, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 154–158 | Cite as

Estimation of endurance of structural ceramics by dynamic fatigue testing

  • Yu. I. Dobrinskii
  • V. V. Vikulin
  • V. N. Rudykina
Scientific Research


Results of investigations on determining the level of the control load in certification of ceramic articles at specified operating loads are presented. The parameters of subcritical crack growth, required for the calculation, have been determined using the results of dynamic fatigue testing. It is demonstrated that the parameters of subcritical crack growth determined by dynamic fatigue testing are adequate for use in calculating control loads in cases of operating loads with a high subcritical stress intensity at structural defects (KI <KIc). For long-term conditions of operating loads, the estimates of the endurance made by the present method will be lower than the actual values. The effectiveness of control tests under the specified conditions of the operating load has been demonstrated in an experiment with two batches of specimens of compacted chemically bound silicon nitride (OTM 907). The results of dynamic fatigue testing of silicon nitride are also given.


Silicon Fatigue Nitride Stress Intensity Structural Defect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. S. Pisarenko, “Prospective use of ceramics in mechanical engineering,”Probl. Prochn., No. 12, 3 – 7 (1984).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Trantina and G. Delorenzi, “Method of design of ceramic structures,”nerg. Mash. Ustan., No. 4, 69 – 78 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Palyushnyi and V. Vu, “Probabilistic aspects in the designing of ceramic parts,”nerg. Mash. Ustan., No. 4, 133 – 150 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. T. Neil, A. E. Past, and L. J. Bowen, “Improving the reliability of silicon nitride: a case study,”Adv. Ceram. Mater.,3(3), 225–230 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. G. Evans and S. M. Wiederhorn,Int. J. Fract. Mech., No. 10, 379 (1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J., E. Ritter, P. B. Oates, E. R. Fuller, and S. M. Wiederhorn, “Proof testing of ceramics. Part 1. Experiment. Part 2. Theory,”J. Mater. Sci., No. 15, 2275 – 2295 (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. E. Ritter, “Proof testing of ceramics,”Energy and Ceramics, Proc. 4th Int. Meet. Mod. Ceram. Technol., Amsterdam,6, 632–644 (1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. M. Wiederhorn, in:Ceramics for High Performance Applications, J. J. Burtle, A. E. Gorum, and R. N. Katz (eds.), Brook Hill Publishing Co., Chestnut Hill (1974), pp. 635–665.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. G. Evans and T. G. Langdon,Structural Ceramics [Russian translation], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. T. Gulati, “Crack kinetics during static and dynamic loading,”J. Non-Crystal. Solids,38 – 39, 475–480 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. V. Vikulin, A. I. Dorozhkin, I. V. Ogneva, et al., “Compacted chemically bound silicon nitride and self-reinforced Si3N4 — Si composite,”Ogneupory, No. 9, 29 – 33 (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. G. Evans and E. A. Charles, “Fracture toughness determinations by indentation,”J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,59(78), 371–372 (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. I. Dobrinskii
    • 1
  • V. V. Vikulin
    • 1
  • V. N. Rudykina
    • 1
  1. 1.Obninsk Scientific Association “Tekhnologiya”Russia

Personalised recommendations