Veterinary Research Communications

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 19–26 | Cite as

Myotrophic effects of anabolic steroids

  • S. Salmons
Pharmacological Methods for Improving Animal Productivity

Abstract

An anabolic steroid, nandrolone decanoate, was shown to produce increases in the weight, cross-sectional area, tension-generating capacity and mean fibre diameter of a limb muscle, tibialis anterior (TA), in female rabbits. Despite suggestions in the literature of an exerciserelated effect of such drugs, hypertrophy was not observed in TA muscles subjected to chronic electrical stimulation, but was seen in the contralateral control muscles and in the muscles of both hind limbs in unoperated sedentary animals. The effect was confirmed in the TA of female guinea pigs, rats and mice, and could not be explained in terms of an increase in body weight. Compared to TA some other muscles, like EDL, plantaris and soleus in the rabbit, were less sensitive to treatment; others, like pubocaudalis in the rat and mouse, and temporalis in the guinea pig, were more responsive. The myotrophic effects were undiminished in adrenalectomised female rats, and could not therefore have been mediated by interference with the catabolic actions of circulating glucocorticoids, as had been proposed in an earlier hypothesis.

Keywords

Fibre Diameter Hind Limb Tibialis Anterior Anabolic Steroid Decanoate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bass, A., Gutmann, E., Hanzlíková, V. and Syrový, I. 1971. Sexual differentiation of enzymepattern and its conversion by testosterone in the temporal muscle of the guinea pig. Physiol. Bohemoslov, 20: 423–431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bresloff, P., Fox, P.K., Sim, A.W. and Van der Vies, J., 1974. The effect of nandrolone phenylpropionate on14C-leucine incorporation into muscle protein in the rat and rabbit in vivo. Acta Endocrinol., 76: 403–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dohm, G.L., Tapscott, E.B. and Louis, T.M., 1979. Skeletal muscle protein turnover after testosterone administration in the castrated male rat. IRCS Medical Science, 7: 40.Google Scholar
  4. Kochakian, C.D. (ed.), 1976. Anabolic-androgenic steroids. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 43, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Krieg, M. and Voigt, K. D., 1977. Biochemical substrate of androgenic actions at a cellular level in prostate, bulbocavernosus/levator ani and in skeletal muscle. Acta Endocrinol. Suppl., 214: 43–89.Google Scholar
  6. Mayer, M. and Rosen, F. 1975. Interaction of anabolic steroids with glucocorticoid receptor sites in rat muscle cytosol. Am. J. Physiol., 229: 1381–1386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Salmons, S., 1967. An implantable muscle stimulator. J. Physiol., 188: 13–14P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Salmons, S., 1980a. The response of skeletal muscle to different patterns of use — some new developments and concepts. In: D. Pette (Editor), Plasticity of Muscle. Walter de Gruyter Berlin, pp. 387–399.Google Scholar
  9. Salmons, S., 1980b. Functional adaptation in skeletal muscle. Trends in Neuro Sciences, 3: 134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Salmons, S. and Henriksson, J., 1981. The adaptive response of skeletal muscle to increased use. Muscle & Nerve, 4: 94–105.Google Scholar
  11. Salmons, S. and Sréter, F.A., 1976. Significance of impulse activity in the transformation of skeletal muscle type. Nature (London), 263: 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Salmons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, The Medical SchoolUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamU.K.

Personalised recommendations