Skip to main content
Log in

Liming and deep ripping responses for a range of field crops

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grain yields were measured over 2 seasons from a range of field crops following liming and deep ripping an acid and compacted soil in north-eastern Victoria. Lime (2.5 t ha−1) substantially reduced the level of exchangeable Al and exchangeable Mn whilst raising soil pH by about 1.0 unit. The crops grown were 7 cultivars of wheat and one cultivar each of triticale, oats, barley, rapeseed, safflower, field pea, chick pea and lupins. With the exception of lupin, liming the soil increased (p=0.05) the grain yield of all crops and cultivars. With the wheat cultivars there were 2 distinct groups with different tolerance to soil acidity. Wheat, oats, triticale and lupins had higher absolute yields than the other crops. Safflower and chick pea had very low yields without soil amendment. The magnitude of the lime response did not differ between the wheat cultivars (17%) or between any of the crop species (range 9–29%). Deep ripping the soil to break a hard compacted layer resulted in more yield for all the cereals and safflower. The results demonstrate the importance of using crops with tolerance to acid soil conditions as well as gains that can be obtained with ameliorating identifiable soil problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coventry D R 1985 Changes in agricultural systems on acid soils in southern Australia.In Proc. 3rd Aust. Agron. Conf., Hobart, pp 126–145.

  • Coventry D R, Morrison G R, Reeves T G, Hirth J R and Fung K K H 1987 Mineral composition and responses to fertiliser of wheat grown on the limed and deep ripped soil in northeastern Victoria. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27, 687–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry D R, Reeves T G, Brooke H D, Ellington A and Slattery W J 1987 Increasing wheat yields in north-eastern Victoria by liming and deep ripping. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27, 679–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cregan P D 1980 Soil acidity and associated factors: Guidelines for farmer recommendations. Agbulletin 7, Department Agric., N.S.W.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellington A 1986 Effects of deep ripping, direct drilling, gypsum and lime on soils, wheat growth and yield. Soils Tillage Res. 8, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J A and Scott B J 1983 Breeding wheats for tolerance to acid soils. Proc. Aust. Plant Breeding Conf. Adelaide, pp 74–75.

  • Foy C D 1984 Physiological effects of hydrogen, aluminium and manganese toxicities in acid soils.In Soil Acidity and Liming (2nd Edition). Ed. F Adams. pp 57–97. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Armiger W H, Briggle L W and Reid D A 1965 Differential aluminium tolerances of wheat and barley varieties in acid soils. Agron. J. 57, 413–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Fleming A L and Armiger W H 1969 Differential tolerance of cotton varieties to excess manganese. Agron. J. 61, 690–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D, Fleming A L and Schwartz J W 1973 Opposite aluminium and manganese tolerance in two wheat varieties. Agron. J. 65, 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote K H 1971 A lactual key for recognition of Australian soils. Rellim Technical Publications, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenauer H M 1988 Determination of plant-available soil manganese.In Manganese in Soils and Plants. Eds. R D Graham, R J Hannam and N C Uren. pp 87–98 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Scott B J and Fisher J A 1988 Selection of genotypes tolerant to soil acidity.In Soil Acidity and Plant Growth. Ed. A D Robson, pp 167–203, Academic Press.

  • Scott B J, Burke D G and Bostrom T E 1985 Australian research on tolerance to toxic elements. Manganese. Plant and Soil 97, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott B J and Rodham L A 1987 A lime spreader for use in field research. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 53, 3 197–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steed G R, Reeves T G and Willatt S T 1987 Effects of deep ripping and liming on soil water deficits, sorptivity and penetrometer resistance. Aust. J. Exp. Res. 27, 701–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooke, H.D., Coventry, D.R., Reeves, T.G. et al. Liming and deep ripping responses for a range of field crops. Plant Soil 115, 1–6 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220687

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220687

Key words

Navigation