Skip to main content

Measuring the productivity of a hospital's clinical laboratory

Abstract

Productivity and productivity improvement are popular topics. People generally agree about the need to improve productivity in this country, yet there is little consensus as to how to achieve productivity improvement or how to measure this improvement. Furthermore, there is misunderstanding regarding the relationships among productivity, profitability, and price recovery. This paper defines and examines these relationships. These concepts are used to evaluate the productivity of a hospital's pathology laboratory. The distinction is made between income statement analysis and the potential role of productivity measurement. The analysis demonstrates that although profitability is declining, productivity improvement is making a positive contribution to profitability. On the other hand, the decline in price recovery more than eliminates the positive contribution of productivity improvement to profitability. This approach is perhaps one of the first serious attempts to measure the productivity of knowledge workers in a service organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ruch, W. A., Measuring knowledge worker productivity.Dimensions of Productivity Research. Proceedings of the Conference on Productivity Research, The American Productivity Center, Houston, Texas, 1980. Vol. 1, pp. 339–355.

  2. Strom, J. S., Bank profitability: A function of productivity and price recovery.American Banker, February 29, 1980.

  3. Finkelstein, S. N., An approach to studying the cost behavior of changing utilization of a hospital laboratory.Hum. Pathol. 11:435–439, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Finkelstein, S. N., Reducing the use of the clinical laboratory: How much can be saved?Clinical Decisions and Laboratory Use. University of Minnesota Continuing Education, D. P. Connelly, E. S. Benson, M. D. Burke, and D. Fenderson eds., University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis, 1982, Vol. 1, pp. 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conn, R. B., Clinical laboratories: Profit center, production industry or patient-care resource?N. Engl. J. Med. 298:422–427, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rabkin, M. T., Editorial. Clinical laboratories: Myth, fact, and future.N. Engl. J. Med. 298:454–455, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. College of American Pathologists,Laboratory Workload Recording Method, College of American Pathologists, Skokie, Ill., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horngren, C. T.,Introduction to Management Accounting, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1978, p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Belcher, J. G., Jr.,The Productivity Management Process, Published by Planning Executives Institute, Oxford, Ohio, and copyrighted by The American Productivity Center, Houston, Texas. Chap. 5 and Appendix B 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thor, C. G., Productivity measurement,Corporate Controller's Manual, 1982 Update (P. J. Wendell, ed.), Warren, Gorham and Lamont, Boston, 1982, pp. 15B—1—36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. HAS/Monitrend (Hospital Administrative Survey), American Hospital Association, 840 N Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Ill. 60611.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paschke, P., Taylor, L.A. & Thor, C.G. Measuring the productivity of a hospital's clinical laboratory. J Med Syst 8, 265–277 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222174

Keywords

  • Income
  • Potential Role
  • Clinical Laboratory
  • Positive Contribution
  • Productivity Measurement