L. J., Leyden, A., Blinkhorn, P. W., and Denham, V. (1993). Quantification and distribution of lipid in archaeological ceramics: Implications for sampling potsherds for organic residue analysis and the classification of vessel use.Archaeometry 35(2): 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1989). Ceramics and territory.Science 244: 1500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W., and Hastorf, C. (eds.) (1990).The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, N., Sterner, J., and Gavua, K. (1988). Why pots are decorated.Current Anthropology 39(3): 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, M. (1990). Exploratory analyses of food residues from prehistoric pottery and other artifacts from Eastern Canada.Society for Archaeological Sciences Bulletin 13(1): 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, M., with Silk, P. (1988). Absorption residues and vessel function: A case study from the Maine-Maritimes region. In Kolb, C. C., and Lackey, L. (eds.),A Pot for All Reasons: Ceramic Ecology Revisited, Temple University, Laboratory of Anthropology (special publication ofCerámica de Cultura Maya), Philadelphia, pp. 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, M., Morton, J., and Foulkes, E. (1991). The role of ceramics among the prehistoric hunter-gatherers of the Main-Maritimes region: A view from the New Brunswick interior. In Deal, M. (ed.),Archaeology of the Maritime Provinces: Past and Present Research, Council of Maritime Premiers, Fredericton, NB, pp. 8–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R. (1990). Interaction, imitation, and communication as expressed in style: The Ucayali experience. In Conkey, M. W., and Hastorf, C. (eds.),The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R. (1991). The decorative burden: Design, medium, and change. In Longacre, W. A. (ed.),Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 144–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C., and Hunt, T. L. (1990). Elemental composition and inference of ceramic vessel function.Current Anthropology 31(3): 330–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, B. (1994). Protein and lipid analysis of food residues. In Hather, J. G. (ed.),Tropical Archaeobotany, Applications and New Developments, Routledge, London, pp. 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feathers, J. K. (1989). Effects of temper on strength of ceramics: Response to Bronitsky and Hamer.American Antiquity 54(3): 579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fie, S. M., Fountain, J., Hunt, E. D., Zubrow, E., Jacobi, R., Bartalotta, K., Brennan, J., Allen, K., and Bush, P. (1990). Encrustations in Iroquois ceramic vessels and food resource areas. In Biers, W. R., and McGovern, P. E. (eds.),Organic Contents and Ancient Vessels: Materials Analysis and Archaeological Investigation, MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, Vol. 7, Philadelphia, pp. 11–23.

  • Freestone, I. C., Middleton, A. P., and Meeks, N. D. (1994). Significance of phosphate in ceramic bodies: Discussion of paper by Bollonget al.Journal of Archaeological Science 21(3): 425–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, A., and Woods, A.J. (1990).Prehistoric Pottery for the Archaeologist, Leicester University Press, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, A. C. (1988). On the study of technological change.Current Anthropology 29: 320–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. D., Tarka, S. M., Jr., Hurst, W.J., Stuart, D., and Adams, R. E. W. (1990). Cacao residues in ancient Maya vessels from Río Azul, Guatemala.American Antiquity 55(1): 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hally, D. (1983). Use alteration of pottery vessel surfaces: An important source of evidence in the identification of vessel function.North American Archaeologist 4(1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hally, D. (1986). The identification of vessel function: A case study from northwest Georgia.American Antiquity 51(2): 267–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, K. L. (1993).The Aesthetics of Action. Continuity and Change in a West African Town, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, C. A., and DeNiro, M. J. (1985). Reconstruction of prehistoric plant production and cooking practices by a new isotopic method.Nature 315: 489–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegmon, M. (1992). Archaeological research on style.Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrickson, E. F. (1990). Investigating ancient ceramic form and use: Progress report and case study. In Kingery, W. D. (ed.),The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society: 26,000 B.P. to the Present, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, pp. 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron, C., and Evershed, R. P. (1993). The analysis of organic residues and the study of pottery use. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 247–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron, C., and Pollard, M. (1988). The analysis of natural resinous materials from Roman amphoras. In Slater, E. A., and Tate, J. O. (eds.),Science and Archaeology—Glasgow 1987, Proceedings of a Conference on the Application of Scientific Techniques to Archaeology, BAR. British Series 196, Oxford, pp. 429–446.

  • Hill, J. N. (1985). Style: A conceptual evolutionary framework. In Nelson, B. A. (ed.),Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 362–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1991). The decoration of containers: An ethnographic and historical study. In Longacre, W. A. (ed.),Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. G., and Minc, L. D. (1991). The spatial patterning of Aztec ceramics: Implications for understanding prehispanic exchange systems in the valley of Mexico.Journal of Field Archaeology 17: 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. G., Neff, H., Blackman, M. J., and Minc, L. D. (1993). Black-on-orange ceramic production in the Aztec empire's heartland.Latin American Antiquity 4(2): 130–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, J. A. (1994). Ford revisited: A critical review of the chronology and relationships of the earliest ceramic complexes in the New World, 6000–1500 B.C.Journal of World Prehistory 8(1): 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, F. S. (1994).A Mexican Folk Pottery Tradition. Cognition and Style in Material Culture in the Valley of Puebla, Southern Illnois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, W. D. (ed.) (1990).The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society: 26,000 B.P. to the Present, Ceramics and Civilization Vol. V, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, C. C. (ed.) (1988).Ceramic Ecology Revisited, 1987: The Technology and Socioeconomics of Pottery, BAR. International Series S436 (2 vol.), Oxford.

  • Kolb, C. C. (1989a). The current status of ceramic studies. In Kolb, C. C. (ed.),Ceramic Ecology, 1988: Current Research on Ceramic Materials, BAR International Series 513, Oxford, pp. 377–421.

  • Kolb, C. C. (1989b). Ceramic ecology in retrospect: A critical review of methodology and results. In Kolb, C. C. (ed.),Ceramic Ecology, 1988: Current Research on Ceramic Materials, BAR International Series 513, Oxford, pp. 261–375.

  • Kolb, C. C. (ed.) (1989c).Ceramic Ecology, 1988: Current Research on Ceramic Materials, BAR International Series 513, Oxford.

  • Kolb, C. C., and Lackey, L. M. (eds.) (1988).A Pot for All Reasons: Ceramic Ecology Revisited, Temple University, Laboratory of Anthropology (special publication ofCerámica de Cultura Maya), Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1988).The Jealous Potter (trans. by B. Chorier), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, R. (1944). North American cooking pots.American Antiquity 9(4): 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, F. C., and Lister, R. H. (1987).Andalusian Ceramics in Spain and New Spain. A Cultural Register from the Third Century B.C. to 1700, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, W. A. (ed.) (1991a).Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, W. A. (1991b). Ceramic ethnoarchaeology: An introduction. In Longacre, W. A. (ed.),Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, W. A., and Skibo, J. M. (eds.) (1994).Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology. Expanding Archaeological Method and Theory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis, Y. (ed.) (1991).Archaeometry: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. L. (1992). Review of “Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics” by C. M. Sinopoli.American Antiquity 57(3): 559–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marken, M. W. (1994).Pottery from Spanish Shipwrecks, 1500–1800, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, P. E., and Notis, M. D. (eds.) (1989).Cross-Craft and Cross-Cultural Interactions in Ceramics, Ceramics and Civilization, Vol. IV, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, A., and Freestone, I. (eds.) (1991).Recent Developments in Ceramic Petrology, British Museum Occasional Paper No. 81, British Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. J. (1989). Integrating functional analyses of vessels and sherds through models of ceramic assemblage formation.World Archaeology 21: 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H. (ed.) (1992).Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H. (1994). Review of “Pottery Function: A Use-Alteration Perspective,” by J. M. Skibo.American Antiquity 59(2): 378–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, C., Tyers, P., and Vince, A. (1993).Pottery in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S. (1995). Approaches to style. Complements and contrasts. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.),Style, Society, and Person: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rands, R. L. (1988). Least-cost and function-optimizing interpretations of ceramic production: An archaeological perspective. In Kolb, C. C. (ed.),Ceramic Ecology Revisited, 1987: The Technology and Socioeconomics of Pottery, BAR International Series 436(ii), Oxford, pp. 165–198.

  • Read, D. W. (1989). Intuitive typology and automatic classification: Divergence or full circle?Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8(2): 158–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reents-Budet, D. (1994).Painting the Maya Universe: Royal Ceramics of the Classic Period, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, K. C. (1984). Fire and ice: New evidence for the production and preservation of Late Archaic fiber-tempered pottery in the middle-latitude lowlands.American Antiquity 49(1): 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, K. C. (1989). A materials science perspective on hunter-gatherer pottery. In Bronitsky, G. (ed.),Pottery Technology, Ideas and Approaches, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. M. (1984). Overview and prospect. In Rice, P. M. (ed.),Pots and Potters: Current Approaches in Ceramic Archaeology, UCLA Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, pp. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. M. (1987).Pottery Analysis, a Sourcebook, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. M. (1990). Functions and uses of archaeological ceramics. In Kingery, W. D. (ed.),The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society: 26,000 B.P. to the Present, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. M. (1991). Women and prehistoric pottery production. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.),The Archaeology of Gender, University of Calgary, Calgary, pp. 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridings, R., and Sampson, C. G. (1990). There's no percentage in it: Intersite spatial analysis of Bushman (San) pottery decorations.American Antiquity 55(4): 766–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röttlander, R. C. A. (1990). Lipid analysis in the identification of vessel contents. In Biers, W. R., and McGovern, P. E. (eds.),Organic Contents and Ancient Vessels: Materials Analysis and Archaeological Investigation, MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, Vol. 7, Philadelphia, pp. 37–40.

  • Rye, O. S. (1976). Keeping your temper under control.Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11(2): 106–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, C. G. (1988).Stylistic Boundaries Among Mobile Hunter-Foragers, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassaman, K. E. (1993).Early Pottery in the Southeast. Tradition and Innovation in Cooking Technology, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, E. V.,et al. (eds.) (1988).Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 123, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1990a). The influence of surface treatment on heating effectiveness of ceramic vessels.Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1990b). Technological change in water-storage and cooking pots: Some predictions from experiment. In Kingery, W. D. (ed.),The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society: 26,000 B.P. to the Present, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, pp. 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., and Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change.Current Anthropology 28: 595–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., Skibo, J. M., Boelke, T. C., Neupert, M. A., and Aronson, M. (1994). New perspectives on experimental archaeology: Surface treatments and thermal response of the clay cooking pot.American Antiquity 59(2): 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherriff, B. L., Tisdale, M. A., Sayer, B. G., Schwarcz, H. P., and Knyf, M. (1995). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and isotopic analysis of carbonized residues from subarctic Canadian prehistoric pottery.Archaeometry 37(1): 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. M. (1991).Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M. (1992a).Pottery Function: A Use-Alteration Perspective, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M. (1992b). Ethnoarchaeology, experimental archaeology and inference building in ceramic research.Archaeologia Polona 30: 27–38. Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., Schiffer, M. B., and Reid, K. C. (1989). Organic-tempered pottery: An experimental study.American Antiquity 54(1): 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. F., Jr. (1988). Function from whole vessel shape: A method and an application to Anasazi Black Mesa, Arizona.American Anthropologist 90: 912–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. F., Jr. (ed.) (1994).Function and Technology of Anasazi Ceramics from Black Mesa, Arizona, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper, no. 15, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A. B. (1989). Plant-food processing: Implications for dietary quality. In Harris, D. R., and Hillman, G. C. (eds.),Foraging and Farming. The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. T. (1991). Ceramic change in ethnoarchaeological perspective: A Kalinga case study.Asian Perspectives 30(2): 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, J. (1989). Who is signalling whom? Ceramic style, ethnicity and taphonomy among the Sirak Bulahay.Antiquity 63: 451–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, P. B. (1987). Sequential slab construction; a conservative Southwest Asiatic ceramic tradition, ca. 7000–3000 B.C.Paléorient 13(2): 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J. R., and Wheeler, G. S. (eds.) (1991).Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 185, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J. R., Wheeler, G. S., and Freestone, I. C. (eds.) (1992).Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 267, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, P. B., Soffer, O., and Klima, B. (1990). Venuses and wolverines: The origins of ceramic technology, ca. 26,000 B.P. In Kingery, W. D. (ed.),The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society: 26,000 B.P. to the Present, Ceramics and Civilization, Vol. 5, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, pp. 13–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, P. B., Soffer, O., Klima, B., and Svoboda, J. (1989). The origins of ceramic technology at Dolni Vestoniçe, Czechoslovakia.Science 246: 1002–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In Cleland, C. E. (ed.),For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, Anthropological Papers No. 61, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, A. J. (1986). Form, fabric, and function: Some observations on the cooking pot in antiquity. In Kingery, W. D. (ed.),Technology and Style, Ceramics and Civilization, Vol. 2, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, pp. 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. P. (1991). Women's labor and pottery production in prehistory. In, Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 194–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. C., and Stone, T. (1990). The thermal properties of textured ceramics: An experimental study.Journal of Field Archaeology 17: 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W. (1992). Formal models of ceramic production. In Bey, G. J., III, and Pool, C. A. (eds.),Ceramic Production and Distribution, an Integrated Approach, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography of recent literature

  • Aronson, M., Skibo, J. M., and Stark, M. (1991). Use technologies: An ethnoarchaeological study of Kalinga pottery. In Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J., and Wheeler, G. S. (eds.),Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 185, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, pp. 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benco, N. (1991). Review of “Pottery Technology: Ideas and Approaches,” edited by G. Bronitsky.American Anthropologist 93(2): 506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S., Evershed, R. P., Blinkhorn, P. W., and Denham, V. (1995). Evidence for the mixing of fats and waxes in archaeological ceramics.Archaeometry 37(1): 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, M., and Herbich, I. (1989).Tich Matek: The technology of Luo pottery production and the definition of ceramic style.World Archaeology 21(1): 148–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, A. A., and Lindauer, O. (1988). Hierarchical and nonhierarchical approaches to ceramic design analysis: A response to Jernigan.American Antiquity 53(3): 620–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, P. (1990). How crude is Mayorama pottery?Journal of Latin American Lore 16(1): 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evershed, R. P., Heron, C., and Goad, L. J. (1991). Epicuticular wax components preserved in potsherds as chemical indicators of leafy vegetables in ancient diets.Antiquity 65: 540–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evershed, R. P., Heron, C., Charters, S., and Goad, L. J. (1992). The survival of food residues: New methods of analysis, interpretation and application. In Pollard, A. M. (ed.),New Developments in Archaeological Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evershed, R. P., Heron, C., Charters, S., and Goad, L. J. (1992). Chemical analysis of organic residues in ancient pottery: Methodological guidelines and applications. In White, R., and Page, I. (eds.),Organic Residues in Archaeology: Their Identification and Analysis, UKIC Archaeology Section, London, pp. 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, K. P. (1991). Ceramic imagery in ancient Near Eastern literature. In Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J., and Wheeler, G. S. (eds.),Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 185, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, pp. 389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, I. C (1987). Ceramic analysis. In Mellars, P. (ed.),Research Priorities in Archaeological Science, Council for British Archaeology, pp. 33–35.

  • Fulford, M. G., and Huddleston, K. (1991).The Current State of Romano-British Pottery Studies. English Heritage Occasional Papers No. 1, London.

  • Hardin, M. A. (1991). Sources of ceramic variability at Zuni pueblo. In Longacre, W. A. (ed.),Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 40–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrickson, R. C. (1992) Analysis of use wear on ceramic potter's tools. In Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J. R., Wheeler, G. S., and Freestone, I. C. (eds.),Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 267, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, pp. 475–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbich, I. (1987). Learning patterns, potter interaction and ceramic style among the Luo of Kenya.African Archaeological Review 5: 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbich, I., and Dietler, M. (1989). River-Lake Nilotic: Luo. In Barbour, J., and Wandibba, S. (eds.),Kenyan Pots and Potters, Oxford University Press and Kenya Museum Society, Nairobi, pp. 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbich, I., and Dietler, M. (1991). Aspects of the ceramic system of the Luo of Kenya. InTöpferei- und Keramikforschung, Band 2, Bonn, Dr. Rudolf Habelt GMBH.

  • Heron, C., Evershed, R. P., Goad, L. J., and Denham, V. (1991). New approaches to the analysis of organic residues from archaeological ceramics. In Budd, P., Chapman, B., Jackson, C., Janaway, R., and Ottaway, B. (eds.),Archaeological Sciences 1989: Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeological Sciences, Oxbow Monographs 9, Oxbow, Oxford, pp. 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexter, M. R., and Hopwood, W. R. (1992). Investigation of decorative coating on Kongo ceramics using U.V. light and FTIR analysis. In Vandiver, P. B., Druzik, J. R., Wheeler, G. S., and Freestone, I. C. (eds.),Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III, MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 267, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, pp. 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgeman, S. L. (1991). Angel Negative painted design structure.Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 16: 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. E., and Evans, J. (1989). Crops of the Pacific: New evidence from the chemical analysis of organic residues in pottery. In Harris, D. R., and Hillman, G. C. (eds.),Foraging and Farming. The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 418–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, W. J., Hall, G. D., Martin, M. A., and Tarka, S. M. (1989). Authentication ofcacao in Maya vessels using high-performance liquid chromatographic techniques.Journal of Chromatography 466: 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jernigan, E. W. (1986). A nonhierarchical approach to ceramic decoration analysis: A southwestern example.American Antiquity 51: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. (1992). Review of “Organic Contents of Ancient Vessels: Materials Analysis and Archaeological Investigation,” edited by W. R. Biers and P. E. McGovern.American Antiquity 57(4): 743–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, W. D. (1987). A role for ceramic materials science in art, history and archaeology.Journal of Materials Education 9: 676–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, C. C. (1993). Review of “Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology”, edited by W. A. Longacre.American Antiquity 58(4): 777–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, L. M. (1992). Review of “Pottery Technology: Ideas and Approaches”, edited by G. Bronitsky.American Antiquity 57(1): 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, P. E. (1989). Ancient ceramic technology and stylistic change: Contrasting studies from southwest and southeast Asia. In Henderson, J. (ed.),Scientific Analysis in Archaeology, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Monograph No. 19, Oxford, and UCLA Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, Archaeological Research Tools 5, pp. 63–81.

  • Neiman, F. D. (1995) Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages.American Antiquity 60(1): 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. A. (1991). Ceramic frequency and use-life: A highland Mayan case in cross-cultural perspective. In Longacre W. A. (ed.),Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 162–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. F. (1990) Cultural identity and material culture: Afro-Caribbean pottery.Folk 32: 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudemans, T. F. M., and Boon, J. J. (1991). Molecular archaeology: Analysis of charred (food) remains from prehistoric pottery by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 20: 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, M., Koning, A. J., and Smith, A. B. (1985). Gas liquid chromatographic analysis of fatty acids in food residues from ceramics found in the Southwestern Cape, South Africa.Archaeometry 27(2): 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (1987). A functional consideration of a Mississippian domestic vessel assemblage.Southeastern Archaeology 6: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S. (1990). Sociopolitical implications of stylistic variation in the American Southwest. In Conkey, M., and Hastorf, C. (eds.),The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1989). A research design for ceramic use-wear analysis at Grasshopper Pueblo. In Bronitsky, G. (ed.),Pottery Technology, Ideas and Approaches, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., and Skibo, J. M. (1989). A provisional theory of ceramic abrasion.American Anthropologist 91: 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A. W. (1991). Review of “A Pot for All Reasons: Ceramic Ecology Revisited”, edited by C. C. Kolb and L. M. Lackey.American Antiquity 56(2): 378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., Schiffer, M. B., and Kowalski, N. (1989). Ceramic style analysis in archaeology and ethnoarchaeology: Bridging the analytical gap.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 388–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. P., III, Skibo, J. M., and Van Buren, M. (1991). Sherds as tools: The roles of vessel fragments in prehistoric succulent plant processing.North American Archaeologist 12: 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaz Pinto, I., Schiffer, M. B., Smith, S., and Skibo, J. M. (1987). Effects of temper on ceramic abrasion resistance: A preliminary investigation.Archaeomaterials 1: 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rice, P.M. Recent ceramic analysis: 1. Function, style, and origins. J Archaeol Res 4, 133–163 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229184

Key words

Navigation