Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 24–30 | Cite as

Plant diseases and their control by biological means in Cuba

  • Nina Shishkoff
Articles

Abstract

Beginning in 1989, the breakup of the Soviet Bloc disrupted trade and cut off Cuba's source of subsidized fuel oil, making many modern agricultural practices impossible, including the wide use of pesticides. Among Cuba's responses was an emphasis on biological control of plant diseases. Research into biological control began in the 1930s, and after the revolution many scientists maintained an unofficial interest. When the 1989 economic crisis occurred, the government placed a high priority on biocontrol, and researchers were in a position to begin immediate implementation. For example, the construction of factories for the mass production of biological agents had been approved in 1988, and are currently in operation. Disease monitoring was undertaken before the current crisis, with more than 90% of Cuban agriculture using it to some extent. Such monitoring has allowed a reduction in pesticide use. Since the 1989 onset of economic crisis the monitor system has not been greatly modified for use with biological control techniques, but an example of a successful transition from chemical treatment to biocontrol in Cuba is in banana plantations.

At the various research centers, research is being conducted in the biocontrol of vegetable diseases, tobacco root diseases, nematodes, and pasture weeds. Technical research is being done on mass production of inoculum, the production of application formulations, and storage of biocontrol products. Because wide use of biocontrol agents was urgently desired, the government cooperated at every step of research, including in regulatory matters. Obstacles to successful biocontrol mentioned by Cuban scientists were the lack of taxonomic knowledge and the need for strict quality control.

There are few economic studies of biocontrol agents despite the importance of such studies. Cuban scientists are in an excellent position to do such research. Forced by the economic crisis to act, Cuba has made a major change in national agronomic policy that may represent a significant and new direction for “modern” agricultural practices.

Keywords

Biological Control Plant Disease Agricultural Practice Biocontrol Agent Root Disease 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andres, L. A. and R. D. Goeden, 1971. “The biological control of weeds by introduced natural enemies.” Chapter 6 inBiological Control, Proceedings of a AAAS symposium on biological control, Boston, MA, Dec. 30–31, 1961. C. B. Huffaker, Ed. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Concepcion, N. C., R. C. Grande, J. E. Ortiz, R. M. Viera, J. F. Buides, and A. M. Muniz, (Eds.), 1984.80 anos de la Estacion Experimental Agronomica de Santiago de las Vegas. Havana: Editorial Cientifico-Tecnica.Google Scholar
  3. DeBach, P., 1974.Biological control by natural enemies. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. DeBach, P., D. Rosen, and C. E. Kenner, 1971. “Biological control of coccids by introduced natural enemies.” Chapter 7 inBiological Control, proceedings of a AAAS symposium on biological control, Boston, Massachusetts, Dec. 30–31, 1961. C. B. Huffaker, Ed. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kaufman, L., 1993. “Cabinet Fever.”Government Executive 25 (7): 32–35.Google Scholar
  6. Ministerio de la Agricultura (MA), 1991.La sigatoka amarilla en el cultivo del platano. Instituto de Investigaciones de Sanidad Vegetal, Centro de Informacion y Documentacion Agropecuario. Havana: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  7. National Academy of Science (NAS), 1993.Pesticides in the diets of infants and children. Committee on Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, Board on Agriculture, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, and the National Research Council of the National Academy of Science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, 1992a. “Biopesticides under FIFRA process challenged as too slow.”Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News 20(48):28.Google Scholar
  9. Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, 1992b. “Methyl Bromide phaseout, use reduction techniques noted.”Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News 20 (33): 31.Google Scholar
  10. Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, 1992c. “Methyl bromide production reduction urged by seven groups.”Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News 21 (3): 4.Google Scholar
  11. Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, 1992d. “Methyl bromide global control foreseen.”Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News 20 (49): 24–27.Google Scholar
  12. Reichelderfer, K. H., 1981. “Economic feasibility of biological control of crop pests.” Chapter 28 inBiological Control in Crop Production, Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research No. 5, May, 1980, G. C. Papavizas, Ed. New Jersey: Allanheld, Osmun and Co.Google Scholar
  13. Sherf, A. F. and A. A. MacNab, 1986.Vegetable diseases and their control, 2nd. Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Strub, D. (Ed). 1992.Into the sunlight: exposing methyl bromide's threat to the ozone layer. A report presented by California Action Network, Californians for Alternatives to Toxics, California Institute for Rural Studies, Friends of the Earth, National Coalition against the Misuse of Pesticides, Natural Resource Defense Council, Pesticide Action Network-North American Region. Washington, DC: Friends of the Earth Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Shishkoff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations