This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Berlak, H. “Values, goals, public policy and educational evaluation.”Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 261–271.
Biber, B. “A learning-teaching paradigm integrating intellectual and affective processes.” In E. Bower and W. Hollister (Eds.),Behavioral Science Frontiers in Education. New York: Wiley, 1967. Pp. 115–155.
—Challenges Ahead for Early Childhood Education. Washington, D. C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1969.
Brickell, H. “Appraising the effects of innovation in local schools.”National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 1968,67, 284–304.
Chall, J.Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw Hill, 1967.
Cronback, L. “Course improvement throguh evaluation.”Teachers' College Record, 1963,64, 672–683.
Dewey, J.Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books, 1963.
Eisner, E.Instructional and expressive educational objectives: Their formulation and use in curriculum. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 3, 1969. Pp. 1–18.
Fiske, E. “What difference does class size make?”New York Times, September 10, 1975.
Goodlad, J. “Educational Change, Values and goals.” In R. Goulet (Ed.),Educational Change, The Reality and the Promise. New York: Citadon Press, 1968. Pp. 22–32.
Goodlad, J. Klein, F.et al. Behind the Classroom Door. Worthington, Ohio: Charles A. Jones Pub. Company, 1970.
Hirst, P. and Peters, R.The Logic of Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.
Isaacs, N.What is required of the nursery-infant teacher in this country today? London, W. I.: National Froebel Foundation, 1967.
Kilpatrick, W. “What do we mean by progressive education?”Progressive Education, 1930,7, 383–386.
Kohlberg, L. and Mayer, R. “Development as the aim of education.”Harvard Educational Review, 1972,42, 449–497.
Lindvall, C. and Cox, R.Evaluation as a tool in curriculum development: The IPI evaluation program. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 5, 1970.
Macdonald, J. “The school as a double agent.” In V. Haubrich (Ed.),Freedom, Bureaucracy, and Schooling. Association for Supervision and Development, NEA, 1971. Pp. 235–246.
Molony, C. “Phenomenological descriptive inquiry as a method of documenting open corridor.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1974.
Neill, A. S.Summerhill. New York: Hart, 1960.
Skinner, B. “The science of learning and the art of living.”Harvard Educational Review, 1854,25, 86–97,
—Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1971.
Spodek, B. “What are the sources of early childhood curriculum?”Young Children, 1970,26(1), 48–58.
Stake, R.Toward a technology for the evaluation of educational programs. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1, 1967.
Weber, L. “Toward the finer specificity.” InEvaluation Reconsidered. New York: Workshop Center for Open Education, 1973, Pp. 3–7.
Westbury, I. “Curriculum evaluation.”Review of Educational Research. 1970,40, 239–260.
Additional information
Catherine Molony is a former advisor to the New York City Open Corridor program and research field coordinator for Educational Testing Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molony, C. Holding the evaluators accountable. Urban Rev 9, 50–58 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216024
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216024