Skip to main content
Log in

On a supposed synthetic entailment

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. “Moore's Notion of Analysis,”The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern Universtiy Press, 1942); “A Proof That SyntheticA Priori Propositions Exist,”Journal of Philosophy, 46(1):20-24; “The Nature of Formal Analysis,” Mind, n.s., 58(230):210–14.

  2. Journal of Philosophy, p. 24.

  3. Ibid., p. 22.

  4. Posterior Analytics, I 31 88a,

  5. “Concerning Allegedly Necessary Nonanalytic Propositions,”Philosophical Studies, 2(2):18.

  6. To express the consequent of this entailment as ‘the color of x is between Red and Yellow’ might be more accurate, but it would complicate the analysis without changing any of its important features.

  7. Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922), pp. 273–75 passim.

  8. “A Reply to My Critics,”The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, pp. 584–85. This point would hardly be worth mentioning, since Moore has returned to the language he used inPrincipia Ethica, except that the temptation to say that ethical properties are not intrinsic properties, which was the source of the confusion, is plainly relevant to what I wish to say about the matter.

  9. Ibid., p. 591.

  10. Ibid., p. 590.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terrell, D.B. On a supposed synthetic entailment. Philos Stud 2, 57–63 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216995

Navigation