Skip to main content
Log in

Anterior lumbar fusion: Results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

One hundred and fifty-one patients underwent anterior interbody lumbar spinal fusion for intractable back pain. A solid bony fusion was obtained in 76%. The method of outcome assessment profoundly affected the results; whereas 68% of patients rated themselves as significantly improved by the procedure, only 40% achieved a good or excellent result on the more objective low-back outcome score. Patients who underwent a second procedure did not do well, and “salvage” surgery is not recommended. Posterior distraction instrumentation neither increased the rate of union nor improved the final results. The rate of fusion was influenced by the presence of a compensation claim. Compensation status and psychological disturbance at presentation were significant prognostic factors. Psychological disturbance at review had a profound effect on the outcome and patient satisfaction ratings. It is recommended that future studies employ a recognised outcome score and that the analysis specifically includes compensation status and psychological disturbance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Capener N (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Br J Surg 19:374–386

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crock HV (1982) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Indications for its use and notes on surgical technique. Clin Orthop 166:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel A (1983) Power, privilege and prestige. Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, pp 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flynn JC, Hoque MA (1979) Anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:1143–1150

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraser RD (1982) A wide muscle-splitting approach to the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 64:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freebody D, Bendall R, Taylor RD (1971) Anterior transperitoneal lumbar fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 53:617–627

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fujimaki A, Crock HV, Bedbrook GM (1982) The results of 150 anterior interbody lumbar spinal fusions performed by two surgeons in Australia. Clin Orthop 165:164–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodship AE, Kenwright J (1985) The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67:650–655

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greenough CG (1993) Results of treatment of lumbar spine disorders — effects of assessment techniques and confounding factors. Acta Orthop Scand 64 (Suppl 251):S126-S129

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greenough CG (1993) Recovery from low back pain: 1–5 year follow-up of 287 injury-related cases. Acta Orthop Scand 64 (Suppl 254):1–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1991) Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain. Spine 16:1068–1074

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17:36–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howe J, Frymoyer JW (1985) The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spine surgery. Spine 10:804–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kozak JA, O'Brien JP (1990) Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine 15:322–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann TR, LaRocca HS (1981) Repeat lumbar surgery. A review of patients with failure from previous lumbar surgery treated by spinal canal exploration and lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 6:615–619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Main CJ (1983) The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res 27:503–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ransford AO, Cairns D, Mooney V (1976) The pain drawing as an aid to the psychologic evaluation of patients with lowback pain. Spine 1:127–134

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rolander SP (1966) Motion of the lumbar spine with special reference to the stabilising effect of posterior fusion. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 90:1–144

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sacks S (1966) Anterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 44:163–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Posterolateral lumbar-spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 54:1195–1204

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Anterior interbody lumbar spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 54:756–768

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tunturi T, Karaja M, Keski-Nisula L, Lapinsuo M, Lepisto P, Paakala T, Patiala H, Rokkanen P (1979) Posterior fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Acta Orthop Scand 50:415–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM (1980) Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 5:117–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zung WWK (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenough, C.G., Taylor, L.J. & Fraser, R.D. Anterior lumbar fusion: Results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors. Eur Spine J 3, 225–230 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221598

Key words

Navigation