Notes
“Moore's Notion of Analysis,”The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern Universtiy Press, 1942); “A Proof That SyntheticA Priori Propositions Exist,”Journal of Philosophy, 46(1):20-24; “The Nature of Formal Analysis,” Mind, n.s., 58(230):210–14.
Journal of Philosophy, p. 24.
Ibid., p. 22.
Posterior Analytics, I 31 88a,
“Concerning Allegedly Necessary Nonanalytic Propositions,”Philosophical Studies, 2(2):18.
To express the consequent of this entailment as ‘the color of x is between Red and Yellow’ might be more accurate, but it would complicate the analysis without changing any of its important features.
Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922), pp. 273–75 passim.
“A Reply to My Critics,”The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, pp. 584–85. This point would hardly be worth mentioning, since Moore has returned to the language he used inPrincipia Ethica, except that the temptation to say that ethical properties are not intrinsic properties, which was the source of the confusion, is plainly relevant to what I wish to say about the matter.
Ibid., p. 591.
Ibid., p. 590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terrell, D.B. On a supposed synthetic entailment. Philos Stud 2, 57–63 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216995
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216995