Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 323–331 | Cite as

Activity cycles of carpenter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:Camponotus) and subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae:Reticulitermes): Inference from synanthropic records

  • H. G. Fowler
  • R. B. Roberts
Article

Summary

Annual activity cycles of carpenter ants and subterranean termites were extracted from data maintained by cooperative extension service entomologists in Connecticut, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina and Ohio. Autocorrelations suggested a strong cyclic patterning of public complaints, which increased in regularity from south to north. Spectral analysis revealed that the more northern states had complaint peaks occurring at longer frequencies, while more southern states had shorter frequency fluctuations, as expected if climatological factors drive the system. The existence of data such as these can be of great value in designing field experiments.

Keywords

Field Experiment Spectral Analysis Activity Cycle Extension Service Southern State 

Cycles d'activité des fourmis-charpentières (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:Camponotus) et des termites souterrains (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae:Reticulitermes: déduction à partir de relevés synanthropiques

Resume

Les cycles d'activité annuels des fourmis-charpentières et des termites souterrains ont été déduits des relevés poursuivis par le service coopératif des entomologistes dans le Connecticut, le Maryland, le New Jersey, la Caroline du Nord et l'Ohio. Les autocorrélations suggèrent une forte structure cyclique des plaintes issues du public, avec une régularité augmentée du sud au nord. L'analyse spectrale révèle que les Etats les plus au nord présentaient des pics de plaintes à des fréquences plus grandes, alors que les Etats plus au sud avaient des fluctuations de fréquences plus courtes, comme on pouvait s'y attendre si les facteurs climatiques réglaient le système. De tels résultats peuvent être de grande valeur pour les expériences conduites dans la nature.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Box G.E.P., Jenkins G.M., 1970. —Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, edit., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. Broom D.M., 1979. — Methods of detecting and analysing activity rhythms.Biol. Behav., 4, 3–18.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell D.J., Shipp E., 1974. — Spectral analysis of cyclic behavior with examples from field crickets,Telogryllus commodus (Walker).Anim. Behav., 22, 862–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elton C.S., 1924. — Periodic fluctuations in the numbers of animals. Their causes and effects.Br. J. Exp. Biol., 2, 119–163.Google Scholar
  5. Emanuel W.R., West D.C., Shugart H.H. Jr., 1978. — Spectral analysis of forest model time series.Ecol. Model., 4, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Enright J.J., 1965. — The search for rhythmicity in biological time series.J. Theor. Biol., 8, 426–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fowler H.G., 1983. — The biology, economics and control of carpenter ants. In:S.B. Vinson andJ.K. Mauldin (editors):Biology, Economic Importance and Control of Social Insects (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Fowler H.G., Roberts R.B., 1980. — Foraging behavior of the carpenter ant,Camponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidæ), in New Jersey.J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 53, 295–304.Google Scholar
  9. Fowler H.G., Roberts R.B., 1983. — Urban structural pests; carpenter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidæ) displacing subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidæ) in Public Concern.Environ. Entomol. (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins G.M., Watts G.D., 1968. —Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden-Day, edit., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. Platt T., Denmann K.L., 1975. — Spectral analysis in ecology.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 6, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poole R.W., 1978. — The statistical prediction of population fluctuations.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 9, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shelford V.E., 1913. —Animal communities in temperate America. Univ. Chicago Press, edit., Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Vandenbussche E., 1969. — The detection of periodicities in time series. I: Calculation of a periodogram and of a correlogram.Psychol. Belg., 9, 59–77.Google Scholar
  15. Vandenbussche E., 1971. — The detection of periodicities in time series. II: The power of a periodogram and a correlogram to detect periodicities in a relatively short time series.Psychol. Belg., 11, 107–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Masson 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. G. Fowler
    • 1
  • R. B. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology, Cook College, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment StationRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations