Skip to main content
Log in

Keep talking—Performance effectiveness with continuous voice recognition for spreadsheet users

  • Published:
International Journal of Speech Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of spreadsheet users was compared for two modes of input to the computer—keyboard and continuous voice recognition (CVR)—for subjects classified by their decision style. In addition, the data for this experiment was compared to results of a similar experiment that used a discrete word recognition system. Dependent measures were task completion time, accuracy, keystroke count, correction count, and user confidence for spreadsheet tasks. Results, using a speaker-dependent continuous voice recognizer, showed that for both simple data input and more complex analytical problems, subjects did not perform more effectively using CVR compared to keyboard. In addition, a subject's decision style was found not to interact with CVR for an effect on performance. Compared to earlier discrete word recognition results, CVR tended to shorten the time to complete a spreadsheet analysis task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlyn, M. (1977). An assessment of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(5):461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaemer, M. and Wallace, W. (1992). The effects on decision task performance of computer synthetic voice output.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36:65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaemer, M. and Wright, G. (1991). Lotus, can we talk? User Effectiveness with Voice Input for Spreadsheet Tasks.Proceedings AVIOS '91 Voice I/O Applications Conference. pp. 60–63. Atlanta: American Voice I/O Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaemer, M., Wright, G. and Dillon, T. (1992). Performance Effectiveness with Voice Input for Beginning Spreadsheet Users.Proceedings AVIOS '92 Voice I/O Systems Applications Conference, pp. 180–185. Minneapolis: American Voice I/O Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaemer, M., Wright, G. and Dillon, T. (1994). Automated Speech Recognition for Spreadsheet Tasks: Performance Effects for Experts and Novices. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3):299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. (1962). Introduction to Type. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. and Taggart, W. (1981). Measuring Managers' Minds: The Assessment of Style in Human Information Processing. Academy of Management Review, 6(3):375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnicky, A. (1990) The Design of Spoken Language Interfaces (No. CMU-CS-90-118). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. School of Computer Science.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeHaemer, M.J., Wright, G., Richards, M.H. et al. Keep talking—Performance effectiveness with continuous voice recognition for spreadsheet users. Int J Speech Technol 2, 41–48 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215803

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215803

Keywords

Navigation