Advertisement

Construct validity and test-retest reliability of a date rape decision-latency measure

  • Jeffrey A. Bernat
  • Stephanie Stolp
  • Karen S. Calhoun
  • Henry E. Adams
Article

Abstract

In two studies, the construct (convergent and discriminant) validity and test-retest reliability of a date rape decision-latency measure was examined. In Study 1, 174 college men completed measures related to sexual aggression and listened to an audiotaped simulation of a date rape, during which cues of nonconsent and force gradually escalated over time. Participants were instructed to respond, by pressing a button which recorded the latency of their decisions in seconds, if and when they believed the man depicted in the scenario should stop his sexual advances. Results demonstrated positive associations between prolonged decision latencies and sexually aggressive behavior, calloused sexual beliefs, acceptance of interpersonal violence, and sexual promiscuity. In Study 2, initial results were cross-validated in a sample of 102 college men, and discriminant validity was established as decision latencies were unassociated with measures of social desirability, alcohol consumption and drug use. Test-retest reliability assessed over a 2-week interval was .87.

Key words

sexual aggression date rape construct validity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernat, J. A. (1997).Sexual arousal and judgements of terminating unwanted sexual advances in sexually coercive and noncoercive college men, Unpublished masters thesis. Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  2. Bernat, J. A., Wilson, A. E., & Calhoun, K. S. (1997).Sexual coercion history, calloused sexual beliefs, and judgements of sexual coercion in a date rape analogue (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  3. Bernat, J. A., Stolp, S., & Calhoun, K. S. (1997).Sexually coercive men's decisions to terminate an audiotape date rape analogue: Alcohol as a disinhibiting cue (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  4. Blader, J. C., & Marshall, W. L. (1989). Is assessment of sexual arousal in rapists worthwhile? A critique of current methods and the development of a response compatibility approach.Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 569–587.Google Scholar
  5. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.Google Scholar
  6. Calhoun, K. S., Atkeson, B. M., & Resick, P. A. (1982). A longitudinal examination of fear reactions in victims of rape.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 655–661.Google Scholar
  7. Check, J. V. P. (1985).The Hostility Toward Women Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Check, J. V. P., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B., & Barton, S. (1985). On hostile ground.Psychology Today, 19, 56–61.Google Scholar
  9. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Can there be positive effects of participation in pornography experiments?Journal of Sex Research, 20, 14–31.Google Scholar
  10. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, G. C. N. (1990). Prediction of sexual aggression.Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 229–245.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1994). The relationship between sexual aggression inside and outside the laboratory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 375–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1982).Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  14. Kimerling, R., & Calhoun, K. S. (1994). Somatic symptoms, social support, and treatment seeking among sexual assault victims.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 333–340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). The Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual victimization in a national sample of higher education students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Brown, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994).No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American. Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  18. Lohr, B. A., Adams, H. E., & Davis, J. M. (1997). Sexual arousal to erotic and aggressive stimuli in sexually coercive and noncoercive men.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 230–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.Google Scholar
  20. Malamuth, N. M. (1988). Predicting laboratory aggression against male v. female targets: Implications for research on aggression.Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 474–495.Google Scholar
  21. Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1983). Sexual arousal to rape depictions: Individual differences.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92 55–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Malamuth, N. M., & Thornhill, N. W. (1994). Hostile masculinity, sexual aggression, and gender-biased domineeringness in conversations.Aggressive Behavior, 20, 185–193.Google Scholar
  23. Malamuth, N. M., Check, J. V. P., & Briere, J. (1986). Sexual arousal in response to aggression: Ideological, aggressive, and sexual correlates.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 330–340.Google Scholar
  24. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). The characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavy, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Marx, B. P., & Gross, A. M. (1995). Date rape: An analysis of two contextual variables.Behavior Modification, 19, 451–463.Google Scholar
  27. Mosher, D. L., & Anderson, R. D. (1986). Macho personality, sexual aggression, and reactions to guided imagery of realistic rape.Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 77–94.Google Scholar
  28. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation.Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.Google Scholar
  29. Porter, J. F., & Critelli, J. W. (1994). Self-talk and sexual arousal in sexual aggression.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 223–239.Google Scholar
  30. Schewe, P. A., & O'Donohue, W. (1993). Sexual abuse prevention with high risk males: The roles of victim empathy and rape myths.Violence & Victims, 8, 339–351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey A. Bernat
    • 1
  • Stephanie Stolp
    • 1
  • Karen S. Calhoun
    • 1
  • Henry E. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations