Advertisement

Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 15–25 | Cite as

Economic development and biotechnology: Public policy response to the farm crisis in Iowa

  • Brian J. Reichel
  • Paul Lasley
  • William F. Woodman
  • Mack C. ShelleyII
Articles

Abstract

In periods of social crisis, policymakers become particularly vulnerable to interest groups mobilizing to compete for scarce funds. At this point, legislators are no longer able to address the specific needs of their primary constituency directly, but rather are forced to do so in pretext only. New, unfamiliar technologies provide ample ammunition for astute interest groups to take advantage of times of economic turmoil and maneuver for policy support through dramatic campaigns of “salesmanship.” By publicizing a crisis situation, dramatizing it effectively, and advertising an innovation as the solution to the crisis, legislators may be effectively persuaded to give priority to interest group pressures above and beyond those of the local constituency. Iowa's attempts to address the farm crisis through economic development strategies relying on biotechnology is examined in this paper. The results of extensive surveys of Iowa's legislators and farmers are examined and the consequences for Iowa's policy process of using biotechnology under the auspices of economic development are discussed.

Keywords

Economic Development Veterinary Medicine Interest Group Development Strategy Agricultural Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, Philip H. 1978 “The federal government and innovation,”Science 201 (11 August):487.Google Scholar
  2. Abelson, Philip H. 1981 “Technology and the U. S. Economy,”Science 213 (21 August):1.Google Scholar
  3. Abelson, Philip H. 1983 “High-technology jobs,”Science 219 (21 January):1.Google Scholar
  4. Abelson, Philip H. 1986 “Evolving state-university-industry relations,”Science 231 (24 January):1.Google Scholar
  5. Aldrich, Howard E. and Jeffrey Pfeffer 1976 “Environments of organizations,”Annual Review of Sociology 2.Google Scholar
  6. Almquist, Eric 1987 “Research park joint effort,”Iowa State Daily, 15 January, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, Julie 1987a “ISU may host new $35 million molecular biology building,”Iowa State Daily, 15 January, pp. 1,9.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, Julie 1987b “Biotech research showcased at ISU,”Iowa State Daily, 18 September, p. 21.Google Scholar
  9. Benson, J. K. 1975 “The interorganizational network as a political system,”Administrative Science Quarterly 20:229–249.Google Scholar
  10. Benson, J. K. 1975 “The Interlocking network as political economy,”Administrative Science Quarterly 20 (2): 229–249.Google Scholar
  11. Benson, J. K. 1987 “Industrial Policy and Network Studies: The Case of Sweden,” Unpublished manuscript presented at the Midwest Sociological Society annual conference, Chicago, IL, March 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Blumenthal, David, Michael Gluck, Karen Seashore Louis and David Wise 1986a “Industrial support of university research in biotechnology,”Science 231 (17 January):242–246.Google Scholar
  13. Blumenthal, David, Michael Gluck, Karen Seashore Louis, Michael A. Stoto and David Wise 1986b “University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university,”Science 232 (13 June):1361–1366.Google Scholar
  14. Bultena, Gordon and Paul Lasley 1987 “The Dark Side of Agricultural Biotechnology: Farmers' Appraisals of the Benefits and Costs of Technology Innovation.” Forthcoming in the Iowa State University Bioethics Symposium Proceedings. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Buttel, Frederick H., Martin Kenney, Jack Kloppenburg, Jr. and Douglas Smith 1986 “Industry-university relationships and the Land-Grant system,”Agriculture Administrtion 23:147–181.Google Scholar
  16. Chemical and Engineering News 1982a “Universities look to industry for support,”Chemical and Engineering News 60 (12 April):16–18.Google Scholar
  17. Chemical and Engineering News 1982b “Biotechnology's ties to academia assessed,”Chemical and Engineering News 60 (26 April): 21–22.Google Scholar
  18. Cronbach, L. J. 1951 “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,”Psychometrika, 16(3) (September): 297–334.Google Scholar
  19. Daily Tribune 1987 “ISU snags top bio-tech researchers,” (Ames)Daily Tribune, 13 June, p. B7.Google Scholar
  20. Denhardt, Robert B. 1984Theories of Public Organization. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  21. Denny, Brewster C. 1982 “The high-technology fix,”Science 217 (27 August):781.Google Scholar
  22. Dickson, David 1984The New Politics of Science. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  23. Dorfman, Nancy S. 1983 “Route 128: The development of a regional high technology economy,”Research Policy 12:299–316.Google Scholar
  24. Dryzek, John S. 1983 “Don't toss coins in garbage cans: A prologue to policy designs,”Journal of Public Policy 3 (4):345–368.Google Scholar
  25. Fehr, Walter 1987 Letter to Dr. David Kline, Chairman of the Iowa State University Bioethics Committee, 16 September.Google Scholar
  26. Fogarty, Thomas A. 1987 “U of I, ISU high-tech bonds pass,”Des Moines Register, 10 May, p. 2C.Google Scholar
  27. Grad news and notes 1986 “ISU's role in Iowa economic development,”Grad News and Notes (December):1,3.Google Scholar
  28. Gurwitz, Aaron S. 1982 “The new faith in high tech,”Wall Street Journal, 27 October, p. 41.Google Scholar
  29. Hagstron, Jerry 1982 “High-tech leaders have their own ideas of what government can do for them,”National Journal (15 May):861–865.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, Richard 1987Organization: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Harman, H. H. 1976Modern Factor Analysis, Third Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hasenfeld, Yeheskel 1972 “People processing organizations: An exchange approach,”American Sociological Review 37 (3):256–263.Google Scholar
  33. Hansenfeld, Yeheskel 1983Human Service Organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Ingraham, Patricia W. 1987 “Toward more systematic consideration of policy design,”Policy Studies Journal 15 (June):611–628.Google Scholar
  35. Iowa General Assembly 1986Proceedings of the 71st Session of the Iowa General Assembly.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobs, David 1974 “Dependency and vulnerability: An exchange approach to the control of organizations,”Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (1):45–59.Google Scholar
  37. Jaschik, Scott 1986a “University-industry-government projects: Promising too much too soon?”Chronicle of Higher Education 20 (20 January):1, 12–13.Google Scholar
  38. Jaschik, Scott 1986b “Universities' high-technology pacts with industry are marred by politics, poor planning, and hype,”Chronicle of Higher Education 20 (12 March):15–17.Google Scholar
  39. Kiviniemi, Markku 1986 “Public policies and their targets: A typology of the concept of implementation,”ISSJ 108:251–265.Google Scholar
  40. Klausner, Arthur and Jennifer Van Brunt 1987 “Regional development: Striving for an edge,”Bio/Technology 5 (February):134–136.Google Scholar
  41. Knott, J. A. and Miller J. H. 1987Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional Choice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Lantor, Linda 1987 “ISU “Silicon Valley” development plan ok'd by regents,”Des Moines Register, 20 February, p. 3C.Google Scholar
  43. Lasley, Paul and Gordon Bultena 1987 “Farmers' Opinions on the Relationship Between Land Grant Colleges and Private Industry.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Madison, Wisconsin, August 1987.Google Scholar
  44. Lindblom, Charles 1980The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Linder, Stephen H. and B. Guy Peters 1987a “A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription,”Policy Studies Review 6 (February):459–475.Google Scholar
  46. Linder, Stephen H. and B. Guy Peters 1987b “From social theory to policy design,”Journal of Public Policy 4 (3):237–259.Google Scholar
  47. Lindsey, Quentin W. 1985 “Industry/university research cooperation: The state government role,”Journal of the Society of Research Administrators 16 (Fall):85–90.Google Scholar
  48. Majchrzak, Ann 1984Methods for Policy Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Marsden, Peter V. and Nan Lin (ed.) 1982Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Muhm, Don 1987 “New biotech students welcomed,”Des Moines Register, 2 May, p. 2C.Google Scholar
  51. Neff, Deb 1987 “ISU, politicians must work together to revitalize state,”Iowa State Daily, 14 January, pp. 1,3.Google Scholar
  52. Nelson, Richard 1959 “The simple economics of basic research,”Journal of Political Economy 67 (June):297–306.Google Scholar
  53. Office of Technology Assessment 1983Technology, Innovation, and Regional Economic Development. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  54. Parsons, Talcott 1956 “Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations- I and II,”Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (June):63–85; 1 (September):225–239.Google Scholar
  55. Parsons, Talcott 1960Structure and Process in Modern Society. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Perpich, Joseph G. 1983 “Genetic engineering,”Technology In Society 5:35–49.Google Scholar
  57. Poister, Theodore H. 1978Public Program Analysis: Applied Research Methods. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  58. Portney, Kent E. 1986Approaching Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction to Policy and Program Research. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Price, Steven 1988 “Biotechnology update: A message from new faculty and industry link,”Grad News and Notes (March):4.Google Scholar
  60. Reichel, Brian J., William F. Woodman and Mack C. Shelley 1987 “The New Faith in High-Technology: Biotechnology and Iowa.” Unpublished manuscript presented at the American Society for Public Administration regional conference, Minneapolis, MN, October 1987.Google Scholar
  61. Riche, Richard W., Daniel E. Hecker and John U. Burgan 1983 “High technology today and tomorrow: A small slice of the employment pie,”Monthly Labor Review 106 (November):50–58.Google Scholar
  62. Rigl, C. Ted 1986 “Study finds increasing biotech industry support for university research,”Genetic Engineering News 6 (June):3.Google Scholar
  63. Rogers, Everett 1983Diffusions of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Selznick, Philip 1949TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  65. Selznick, Philip 1957Leadership in Administration. New York, NY: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  66. Shafritz, Jay M. and J. Steven Ott 1978Classics of Organization Theory. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  67. Shelley, Mack C., William F. Woodman, Brian J. Reichel and Paul Lasley 1987 “Perceptions of the Role of University Research Biotechnology: Town, Gown, and Industry.” Forthcoming in the 1987 Iowa State University Agricultural Bioethics Symposium Proceedings. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wamsley, Garry L. and Mayer N. Zald 1973The Political Economy of Public Organizations. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  69. Warriner, Charles K. 1984Organizations and Their Environments: Essays in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press Inc.Google Scholar
  70. Wildavsky, Aaron 1984The Politics of the Bugetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  71. Wittrock, Bjorn and Peter deLeon 1986 “Policy as a moving target: A call for conceptual realism,”Policy Studies Review 6 (August):44–60.Google Scholar
  72. Woodman, William F., Brian J. Reichel and Mack C. Shelley 1987 “University-Industry Relationships in Biotechnology: Convergence and Divergence in goals and Expectations.” Forthcoming in 1987 Iowa State University Bioethics Symposium Proceedings. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian J. Reichel
  • Paul Lasley
  • William F. Woodman
  • Mack C. ShelleyII

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations