Skip to main content
Log in

Histologic and non-histologic factors correlated with survival time in supratentorial astrocytic tumors

  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

One hundred and ninety-two cases of supratentorial astrocytic tumors are classified in 4 groups according to the presence or absence in the pathological material of simple morphological criteria: abnormal cellular density, nuclear pleomorphism, neovascularization, necrosis. Each one of these criteria is strongly correlated with prognosis. Nevertheless only a simple classification in low and high grade lesions has a definite predictive value.

A multivariate analysis utilizing Cox's hazard function confronts these histological findings with a number of clinical and etiological possible factors of prognosis. Age and performance status at the time of diagnosis are the best predictors of survival time. The clinical use of a predictive model derived from Cox's function analysis is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohadon F, Rougier A, Da Silva Nunes Neto D, Sageaux JC, Billeret J, Caillé JM, Imbernon A: CT scan as an aid to the assessment of tumoral volume. Stereotactic cerebral irradiation. INSERM symposium 12, Gabor SZIKLA edit. 1979. Elsevier/North-Holland

  2. Cox DR: regression models and lifes-tables. JR Stat Soc (B) 34:187–220, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gulotta F: Morphological and biological basis for the WHO-classification 1979. Advances and technical standards in Neurosurgery. Edit. Krayenbülh 1981, vol. 8, 123–165 Springer-Verlag

  4. Hildebrand J, Brihaye J: Malignant gliomas; prognostic factors and criteria of response. Cancer therapy: Prognostic factors and criteria of response. Edit. by Saquet New York Raven Press 1975, 309–318

  5. Jelsma R, Bucy PC: Glioblastoma multiform: its treatment and some factors affecting survival. Neurology 20: 116–171, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457–481, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kernohan JW, Mabon RF, Svien HJ, Adson AW: A simplified classification of the gliomas. Proc Mayo Clin 24: 71–75, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kersting G, W üllenberg R: Recurrences of gliomas. A comparitive clinical and morphological study with a note on the histological gradinf of astrocytomas. Modern aspects of Neurosurgery, 1973, vol. 3 Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, Intern. Congr. Ser. nr 278, 116–121

  9. Laws ER, William FT, Marvin BC, Okazaki H: neuro surgical management of law-grade astrocytoma of the cerebral hemispheres. J Neurosurg 61: 665–673, 1984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maire JPh, Célerier D, Desplat A, Caudry M, Leman P: Les facteurs de réponse aux traitements des gliomes malins de l'adulte. Neuro-Chirurgie vol 27, 5: 305–314, 1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Müller W, Afra D, Schröder R: Supra-tentorial recurrences of gliomas. Morphological studies in relation to time intervals with astrocytomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 37: 75–91, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson J.S., Tsudaka, Schoenfeld D, Fulling K, Lamarche J, Peress: Necrosis as a prognostic criterion in malignant supratentorial astrocytic gliomas. Cancer 52: 550–554, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peto R, Peto J: Asymptotically efficient rank unvariant test procedures. JR Stat Soc (A) 135: 185–206, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ringhertz N: Grading of gliomas. Acta path microbiol scand 27:51–64,1950.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rougier A, Da Silva Nunes Neto D, Cohadon F: Tumoral volume assessment: contribution of SEEG. Stereotactic cerebral irradiation. INSERM symposium 12. Gabor Szikla edit. 1979. Elsevier/North-Holland.

  16. Rougier A, Pigneux J, Richaud P: La prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des gliomes malins. Neurochirurgie 27: 315–320,1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rougier A, Pegneux J, Cohadon F: Combined interstitial and external irradiation of gliomas. Acta neurochirurgica, suppl 33:345–353,1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salcman M: Survival in glioblastoma. Historical perspective Neurosurgery 7: 435–439, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schröder R, Bonis G, Müller W, Vorreith M: Statistische beitrage zum grading der gliome. I. Glioblastom anamnese. Acta neurochir (Wien) 18: 43–56, 1968a. Glioblastom Katamnese und erkrankungsalter. Acta neurochir (Wien) 18: 186–200,1968b.

  20. Stochedorph O: How to handle brain tumors classification. Advances in neurosurgery 7: 381–384, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Takeuchi K, Hoshino K: Statistical analysis of factors affecting survival after glioblastoma multiform. Acta neurochir 37: 57–73,1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tooth HH: Some observations on the growth and survival period of intra-cranial tumors based on the records of 500 cases, with special reference of the pathology of the gliomata. Brain 35: 61–108, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP, Alexander E, Batzdorf U, Brooks WH, Hunt WE, Mac Carty CS, Mahaley S, Owens G, Ransohoff J, Robertson JT, Shapiro WR, Smith KR, Wilson CB, Strike TA: Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and notrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N Engl J Med 303: 1323–1329, 1980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohadon, F., Aouad, N., Rougier, A. et al. Histologic and non-histologic factors correlated with survival time in supratentorial astrocytic tumors. J Neuro-Oncol 3, 105–111 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228885

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228885

Key words

Navigation