Journal of World Prehistory

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 453–510 | Cite as

The prehistory of the Austronesian-speaking peoples: A view from language

  • Robert Blust
Article

Abstract

Prior to the European colonial expansions of the past several centuries the Austronesian (AN) language family had the greatest geographical extent of any on earth, including in its territory areas that had never previously been settled. Although predominantly distributed in a tropical or subtropical environment, AN-speaking peoples exhibit a wide range of physical types, material cultures, and types of social and political organization. This paper addresses ways in which linguistic comparison can contribute toward answering such questions as the following: Where was the AN homeland? What was the nature of early AN material culture, social and political organization? What can we infer about early AN pathology? How did early AN speakers view the spirit world? It concludes with a discussion of culture loss, many examples of which can be inferred both from the Pacific and from insular Southeast Asia.

Key words

Austronesian Pacific Southeast Asia linguistics culture-history 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelaar, K. A. (1989). Malay influence on Malagasy: Linguistic and culture-historical implications.Oceanic Linguistics 28: 1–46.Google Scholar
  2. Adelaar, K. A. (1994). The history of thing, animal, person and related concepts in Malay. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. D. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Bellwood, P. (1979).Man's Conquest of the Pacific: The Prehistory of Southeast Asia and Oceania, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bellwood, P. (1985).Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago, Academic Press, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Bellwood, P. (1991). The Austronesian dispersal and the origin of languages.Scientific American 265: 88–93.Google Scholar
  6. Bellwood, P. (1994). An archaeologist's view of language macrofamily relationships.Oceanic Linguistics 33: 391–406.Google Scholar
  7. Benedict, P. K. (1942). Thai, Kadai, and Indonesian: A new alignment in South-eastern Asia.American Anthropologist 44: 576–601.Google Scholar
  8. Benedict, P. K. (1967).Austro-Thai Language and Culture, with a Glossary of Roots, Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  9. Benedict, P. K. (1990).Japanese/Austro-Tai, Karoma, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  10. Blust, R. (1970). Proto-Austronesian addenda.Oceanic Linguistics 9: 104–162.Google Scholar
  11. Blust, R. (1972). Note on PAN*qa(R)(CtT)a ‘outsiders, alien people’.Oceanic Linguistics 11: 166–171.Google Scholar
  12. Blust, R. (1973). Additions to “Proto-Austronesian addenda” and “Proto-Oceanic addenda with cognates in non-Oceanic Austronesian languages” -II.Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 33–61. (Published by the Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.)Google Scholar
  13. Blust, R. (1974).The Proto-North Sarawak Vowel Deletion Hypothesis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  14. Blust, R. (1976). Austronesian culture history: Some linguistic inferences and their relations to the archaeological record.World Archaeology 8: 19–43. Reprinted with minor additions in NUSA3: 25–37 (1977) and in van de Velde, P. (ed.), (1984),Prehistoric Indonesia: A Reader, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 217–241.Google Scholar
  15. Blust, R. (1977). The Proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian subgrouping: A progress report.Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 1–15.Google Scholar
  16. Blust, R. (1978). Eastern Malayo-Polynesian: A subgrouping argument.Pacific Linguistics C61: 181–234.Google Scholar
  17. Blust, R. (1980a). Early Austronesian social organization: The evidence of language.Current Anthropology 21: 205–247 (with comments and reply).Google Scholar
  18. Blust, R. (1980b). Austronesian etymologies.Oceanic Linguistics 19: 1–181.Google Scholar
  19. Blust, R. (1981). Linguistic evidence for some early Austronesian taboos.American Anthropologist 83: 285–319.Google Scholar
  20. Blust, R. (1982). The linguistic value of the Wallace Line.Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 138: 231–250.Google Scholar
  21. Blust, R. (1983). A Linguistic Key to the Early Austronesian Spirit World. Keynote address presented to the Third Eastern Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, May 6–7, 1983. Unpublished manuscript, 96 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Blust, R. (1983/1984). Austronesian etymologies-II.Oceanic Linguistics 22/23: 29–149.Google Scholar
  23. Blust, R. (1984/1985). The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective.Asian Perspectives 26: 45–67.Google Scholar
  24. Blust, R. (1986). Austronesian etymologies-III.Oceanic Linguistics 25: 1–123.Google Scholar
  25. Blust, R. (1986/87). Language and culture history: Two case studies.Asian Perspectives 27: 205–227.Google Scholar
  26. Blust, R. (1987). Lexical reconstruction and semantic reconstruction: The case of Austronesian “house” words.Diachronica 4, 1-2: 79–106.Google Scholar
  27. Blust, R. (1988). Dempwolff's contributions to Austronesian linguistics.Africa und übersee 71: 90–96.Google Scholar
  28. Blust, R. (1989). Austronesian etymologies-IVOceanic Linguistics 29: 111–180.Google Scholar
  29. Blust, R. (1993a). Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian.Oceanic Linguistics 32: 241–293.Google Scholar
  30. Blust, R. (1993b). Austronesian sibling terms and culture history.Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Landen Volkenkunde 149: 22–76 (also published in Pawley and Ross, 1994, pp. 31–72).Google Scholar
  31. Blust, R. (1994). The Austronesian settlement of mainland Southeast Asia. In Adams, K. L., and Hudak, T. J. (eds.), Papers from the Second Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 25–83.Google Scholar
  32. Blust, R. (1995). The position of the Formosan aboriginal languages: Method and theory in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Li, P. J. K., Ho, D. A. and Tseng, C. Y. (eds.),International Symposium on Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan, Proceedings, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taipei s(in press).Google Scholar
  33. Blust, R. (1996). Beyond the Austronesian homeland: The Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Blust, R. (In press).Austronesian languages, Cambridge Language Surveys, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  35. Cauquelin, J. (1991).Dictionnaire Puyuma-Francais, Textes et Documents Nousantariens, école Francaise d'ExtrÊme-Orient, Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Chang, K. C. (1957). Yuanshan chutu de yi ke ren chi.Kaogu Renlei Xuekan 9, 10: 146–47 (cited in Sagart, 1994).Google Scholar
  37. Chang, K. C. (1986).The Archaeology of Ancient China (4th ed.), Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  38. Chang, K. C. (1989). Taiwan archaeology in Pacific perspective. In Chang, K. C., Li, K. C., Wolf, A. P., and Yin, A. C. (eds.),Anthropological Studies of the Taiwan Area: Accomplishments and Prospects, National Taiwan University, Taipei, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
  39. Chen, C. L. (1988).Material Culture of the Formosan Aborigines (3rd ed.), Southern Materials Center, Inc., Taipei.Google Scholar
  40. Chowning, A. (1991). Proto-Oceanic culture: The evidence from Melanesia. In Blust, R. (ed.),Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian Languages and Linguistics in Honour of George W. Grace, Pacific Linguistics C-117, pp. 43–75.Google Scholar
  41. Cole, F.-C. (1968).The Wild Tribes of the Davao District, Mindanao. Field Museum of Natural History Publication 170, Anthropological Series 12(2). Chicago. (Originally published in 1913).Google Scholar
  42. Collins, J. T., and Novotny, R. (1991). Etymology, entomology, and nutrition: Another word from Pigafetta.Cakalele 2: 123–132.Google Scholar
  43. Crowley, T (1994). Proto who drank kava? In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
  44. Dahl, O. C. (1976).Proto-Austronesian, 2nd ed., Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph, 15, Curzon Press, London.Google Scholar
  45. Daniels, J., and Daniels, C. (1993). Sugarcane in prehistory.Archaeology in Oceania 28: 1–7.Google Scholar
  46. Darlington, P. J., Jr. (1980).Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals, Robert E. Krieger, Huntington, New York. (Originally published in 1957).Google Scholar
  47. Dempwolff, O. (1934–1938).Vergleichende Lautlehre des Austronesischen Wortschatzes. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen. (1) Induktiver Aufbau einer Indonesischen Ursprache,15 (1934); (2) Deduktive Anwendung des Urindonesischen auf Austronesische Einzelsprachen,17 (1937); (3) Austronesisches Wörterverzeichnis,19 (1938). Dietrich Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  48. Dixon, R. B. (1932). The problem of the sweet potato in Polynesia.American Anthropologist 34: 40–66.Google Scholar
  49. Doran, E., Jr. (1971). The sailing raft as a great tradition. In Riley, C. L., Kelley, J. C., Pennington, C. W., and Rands, R. L. (eds.),Man Across the Sea: Problems of Pre-Columbian Contacts, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 115–138.Google Scholar
  50. Doran, E., Jr. (1981).Wangka: Austronesian Canoe Origins, Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
  51. Dutton, T. (1994). Sago and related items in early Austronesian vocabulary. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 101–125.Google Scholar
  52. Dyen, I. (1956). Language distribution and migration theory.Language 32: 611–26.Google Scholar
  53. Dyen, I. (1965).A Lexicostatistical Classification of the Austronesian Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 31(1) Memoir 19. Waverly Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  54. Ferrell, R. (1969).Taiwan Aboriginal Groups: Problems in Cultural and Linguistic Classification. Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Monograph 17, Nankang, Taipei.Google Scholar
  55. Fischer, J. L. (with the assistance of Fischer, A.(M). (1970).The Eastern Carolines, Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  56. Forster, J. R. (1778).Observations Made During a Voyage Round the World, London.Google Scholar
  57. Fox, J. J. (1984/1985). Possible models of early Austronesian social organization.Asian Perspectives 26: 35–44.Google Scholar
  58. Fox, J. J. (1994). Who's who in Ego's generation: Probing the semantics of Malayo-Polynesian kinship classification. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 127–139.Google Scholar
  59. Frazer, J. G. (1960).The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (1-volume abridged edition), Macmillan, New York. (Originally published in 1922.)Google Scholar
  60. Friedman, J. (1981). Notes on structure and history in Oceania.Folk 23: 275–295.Google Scholar
  61. Garvan, J. M. (1964).The Negritos of the Philippines, ed. by H. Hochegger. Wiener Beiträ;ge zur Kulturgeschichte und Linguistik 14, Berger, Vienna.Google Scholar
  62. Geraghty, E. (1990). Proto-Eastern Oceanic*R and its reflexes. In Davidson, J. H. C. S. (ed.),Pacific Island Languages: Essays in Honour of G. B. Milner, University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, pp. 51–93.Google Scholar
  63. Geurtjens, H. (1921).Woordenlijst der Keieesche taal, Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 63, Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  64. Grace, G. W. (1969). A Proto-Oceanic finder list.Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 39–84. Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  65. Grace, G. W. (1985). Oceanic subgrouping: Retrospect and prospect. In Pawley, A., and Carrington, L. (eds.),Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress, Pacific Linguistics C-88, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  66. Green, R. (1979). Lapita. In Jennings, J. D. (ed.),The Prehistory of Polynesia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 27–60.Google Scholar
  67. Green, R. (1994).Oceanic Settlement Patterns and Society: A Linguistic and Archaeological Perspective. Unpublished manuscript, 37 pp.Google Scholar
  68. Greenberg, J. H. (1957). The problem of linguistic subgroupings. In Greenberg, J. H.Essays in Linguistics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
  69. Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1995).Island Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. England. (in press).Google Scholar
  70. Harrisson, T. (1959).World Within: A Borneo Story, The Cresset Press, London.Google Scholar
  71. Hayden, B. (1983). Social characteristics of early Austronesian colonisers.Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 4: 123–134.Google Scholar
  72. Hicks, D. (1976).Tetum Ghosts and Kin: Fieldwork in an Eastern Indonesian Community, Explorations in World Ethnology. Mayfield Publishing Co., Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  73. Hose, C., and McDougall, W. (1912).The pagan tribes of Borneo (2 vols.), Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  74. Houtman, F. de. (1603).Spraeck ende Woord-Boeck, Inde Maleysche ende Madagaskarsche Talen met vele Arabische ende Turcsche Woorden. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  75. Ivens, W. G. (1972) [1927].Melanesians of the South-east Solomon Islands, Benjamin Blom, Inc., New York. (Originally published in 1927.)Google Scholar
  76. Josselin de Jong, J. P. B. de. (1977). The Malay archipelago as a field of ethnological study. In de Josselin de Jong, P. E. (ed.),Structural anthropology in the Netherlands, a reader, Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal, Land- en Volkenkunde Translation Series, 17, Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 166–182. (Originally published in 1935.)Google Scholar
  77. Kahlenberg, M. H. (1977).Textile Traditions of Indonesia, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  78. Kern, H. (1889). Taalkundige gegevens ter bepaling van het stamland der Maleisch-Polynesische volken.Verslagen en Mededeelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, afdeeling Letterkunde,3: 270–287. Reprinted inVerspreide Geschriften 6: 105–120 (1917).Google Scholar
  79. Kirch, P. V. (1988a). Problems and issues in Lapita archaeology. In Kirch, P. V., and Hunt, T. L. (eds.),Archaeology of the Lapita Cultural Complex: A Critical Review, Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum Research Report 5, Burke Museum, Seattle, pp. 157–165.Google Scholar
  80. Kirch, P. V. (1988b). The Talepakemalai Lapita site and Oceanic prehistory.National Geographic Research 4: 328–342.Google Scholar
  81. Kroeber, A. L. (1919). Kinship in the Philippines.Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 19: 69–84.Google Scholar
  82. Lebar, F. M. (ed. and compiler). (1972).Ethnic groups of insular Southeast Asia 1:Indonesia, Andaman Islands, and Madagascar, Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  83. Lebar, F. M. (ed. and compiler). (1975).Ethnic groups of insular Southeast Asia 2:Philippines and Formosa, Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  84. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969).The Elementary Structures of Kinship (trans, by J. H. Bell, J. R. von Sturmer and R. Needham), Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  85. Li, P. J. K. (1993). The ritual songs of Pashta?ay in Saisiyat revisited.Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 64.4: 891–933. (In Chinese, with an English summary.)Google Scholar
  86. Li, P. J. K. (1994). Some plant names in Formosan languages. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 241–266.Google Scholar
  87. Lichtenberk, F. (1986). Leadership in Proto-Oceanic society: Linguistic evidence.Journal of the Polynesian Society 95: 341–356.Google Scholar
  88. Lichtenberk, F. (1994). The raw and the cooked: Proto Oceanic terms for food preparation. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 267–288.Google Scholar
  89. Ling, M. (1960). Bark cloth in Taiwan and the circum-Pacific areas.Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica,9: 313–360. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  90. Lynch, J. (1991). Pigs and dogs in island Melanesia. In Pawley, A. (ed.),Man and a Half: Essays in Pacific Anthropology and Ethnobiology in Honour of Ralph Bulmer, The Polynesian Society, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 421–432.Google Scholar
  91. Mahdi, W. (1994). Some Austronesian maverick protoforms with culture-historical implications.Oceanic Linguistics 33: 167–229.Google Scholar
  92. Marschall, W. (1968). Metallurgie und frühe Besiedlungsgeschichte Indonesiens. In Fröhlich, W. (ed.),Beiträ;ge zur Völkerkunde Südostasiens und Ozeaniens, Ethnologica 4, Brill, Köln, pp. 29–263.Google Scholar
  93. Marshall, M. (1984). Structural patterns of sibling classification in Oceania.Current Anthropology 25: 597–637 (with comments and reply).Google Scholar
  94. McManus, E. G. (1977).Palauan-English Dictionary (edited and expanded by L. S. Josephs, with the assistance of M. Emesiochel), PALI Language Texts: Micronesia, University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  95. Meacham, W. (1984/1985). On the improbability of Austronesian origins in south China.Asian Perspectives 26: 89–106.Google Scholar
  96. Merrill, E. D. (1954).Plant Life of the Pacific World, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  97. Milke, W. (1961). Beiträ;ge zur ozeanischen Linguistik.Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 86: 162–182.Google Scholar
  98. Milke, W. (1968). Proto-Oceanic addenda.Oceanic Linguistics 7: 147–171.Google Scholar
  99. Mills, R. F. (1981). Additional addenda. In Blust, R. A. (ed.),Historical Linguistics in Indonesia 1, NUSA: Linguistic Studies in Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia 10, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  100. Murdock, G. P. (1949).Social Structure, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  101. Murdock, G. P. (1964). Genetic classification of the Austronesian languages: Key to Oceanic culture history.Ethnology 3: 117–126.Google Scholar
  102. Murdock, G. P. (1968). Patterns of sibling terminology.Ethnology 7: 1–24.Google Scholar
  103. Nooy-Palm, C. H. M. (1972). Mentaweians. In Lebar, F. M. (ed. and compiler),Ethnic Groups of Insular Southeast Asia 1: Indonesia, Andaman Islands and Madagascar, Human Relations Area Files Press, New Haven, pp. 41–44.Google Scholar
  104. Oliver, D. L. (1989).Oceania: The Native Cultures of Australia and the Pacific Islands (2 vols.), University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  105. Pallesen, A. K. (1985).Culture Contact and Language Convergence, Linguistic Society of the Philippines, Manila.Google Scholar
  106. Pawley, A. (1976).Some new Oceanic Lexical Comparisons. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  107. Pawley, A. (1982). Rubbishman commoner, Big-man chief? Evidence for hereditary chieftainship in Proto-Oceanic. In Siikala, J. (ed.),Oceanic Studies: Essays in Honour of Aarne A. Koskinen, Finnish Anthropological Society, Helsinki, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
  108. Pawley, A., and Green, R. C. (1984). The Proto-Oceanic language community.Journal of Pacific History 19: 123–146.Google Scholar
  109. Pawley, A., and Pawley, M. (1994). Early Austronesian terms for canoe parts and seafaring. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 329–361.Google Scholar
  110. Pawley, A., and Ross, M. (1993). Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history.Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 425–459.Google Scholar
  111. Pawley, A. K., and M. D. Ross (eds.). (1994).Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change. Pacific Linguistics C-127. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  112. Pietrusewsky, M. (1992). Preliminary observations on the Suo-kang burials. In Tsang C. H.,Archaeology of the P'eng-hu Islands, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Special Publication 95, Taipei, pp. 341–352.Google Scholar
  113. Polosmak, N. (1994). A mummy unearthed from the Pastures of Heaven.National Geographic Magazine 186.4: 80–103.Google Scholar
  114. Ray, S. H. (1913). The languages of Borneo.The Sarawak museum Journal 1(4): 1–196.Google Scholar
  115. Rehg, K. (1992). Micronesian Words for “Dog”: An Ethnolinguistic Puzzle. Paper presented to the Austronesian Circle of Hawaii. Honolulu, April 9, 1992.Google Scholar
  116. Reid, L. A. (1984/1985). Benedict's Austro-Tai hypothesis-an evaluation.Asian Perspectives 26: 19–34.Google Scholar
  117. Reid, L. A. (1987). The early switch hypothesis: Linguistic evidence for contact between Negritos and Austronesians.Man and Culture in Oceania 3 [Special Issue, Ishikawa E., and Ohtsuka, R. (eds.)]: 41–59.Google Scholar
  118. Reid, L. A. (1994a). Morphological evidence for Austric.Oceanic Linguistics 33: 323–344.Google Scholar
  119. Reid, L. A. (1994b). Terms for rice agriculture and terrace building in some Cordilleran languages of the Philippines. In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 363–388.Google Scholar
  120. Reid, L. A. (1994c). Unravelling the linguistic histories of Philippine Negritos. In Dutton, T. E., and Tryon, D. T. (eds.),Language Contact and Change in the Austronesian World, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 443–475.Google Scholar
  121. Reland, H. (1708).Dissertationum miscellanearum partes tres (3 vols.), Trajecti ad Rhenum.Google Scholar
  122. Richards, A. (1981).An Iban-English Dictionary, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  123. Rivers, W. H. R. (1912). The disappearance of useful arts. In Castrén, O., Hirn, Y., Lagerborg, R., and Wallensköld, A. (eds.),Festskrift tillegnad Edvard Westermarck, Helsingfors, 109–130.Google Scholar
  124. Rivers, W. H. R. (1968).The History of Melanesian Society (2 vols.), Anthropological Publications, Oosterhout, Holland.Google Scholar
  125. Ross, M. (1994).Proto Oceanic Terms for Meteorological Phenomena. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (7-ICAL) Noordwijk aan Zee, Holland, August 27–31, 1994.Google Scholar
  126. Ross, M. (1995).*kanaηma wasa: Reconstructing food plant terms and associated terminologies in Proto Oceanic. In Lynch, J. (ed.),Papers from the First International Conference on Oceanic Languages, Port Vila, Vanuatu, July 4–9, 1993. Pacific Linguistics, Series C (in press).Google Scholar
  127. Roth, H. L. (1896).The Natives of Sarawak and British North Borneo (2 vols.), Truslove and Hanson, London.Google Scholar
  128. Rousseau, J. (1979). Kayan stratification.Man 14: 215–236.Google Scholar
  129. Rubinstein, D. H. (1989).Fabric Treasures of the Philippines: A Descriptive Catalogue for the Exhibition at the ISLA Center, April 6–May 11, 1989, ISLA Center for the Arts, University of Guam, Agaña.Google Scholar
  130. Ruhlen, M. (1987).A Guide to the World's Languages 1: Classification. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  131. Sagart, L. (1993). Chinese and Austronesian: Evidence for a genetic relationship.Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21: 1–62.Google Scholar
  132. Sagart, L. (1994). Proto-Austronesian and Old Chinese evidence for Sino-Austronesian.Oceanic Linguistics 33: 271–308.Google Scholar
  133. Sapir, E. (1968). Time perspective in aboriginal American culture: A study in method. In Mandelbaum, D. G. (ed.),Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 389–467. (Originally published in 1916.)Google Scholar
  134. Saussure, F. de. (1959).Course in General Linguistics (edited by Bally, C., and Sechehaye, A. in collaboration with A. Riedlinger; Translated with an Introduction and Notes by W. Baskin), McGraw-Hill, New York. (Originally published in 1916.)Google Scholar
  135. Schmidt, W. (1906).Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentralasiens und Austronesiens, Friedrich Vieweg and Son, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
  136. Schröder, E. E. W. G. (1917).Nias, Ethnographische, Geographische en Historische Aanteekeningen en Studien (2 vols.), Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  137. Scott, N. C. (1956).A Dictionary of Sea Dayak, University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, London.Google Scholar
  138. Tolstoy, P. (1994).Cladistics and the divergent evolution of bark cloth technology in the central Pacific. Paper presented at the November 1994 Chacmool Conference, Calgary, Canada. Unpublished manuscript, 41 pp.Google Scholar
  139. Tsang, C. H. (1992).Archaeology of the P'eng-hu Islands, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica Special Publications 95, Taipei.Google Scholar
  140. Tsuchida, S. (1976).Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic Phonology, Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph Series 5, Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  141. Tsuchida, S. (1980). Puyuma (Tamalakaw dialect) vocabulary. InKuroshio No Minzoku, Bunka, Gengo, Tokyo, pp. 183–307.Google Scholar
  142. Tsuchida, S., Yamada, Y., and Moriguchi, T. (1991).Linguistic materials of the Formosan Sinicized Populations 1: Siraya and Basai, Department of Linguistics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  143. Vavilov, N. I. (1931). Mexico and central America as a basic center of origin of the cultivated plants of the New World.Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding 26: 135–199.Google Scholar
  144. Verheijen, J. A. J. (1984).Plant Names in Austronesian Linguistics, NUSA: Linguistic Studies in Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia 20, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar
  145. Warner, J. N. (1962). Sugar cane: An indigenous Papuan cultigen.Ethnology 1: 405–411.Google Scholar
  146. Wilkinson, R. J. (1959).A Malay-English dictionary (Romanised; 2 parts), Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  147. Wolff, J. U. (1994). The place of plant names in reconstructing Proto Austronesian. In Pawley, A. K. and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 511–540.Google Scholar
  148. Wouden, F. A. E. van. (1968).Types of Social Structure in Eastern Indonesia (translated by R. Needham), Nijhoff, The Hague. (Originally published in 1935.)Google Scholar
  149. Yan, W. M. (1990). China's earliest rice agriculture remains.Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 10: 118–126.Google Scholar
  150. Yen, D. E. (1971). Construction of the hypothesis for distribution of the sweet potato. In Riley, C. L., Kelley, J. C., Pennington, C. W., and Rands, R. L. (eds.),Man across the Sea: Problems of Pre-Columbian Contacts, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 328–342.Google Scholar
  151. Yen, D. E. (1974).The Sweet Potato and Oceania: An Essay in Ethnobotany, Bernice E Bishop Museum Bulletin 236, Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  152. Zorc, R. D. P. (1971). Proto-Philippine finder lists. MS., Cornell University.Google Scholar
  153. Zorc, R. D. P. (1994). Austronesian culture history through reconstructed vocabulary (an overview). In Pawley, A. K., and Ross, M. (eds.),Austronesian Terminologies: Continuity and Change, Pacific Linguistics C-127, pp. 541–594.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Blust
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of HawaiiHonolulu

Personalised recommendations