Skip to main content
Log in

The role of constituency groups in policy formulation

Items for a health services research agenda

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Veterans Administration medical care system functions within a larger VA services program that has as its direct constituency many organized veterans' groups The VA system is viewed from the larger perspective of consumer representation in its direction through three effective functions of consumer representation: ownership, control, and oversight. In the VA the Congress and the veterans' groups perform these functions with varying levels of impact on the system. While veterans feel a measure of ownership of the medical care system, they have little voice in its actual operation. Research is needed to describe more fully the actual role of the veteran-client in the system and to explore the possibility that aspects of the system may be adopted outside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alford, R.,Health Care Politics: Ideological and Interest Group Barriers to Reform, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Illich, I.D.,Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health, Pantheon, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krause, E.,Power and Illness: A Political Sociology of Health and Medical Care, Elsevier, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McClure, W.,A Comprehensive Market and Regulatory Cost Containment Strategy for Health Care. Interstudy, Minneapolis, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Silver, G.,A Spy in the House of Medicine, Aspen Systems, Germantown, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Somers, A.R., (ed.),Promoting Health Consumer Education and National Policy, Aspen Systems, Germantown, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brieland, D., Community advisory boards and maximum feasible participation.Am. J. Public Health 61(2):292–296, February 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doong, J.,Consumer Participation in Health Planning: An Annotated Bibliography, U. S. DHEW, Rockville, Md., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lipsky, M., Lounds, M., Citizen participation and health care: Problems of government induced participation.J. Health Politics. Policy and Law 1:85–111, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pecarchik, R., Ricci, E., and Nelson, B., Jr., Potential contribution of consumers to an integrated health care system.Public Health Rep 91(1):72–76 January/February 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen, H., et al. (eds.),The Consumer and the Health Care Systems: Social and Managerial Perspectives, Halsted, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen, G., Contract of lodge practice and its influence on medical attitudes to health insurance.Am. J. Public Health 67(4):374–378, April 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vogel, M., Machine politics and medical care: The city hospital at the turn of the Century.The Therapeutic Revolution: Essays on the Social History of American Medicine (M. Vogel and C. E. Rosenberg, eds.), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolfe, S., and Sherer, H.,Public General Hospitals in Crisis, Coalition of American Public Employees, Washington, D.C., September 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, D.B., and Homer, C.G., The hospital support game revisited.J. Health Politics. Policy and Law 2(2):257–265, Summer 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Federation of American Hospitals,Federation of American Hospitals Annual Report, 1978–79. The Federation, Washington, D. C., 1979, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, W.C., Jr.,Nursing Homes and Public Policy: Drift and Decision in New York State, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dunlop, B.D.,The Growth of Nursing Home Care, Lexington Books, Lexington, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. New York State Moreland Act Commission on Nursing Homes and Residential Facilities,Reimbursement of Nursing Home Property Costs: Pruning the Money Tree. Report Number 2, January 1976.

  20. Spitz, B.,Medicaid Nursing Home Reimbursement in New York, The Urban Institute, Washington, D. C., August 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dobson, A., et al., PSROs: Their current status and their impact to date.Inquiry 15:113–128, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. U. S. DHEW, Office of Research, Demonstrations, and Status,Professional Standards Review Organization 1978 Program Evaluation, HCFA, HEW Pub. No. HCFA-03000, Washington, D. C., January 1979.

  23. Tancredi, L. R., and Woods, J., The social control of medical practice: Licensure versus output monitoring.Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 50:99–125, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murray, C. D., and Glassberg, D. E., Long-term health care for the elderly: The challenge of the next decade.Albany Law Rew. 39:118–159, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sprague, J. G., Commonsense approach needed in dealing with safety.Hospitals 51:67–75 February 1, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. New York State Moreland Act Commission on Nursing Homes and Residential Facilities,Regulating Nursing Home Care: The Paper Tigers, Report Number 1, October 1975.

  27. U. S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs,Assuring Quality of Care in Nursing Homes Participating in Medicare and Medicaid, Hearings 95th Congress, 2nd Session, 1978:1.

  28. Vladeck, B. C., Interest group representation and the HSAs health planning and political theory.Am. J. Public Health 67(1):234ff29, January 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, D. B.,Changing Patterns of Control of Nursing Homes: An Evaluation of the New York State Experience, Draft, Temple University, April 1980.

  30. Abernathy, D. S., and Pearson, D. A.,Regulating Hospital Costs: The Development of Public Policy, Health Administration Press, Washington, D. C., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  31. U. S. Congress, House, Committee on Veterans' Affairs,Hearings on the Veterans' Administration Budget for Fiscal Year 1979, Hearings, 96th Congress, 1st Session, 1979, pp. 15–25.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.B., Shofer, L. The role of constituency groups in policy formulation. J Med Syst 5, 47–57 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222061

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222061

Keywords

Navigation