Skip to main content
Log in

Cotton root and shoot responses to subsurface drip irrigation and partial wetting of the upper soil profile

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of cotton roots to grow downwards through a partially-wetted soil (Calcic Haploxeralf) profile toward a water source located beneath them was investigated. Plants were grown in 60-cm-high soil columms (diameter 10 cm), the bottom 15 cm of which was kept wet by frequent drip irrigation, while the upper 45 cm was wetted three times per week up to 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100% of pot capacity. Pot capacity was defined as the water content which gave uniform distribution within the pot and was at a soil matric potential (ψ m ) of −0.01 MPa. Plants were harvested 42 and 70 days after emergence (DAE). Root length density was reduced by decreased soil moisture content. At 42 DAE, density was reduced in the soil profile down to 36 cm. The density in the middle segment of the cylinder (24–36 cm) increased at the second harvest, from 0.1 to 0.35 cm · cm−3 at 40% and from 0.2 to 0.5 cm · cm−1 at 60% of pot capacity, respectively. A significant rise in root length density was found at all moisture contents above 20% in the two deepest soil segments. It was most marked at 40% where the rise was from 0.2 to 0.8 cm · cm−3, due to the development of secondary roots at the wetted bottom of the column. When only 20% of pot capacity was maintained in the top 45 cm of the profile, almost no roots reached the wetted soil volume, and root length density was very low. Hydrotropism, namely root growth through dry soil layers toward a wet soil layer was thus not apparent. Root dry weight per unit length decreased with increasing depth in the column at all moisture levels. However, the only significant decrease was, found between the top and the second soil segments and was due to thicker primary roots in the top segment. There was no clear relationship between length and dry weight of roots. Total plant dry weight and transpiration were reduced significantly only at 20% of pot capacity. Dry matter production by roots was less severely inhibited than that by shoots, under decreased moisture content in the soil profile. Leaf water potential decreased when the soil moisture content of the top 45 cm of the profile was reduced below 60% of pot capacity. It was concluded that even at soil moisture content equivalent to aΨ m of 0.1 MPa, the rate of root growth was sufficient to reach a wetted soil layer at the bottom of the soil column, where the plant roots then proliferated. This implies that as long as the soil above the subsurface dripper is not very dry there is no real need for early surface irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barley KP, Farrel DA, Grecan EL (1965) The influence of soil strength on the penetration of a loam by plant roots. Aust J Soil Res 3:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DM, Stockton JR, Dickens WL (1970) Root growth of cotton as measured by p32 uptake. Agron J 62:200–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg JE, Turner NC (1970) Water potential gradients in field tobacco. Plant Physiol 46:343–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland WL, Dugas WA (1988) Root length density from minirhizotron observations. Agron J 80:271–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi A, Plaut Z, Sinai M (1993) Cotton root growth as affected by changes in soil water distribution and their impact on plant tolerance to drought. Irig Sci 13: 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove D (1986) Biophysical control of plant cell growth. Ann Rev PI Physiol 37:377–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirksen C (1978) Transient and steady flow from subsurface line sources at constant hydraulic head in anisotropic soil. Trans ASAE 21:913–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Eavis BW, Taylor HM (1979) Transpiration of soybeans as related to leaf area, root length and soil water content. Agron J 71: 441–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH (1991) Characteristics and function of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker Inc New York, pp 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PJ (1976) Root systems in plant communities. In: Gregory PJ, Lake JV Rose DA (eds) Root development and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer B, Plant Z (1989) Photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment of two sugarbeet cultivars grown under saline conditions. J Exp Bot 40:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B (1987) Origin, branching and distribution of root systems. In: Gregory PJ, Lake JV, Rose DA (eds) Root development and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 103–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B, Taylor HM, Huck MG, Fiscus EL (1973) Water relations and growth of cotton in drying soil. Agron 165:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizek DT, Carmi A, Mirecke RM, Snyder FW, Bunce JA (1985) Comparative effects of soil moisture stress and restricted root zone volume on morphogenetic and physiological response of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr). J Exp Bot 36:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis WE, Ewan LM (1936) Hydrotropic responses of roots in soil. Bet Gaz 97:728–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhuish FM, Lang ARG (1968) Quantitative studies of roots in soil. I. Length and diameter of cotton roots in a clay loam soil by analysis of surface-ground block of resin-impregnated soil. Soil Sci 106: 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien L (1979) Genetic variability of root growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Aust Jour Agr Res 30:587–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut Z, Rom R, Meiri A (1985) Cotton response to subsurface trickle irrigation. Proceedings of the Third International Drip/Trickle Irrigation Congress. ASAE St Joseph, MI

  • Portas CAM, Taylor HM (1976) Growth and survival of young plant roots in dry soil. Soil Sci 121: 170–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz HR, Matthews MA (1989) Environmental control of resistance to water flow in shoots ofVitus vinifera L. In: Kreeb KH, Richter H, Hinckley TM (eds) Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses: water shortage. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinai M (1988) Development and activity of cotton root system growing in a limited soil volume. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (In Hebrew with English abstract), 70 pp

  • Taylor HM, Gardner HR (1963) Penetration of cotton seedling tap roots as influenced by bulk density, moisture content and strength of soil. Soil Sci 96: 153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HM, Ratliff LR (1969) Root elongation rates of cotton and peanuts as a function of soil strength and soil water content. Soil Sci 108:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas AW, Duke HR, Kruse EG (1977) Capillary potential distribution in root zone using subsurface irrigation. Trans ASAE 20:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick AW, Lomen DO, Amoozegur-Fard A (1980) Linearized moisture flow with root extraction for three-dimensional steady conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:911–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler H (1956) Hydrotropismus. In: Ruhland W, Ashby E, Bonner J, Geiger-Huber M, James WO, Lang A, Muller D, Staffelt MG (eds) Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie Band III, pp 432–450

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaut, Z., Carmi, A. & Grava, A. Cotton root and shoot responses to subsurface drip irrigation and partial wetting of the upper soil profile. Irrig Sci 16, 107–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215618

Keywords

Navigation