Abstract
This article attempts to illustrate the utility of isoquant map analysis from the field of production theory in microeconomics for the analysis of criminal justice data. Cross-national comparisons of aggregate crime and justice data are used to demonstrate the ability of this technique to reveal important patterns that are often obscured by simple rate comparisons and multivariate treatments such as pooled time-series analysis. For each jurisdiction, aggregate trends in criminal justice processing rates are systematically analyzed as a sequence of two-input production processes: gross imprisonment rates (prison population divided by resident population) can be partitioned in terms of the crime rate and punitiveness (prison population divided by the number of offenses); punitiveness can, in turn, be partitioned in terms of severity and certainty of punishment; certainty of punishment can then be partitioned, seriatim, in terms of the incarceration rate, the conviction rate, and the arrest or clearance rate and the rate at which citizens report crimes. Cross-national data collected by Farrington, Langan, and Wikström are used to illustrate the utility of the method for displaying comparisons of the decomposition of aggregate criminal justice data for the United States, England, and Sweden.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. (eds.) (1978).Deterrence and Incapacitation, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (1988).Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Cunningham, W., Strauchs, J., and Van Meter, C. (1991).Private Security: Patterns and Trends, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Farrington, D. P., and Langan, P. A. (1992). Changes in crime and punishment in England and America in the 1980s.Just. Q. 9: 5–46.
Farrington, D. P., and Wikström, P.-O. H. (1993). Changes in crime and punishment in England and Sweden in the 1980s.Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention 2: 142–170.
Kalish, C. (1988).International Crime Rates, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
LaFranier, S. (1991). U.S. has most prisoners per capita in the world: One million are behind bars, study says.Wash. Post Jan. 5: A3.
Lynch, J. P. (1988). A comparison of prison use in England and Wales, Canada, the United States and West Germany: A limited test of the punitiveness hypothesis.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 79: 180–217.
Lynch, J. P. (1993). A cross-national comparison of the length of custodial sentences for serious crimes.Just. Q. 10: 639–659.
Lynch, J. P. (1995). Crime in international perspective. In Wilson, J. Q., and Petersilia, J. (eds.),Crime, ICS Press, San Francisco, pp. 11–38.
Maurer, M. (1991).Americans Behind Bars: A Comparison of International Rates of Incarceration, The Sentencing Project, Washington, DC.
Mayhew, P. (1985).Residual Burglary: A Comparison of the United States, Canada, and England and Wales (Final report to the National Institute of Justice), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Moitra, S. D. (1986). Crime and imprisonment trends: An analysis by individual crime-types.Int. J. Comp. Appl. Crim. Just. 10: 95–106.
Ohlin, L. E., and Remington, F. J. (eds) (1993).Discretion in Criminal Justice: The Tension Between Individualization and Uniformity, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
Skogan, W. (1993). Reactions to crime in a cross-national perspective. In Alvazzi del Frate, A., Zvekic, U., and van Dijk, J. (eds.),Understanding Crime: Experiences of Crime and Crime Control, United Nations Inter-regional Crime and Justice Institute, Rome,
van Dijk, J. and Mayhew, P. (1993). Criminal victimization in the industrialized world: Key findings of the 1989 and 1992 International Crime Surveys. In Alvazzi del Frate, A., Zvekic, U., and van Dijk, J. (eds.),Understanding Crime: Experiences of Crime and Crime Control, United Nations Inter-regional Crime and Justice Institute, Rome.
Viderhous, G. (1978). Methodological problems confronting cross-cultural criminological research using official data.Hum. Relat. 3: 229–247.
Weston, J. F. and Brigham, E. F. (1978).Managerial Finance, 6th ed., Dryden Press, Hinsdale, IL.
Young, W. and Brown, M. (1993). Cross-national comparisons of imprisonment. In Tonry, M. (ed.).Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forst, B., Lynch, J.P. The decomposition and graphical analysis of crime and sanctions data: A cross-national application. J Quant Criminol 13, 97–119 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221304
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221304