Skip to main content
Log in

The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study was done to evaluate a new, simple, non-invasive pain provocation test as an aid to differentiate between low-back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnant women. The test was performed on 72 pregnant women at various stages of pregnancy with or without low-back or posterior pelvic pain. The study was conducted by two physiotherapists with special interest in back pain in pregnancy at a normal antenatal clinic. The test was easy to learn, perform and interpret and was applicable throughout pregnancy. There was a strong correlation between a positive test answer and a history of posterior pelvic pain (P < 0.01, chi-square). There were no side-effects. The test was highly specific and had a high positive prediction value for posterior pelvic pain and a high negative prediction value for low-back pain among pregnant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson D, Roberts SM, Wilson PD (1934) Relaxation of the pelvic joints in pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 58:595–613

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard TN Jr, Cassidy JD (1992) The sacroiliac joint syndrome, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. In: Vleeming A et al (eds) First Interdisciplinary Worl Congress on Low Back Pain and Its Relation to the Sacroiliac Joint, San Diego, November 5-6. ECO, Rotterdam, pp 119–143

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard TN Jr, Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1987) Recognizing specific characteristics of non-specific low back pain. Clin Orthop 217:266–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fast A, Shapiro D, Ducommon E, Friedman L, Bouklas T, Floman Y (1990) Low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine 4:368–371

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen JH (1992) The clinical influence of dysfunction of the sacroiliac joint and the articulation in peripartum women. In: Vleeming A et al. (eds) First Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back Pain and Its Relation to the Sacroiliac Joint, San Diego, November 5-6. ECO, Rotterdam, pp 175–177

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mantle MJ, Greenwood RM, Currey HLF (1977) Backache in pregnancy. Rheumatol Rehabil 16:95–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McLennan A, Green R, Nicolson R, Bath M (1986) Serum relaxin and pelvic pain of pregnancy. Lancet 2:241–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Östgaard HC, Andersson GBJ, Karlsson K (1991) Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine 5:549–552

    Google Scholar 

  9. Östgaard HC, Zetherström G, Roos-Hansson E (1994) Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in relation to pregnancy. Spine 19:894–900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Potter NA, Rothstein J (1985) Inter-tester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Physiotherapy 11:1671–1675

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sturesson B, Selvik G, Udèn A (1989) Movements of the sacroiliac joints. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 14:162–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walde J (1962) Obstetrical and gynecological back and pelvic pains, especially those contracted during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 2:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  13. Young J (1940) Relaxation of the pelvic joints in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Empire 5:493–523

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Östgaard, H.C., Zetherström, G. & Roos-Hansson, E. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women. Eur Spine J 3, 258–260 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02226575

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02226575

Key words

Navigation