Abstract
Three forecasting methodologies were applied to monthly laboratory test count data in order to arrive at a best procedure for forecasting ahead to cover the next fiscal year. The purpose of the forecasting was, first, to aid in reimbursement and income decisions and, second, to assist in operations management decisions within the laboratory itself. The Box-Jenkins ARIMA models were found to be superior in all cases, and forecasts for individual test counts (as opposed to packages of tests billed as a unit) were improved if forecasts for inpatients and outpatients were done separately and then aggregated. With 2 years of experience to go on, the annual forecast error stands at around 4.5%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Makridakis, S., and Wheelwright, S. C.,Forecasting: Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York 1978.
Chambers, J. C. Mullick, S. K., and Smith, D. D., How to choose the right forecasting technique.Harvard Bus. Rev. July–August: 45–74, 1971.
Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M.,Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGee, V.E., Jenkins, E. & Rawnsley, H.M. Statistical forecasting in a hospital clinical laboratory. J Med Syst 3, 161–174 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225111
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225111