Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of methods for the quantification of fungal spores at the leaf surfaces ofPopulus xeuramericana

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The removal of fungal spores, urediniospores ofMelampsora medusae and conidia ofPestalozzia sp., from the leaf surfaces ofPopulus xeuramericana (Dode) Guinier cv. I-488 was assessed using three cultural techniques conventionally employed in phylloplane studies. The method of removal and the original density of spore deposition, but not the interaction of these factors, were significant determinants of variability in spore removal. Irrespective of the original density of deposition, the leaf print method was the most, and the leaf washing technique the least, efficient means of spore removal from the leaf surface. Factors which could contribute to this difference in efficiency are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Apinis A Eet al. 1972 Nova Hedwigia 23, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dickinson C H 1976In Microbiology of Aerial Plant Surfaces. Academic Press, London, 293–324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lindsay B I 1976In Microbiology of Aerial Plant Surfaces. Academic Press, London, 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Omar M and Heather W A 1975In Proceedings of the 18th Sessions of Food and Agriculture Organisation/International Poplar Working Group on Diseases, Novisad, Yugoslavia, September 28–October 4 1975.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wickremasinghe, U.K., Heather, W.A. & Griffin, D.M. Comparative study of methods for the quantification of fungal spores at the leaf surfaces ofPopulus xeuramericana . Plant Soil 85, 447–449 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220201

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220201

Key words

Navigation