Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peer pressure and adolescent substance use

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer influence is regarded as one of the strongest determinants of juvenile delinquency and particularly adolescent substance use. A commonly held view is that social pressure from friends to use drugs and alcohol is a major contributor to substance use. Yet the notion of peer pressure, implied by the association between peer-group associations and drug behavior, is seldom tested empirically. As a crucial test of the group pressure model, this research examines the role of peer pressure in mediating the effect of differential association on individual use. Moreover, few studies examine the nature of the relationship between peers and substance use as it relates to the processes leading toand from use. Drawing on differential association and social learning theories, our research specifies the social processes (socialization, group pressure, social selection, and rationalization) which dictate particular causal pathways leading to and from substance use and then estimates the reciprocal influences among differential association, social pressure from peers, attitudes favorable toward substance use, and individual use. Using the 1977–1979 National Youth Survey panel data, we estimate a covariance structural equation model allowing for correlated measurement error. In the cross-sectional analyses, we find no main effects of overt peer pressure on substance use. Estimation of the reciprocal effects model also reveals that overt peer pressure does not significantly influence substance use and does not mediate the effect of differential association. Instead, the influences of socialization, social selection, and rationalization play significant roles in understanding substance use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (1991a). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency.Criminology 29: 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (1991b). A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 28: 126–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1977).Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 2nd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1985).Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1992).Drugs, Alcohol, and Society: Social Structure, Process and Policy, Wadsworth, Belmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1994).Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation, Roxbury, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L., and Cochran, J. K. (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior.Deviant Behav. 6: 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory.Am. Soc. Rev. 44: 636–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMA Board of Trustees (1991). Drug abuse in the United States: Strategies for prevention.JAMA 265: 2102–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977).Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briar, S., and Piliavin, I. (1965). Delinquency, situational inducements, and commitment to conformity.Soc. Problems 13: 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., and Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents.Dev. Psychol. 22: 521–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R., and Akers, R. (1968). Differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior.Soc. Problems 14: 128–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, S. R. and Warren, B. O. (1987). Religiosity, peer associations, and adolescent marijuana use: A panel study of underlying causal structures.Criminology 25: 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., Kluegel, J. R., and Land, K. C. (1981). Exposition and test of a formal theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 505–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1953).Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement, Free Press, Glencoe, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. (1983).Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory, Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dielman, T. E., Shope, J. T., Butchart, A. T., Campanelli, P. C., and Caspar, R. A. (1989). A covariance structure model test of antecedents of adolescent alcohol misuse and a prevention effort.J. Drug Educ. 19: 337–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dielman, T. E., Butchart, A. T., Shope, J. T., and Miller, M. (1991). Environmental correlates of adolescent substance use and misuse: Implications for prevention programs.Int. J. Addict. 25: 855–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S. (1976).National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave I, 1976, InterUniversity Corsortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., and Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In Hawkins, J. D. (ed.),Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 28–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Knowles, B. A., and Canter, R. J. (1981).The Epidemiology of Delinquent Behavior and Drug Use Among American Adolescents. Vol. 1. The National Youth Survey Project Report No. 14, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, D. J., Vazsonyi, A. T., Torquati, J., and Fridrich, A. (1994). Ethnic and gender differences in risk for early adolescent substance use.J. Youth Adolesc. 23: 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromme, K. (1983). Peer influence on social drinking.Bull. Soc. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2: 50–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D. C. (1971). Observations on the study of crime causation.Am. J. Soc. 77: 262–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., and Pugh, M. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 91: 1170–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., and DeMaris, A. (1993). The family and peer relations of black adolescents.J. Marriage Fam. 55: 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S., and Glueck, E. (1950).Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, The Commonwealth Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonet, M. M. (1994).Counseling the Adolescent Substance User: School-Based Intervention and Prevention, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1987). The methodological adequacy of longitudinal research on crime.Criminology 25: 581–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., and Hirschi, T. (1990).A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. (1987).Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D. (1978). Description of the national youth sample. Project Report Number 2. HEW Grant Number MH27552.The Dynamics of Delinquent Behavior: A National Survey, Behavioral Research Institute, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. F., Tittle, C. R., and Burke, M. J. (1986). Offense-specific models of the differential association process.Soc. Problems 33: 335–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquith, S. M. (1981). Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: An empirical test of differential association theory.Criminology 19: 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F. (1972). Parents, peers, and delinquent action: A test of the differential association perspective.Am. J. Sociol. 78: 562–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E. (1979).Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins: An Integrated Theoretical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E., Marcos, A. C., and Bahr, S. J. (1987). The role of peers in the complex etiology of adolescent drug use.Criminology 25: 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1995).Monitoring the Future Study [press release 13], National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1989).LISREL VII: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods, 4th ed., Scientific Software, Mooresville, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B., Kessler, R. C., and Margulies, R. Z. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis.J. Youth Adolesc. 7: 13–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kercher, K. (1988). Criminology. In Borgatta, E. F., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),The Future of Sociology, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 294–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Akers, R. L., Radosevich, M. J., and Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1982). Norm qualities and adolescent drinking and drug behavior.J. Drug Issues 12: 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Skinner, W. F., Massey, J. L., and Akers, R. L. (1983). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study.Soc. Problems 32: 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Akers, R. L. (1984). Community context and theories of deviant behavior: An examination of social learning and social bonding theories.Sociol. Q. 25: 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1969). Interpreting the causal structure of differential association theory.Soc. Problems 16: 485–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1973). Causal structures underlying the relationship between delinquent involvement and peers.Soc. Sociol. Res. 58: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1978). Deviant involvement, associations and attitudes: Specifying the underlying causal structures.Soc Sociol. Res. 63: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1987).Perspectives on Deviance, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E., and Reed, M. D. (1985). Ties to conventional institutions and delinquency: Estimating reciprocal effects.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 547–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1969).Deviance and Identity, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D. I. (1989).Drugs, Drinking and Adolescents, 2nd ed. Year Book Medical, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, P. (1980). Marijuana: The myth of harmlessness goes up in smoke.Sat. Eve. Post July/Aug. 32–43.

  • Marcos, A. C., Bahr, S. J., and Johnson, R. E. (1986). Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use.Soc. Forces 65: 135–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1989). The dynamics of moral beliefs and minor deviance.Soc. Forces 68: 428–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L., and Heimer, K. (1987). Race, family structure, and delinquency: A test of differential association and social control theories.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 826–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S., and Elliott, D. S. (1990). Longitudinal and cross-sectional data collection and analysis in the study of crime and delinquency.Just. Q. 7: 11–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S., and Elliott, D. S. (1994). Delinquent bonding, moral beliefs, and illegal behaviors: A three-wave panel model.Just. Q. 11: 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, S., and Rooney, J. F. (1988). Children's changing attitudes regarding alcohol: A cross-sectional study.J. Drug Educ. 18: 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr., and Rhodes, A. L. (1964). An empirical test of differential association theory.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 1: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Differential association and delinquency.Soc. Problems 4: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr. (1958). Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior.Pac. Sociol. Rev. 1: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr., and Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965).Group Process and Gang Delinquency, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, S., and Akers, R. L. (1988). Social learning variables and the risk of habitual smoking among adolescents: The Muscatine study.Am. J. Prev. Med. 4: 336–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. C., and Ekland-Olson, S. (1982). On social learning and deviant behavior: A reappraisal of the findings.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, D. E. (1982). “Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory”: A comment and critique.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1924).Criminology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1934).Principles of Criminology, 2nd ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1939).Principles of Criminology, 3rd ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947).Principles of Criminology, 4th ed., Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1973).On Analyzing Crime, edited with an Introduction by Schuessler, K., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H.. and Cressey, D. R. (1970).Criminology, J. B. Lippincott, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., and Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory.Criminology 32: 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R. (1985). The assumption that general theories are not possible. In Meier, R. F. (ed.).Theoretical Methods in Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R., Burke, M. J., and Jackson, E. F. (1986). Modeling Sutherland's theory of differential association: Toward an empirical clarification.Soc. Forces 65: 405–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H., and Killian, L. M. (1987).Collective Behavior, Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M., and Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do?Criminology 29: 851–866.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4018, 30302-4018, Atlanta, Georgia

    Mark D. Reed

  2. Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, 40506-0027, Lexington, Kentucky

    Pamela Wilcox Rountree

Authors
  1. Mark D. Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Wilcox Rountree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1994 American Society of Criminology meetings in Miami, Florida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, M.D., Rountree, P.W. Peer pressure and adolescent substance use. J Quant Criminol 13, 143–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221306

Key words

Search

Navigation