Skip to main content

A quality of care evaluation measure for emergency medical service systems

Journal of Medical Systems volume 2, pages 281–301 (1978)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper presents the development and validation of an emergency medical service (EMS) systems quality of care evaluation measure. The System Input Severity Measure consists of a et of single and multiple injury survival rates that would be expected to occur in an EMS system classified as providing “baseline” advanced life support services. These expected survival rates were developed by a nationwide panel of emergency medicine experts through the use of the Delphi group opinion surveying technique. Validation of the System Input Severity Measure was a twofold process. First, reliability of the results of the Delphi surveying process was validated by comparing the resultant expected survival rates with Illinois Trauma Registry data. Second, the applicability of the measure was validated using data collected in EMS systems generally recognized to be providing exceptional (either superior or inferior) emergency patient care. It was recognized that the development of a comprehensive, largescale System Input Severity Measure through the use of the Delphi technique alone is impractical. Consequently, a functional relationship between single and multiple injury survival rates was also developed. It appeared that when employed in conjunction with data developed from the Delphi technique, such an approach would make practicable the development of a comprehensive System Input Severity Measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Sacco, W. J., Cowley, R. A., Goldfarb, M. A., Champion, H. R., Gill, W., Long, W. B., and Copes, W. S.,A Prognostic Index in Critical Care Medicine (EATR 4777), Headquarters Edgewood Arsenal, Department of the Army, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, S. P., O'Neill, B., Haddon, W., and Long, W. B., The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.J Trauma 14:187–196, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Public Health Service,Eighth Revision, International Classification of Diseases, Adapted for Use in the United States (PHS-1693), Public Health Service, Health Service and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd, D. R., Computerized trauma registry.J. Trauma 11449–450, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd, D. R., Lowe, R. J., Baker, R. J., and Nyhus, L. M., Trauma registry—new computer method for multifactorial evaluation of a major health problem.J Am. Med. Assoc. 223:422–428, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd, D. R., Lowe, R. J., Scheaff, L. C., Hoecker, C., and Rappaport, D. M., A profile of the trauma registry.J. Trauma 13:316–320, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, D. R., Rappaport, D. M., Marbarger, J. P., Baker, R. J., and Nyhus, L. M., Computerized trauma registry: A new method for categorizing physical injuries.Aerosp. Med. 42:607–615, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dalkey, N. C., Rourke, D. L., Lewis, R., and Snyder D.,Studies in the Quality of Life, Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd, D. R., Dunea, M. M., and Flashner, B. A., The Illinois plan for a statewide system of trauma centers.J. Trauma 13:24–31, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd, D. R., Mains, K. D., and Flashner, B. A., A systems approach to statewide emergency medical care.J. Trauma 13:276–284, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fitts, W. T., Lehr, H. B., and Bitner, R. L., An analysis of 950 fatal injuries.Surgery 56: 663–668, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety, Rating the severity of tissue damage. 1. The abbreviated scale.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 215:277–280, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Headrick, R. W.,A quality of care evaluation measure for emergency medical service systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kendall, M. G.,Rank Correlation Methods. Griffin, London, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel, S.,Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalkey, N. C., Analyses from a group opinion study.Futures 1:541–551, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dalkey, N. C.,The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion (RM-5888-PR), RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dalkey, N. C., personal communication, December 1977.

  19. Semmlow, J. L., and Cone, R., Utility of the injury severity score: A confirmation.Health Serv. Res. 11:45–52, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sacco, W. J., Nyikos, P., Champion, H. R., Long, W. B., Smith, H., Cowley, R. A., and Gill, W.,A Renal Index for Multiple Trauma (EB-TR-74038), Headquarters Edgewood Arsenal, Department of the Amry, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buck, G. L., Brimmer, P. F., and Putzier, L. T.,A Design for the Evaluation of Emergency Care: An Overview of the Pima Health Systems Project (a preliminary draft), Pima Health Systems, Tucson, Arizona, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arizona Hospital Association,Emergency Service Categorization (Memorandum #167), Arizona Hospital Association, Phoenix, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Illinois Department of Public Health,The Critically Injured Patient, Division of Emergency Medical Services and Highway Safety, Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  24. American Association for Automotive Medicine,Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference, Chicago, 1975.

  25. Cowley, R. A., A total emergency medical system for the state of Maryland.M. State Med. J. 24(7):37–45, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Honeywell Information Systems,Honeywell 600/6000 Applicatons Library Guide, Vol. 2—Statistics, Honeywell Information Systems, Inc., Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parr, A. J., Goodnight, J. H., Sall, J. P., and Helwig, J. T.,A User's Guide to SAS 76, SAS Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Cooperative Computing, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA

    R. Wayne Headrick Ph.D., Michael S. Leonard Ph.D. & Jay Goldman D.Sc.

  2. the Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri, USA

    R. Wayne Headrick Ph.D., Michael S. Leonard Ph.D. & Jay Goldman D.Sc.

Authors
  1. R. Wayne Headrick Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael S. Leonard Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jay Goldman D.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Basic research for this paper was completed at the Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia and was supported by the Health Care Systems Design Training Grant (HS00103) of the National Center for Health Services Research, DHEW.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wayne Headrick, R., Leonard, M.S. & Goldman, J. A quality of care evaluation measure for emergency medical service systems. J Med Syst 2, 281–301 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221895

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221895

Keywords

  • Emergency Medical Service
  • Trauma Registry
  • Comprehensive System
  • Emergency Patient
  • Advanced Life Support