Skip to main content
Log in

A simple method of establishing tolerances for pesticide residues in different countries

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the early stage of using pesticides, some countries that do not have sufficient knowledge of the safety of pesticides may feel inadequate to establish tolerances for pesticide residues. Some published tolerances indicate that levels set for the same pesticides in different countries may vary from a few times to as high as 50 times for lindane. Furthermore, some of the tolerances are so low that they are not practical for agricultural uses. To solve these problems, the following equation was devised and accepted in Taiwan for establishing tolerances for nine pesticides applied to several vegetables. Tolerance=Id×Wb/Wf×Ft×√Pt Where Id is ADI (acceptable daily intake) expressed in milligrams of residues per kilogram of body weight, and obtained from the correlation of U.S. tolerances and ADI values published by FAO/WHO; Wb (in kg) is the body weight; Wf (in kg) is the daily food consumption; Ft is the percent of food treated; and Pt is the percent of a pesticide used on each group of crops. With the consideration of toxicological data, properties of pesticides, safety factors, and dissipation of residues on treated crops, temporary tolerances were established in Taiwan for parathion (0.75 ppm), methyl parathion (0.75 ppm), diazinon (0.5 ppm), lindane (5 ppm), dicofol (5 ppm), malathion (5 ppm), dichlorvos (0.5 ppm), naled (1 ppm) and mevinphos (0.75 ppm), and time intervals between the last application and harvest time were set at 14, 7, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, and 1 day, respectively. Final tolerances may be established after further studies on residues in commercial fields, in food markets, and in prepared food. Using this method of establishing tolerances, the only experimental data needed are local residue dissipation rates for each pesticide on treated crops. Other data can be obtained either from basic manufacturers or from published or unpublished statistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon.: Suggested guide for the use of insecticides to control insects affecting crops, livestock, households, stored products, forests, and forest products. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 331 (1968).

  • Anon.: Pesticide residues in food. Report of the 1968 joint FAO/WHO meeting. Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1969a).

  • Anon.: Taiwan food balance sheet. Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction, Taiwan, Republic of China (1969b).

  • Anon.: Establishment of tolerances for pesticide residues in specified foods in Japan. Food & Chemistry Section, Environmental Sanitation Bureau, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Japan (1970).

  • Anon.: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. Plant Health Newsletter, Series B. No. 76 (1973a).

  • Anon.: Pesticide residue tolerances. Japanese Ministry of Health & Welfare, Notices No. 2 & No. 3 (1973b).

  • Beneš, V. and V. černa: Tolerances of pesticide residues in Czechoslovakia. Residue Reviews33, 75 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Pietri-Tonelli, P.: The regulation of pesticides in Italy. Residue Reviews27, 1 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli, M., and G. de Falco: The regulation of pesticides in Argentina. Residue Reviews44, 39 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markkula, M.: Regulation of pesticides in Finland. Residue Reviews48, 117 (1973).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melnikov, N. N., and M. G. Shevchenko: Hygienic normalization of pesticide residues and their tolerance levels in foodstuffs in the U.S.S.R. Residue Reviews35, 1 (1971).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, C. E.: Analysis of pesticides by the thin-layer chromatographic-enzyme inhibition technique. Residue Reviews43, 105 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, C. E.: Analysis of pesticides by the thin-layer chromatographic-enzyme inhibition technique, Part II, Residue Reviews50, 43 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, B. L.: Toxicology of pesticides to establish proof of safety. In R. White-Stevens (ed.): Pesticides in the environment. Vol. I, Part II, pp. 411–56. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobiecki, T.: Pesticide regulations and residue problems in Poland. Residue Reviews33, 1 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, I. H., and J. Bot: Pesticide regulation in South Africa. Residue Reviews35, 49 (1971).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The principle of this method was presented by the senior author as an invitation paper at the 1971 annual meeting of the Entomological Society of America.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, Y.P., Horng, W.H., Hsieh, P.S. et al. A simple method of establishing tolerances for pesticide residues in different countries. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 5, 279–293 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220910

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220910

Keywords

Navigation