Skip to main content
Log in

Toward analysis of the relations among the youth counterculture, telephone hotlines, and anonymity

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1960s, there emerged a youth culture which had two major orientations: the Counterculture and the Movement. We are well informed about this youth culture, its social values, social norms, and emergent social roles (e.g., “hippie”, “freak”, “radical”, “dropout”). Part of these social and political movements was the creation of “alternative”, “counterculture”, or “radical” human service programs. Early examples were free medical clinics, drop-in centers, and telephone hotlines. Among the actual differences in these programs compared to older, “established” human service agencies was (is) the prominent position of the social value of client anonymity. This notion of client anonymity is examined in the attempt to understand its role in the relations among themes of the Counterculture, individual youth, their peers, and youth-serving agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, S. H. (1971). The sociology of the telephone.Internat. J. Comp. Sociol. 12: 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baizerman, M., and Ellison, D. L. (1971). A social role analysis of senility.Gerontologist 11(2): 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. W. (1968). Toward a sociology of telephones, in Truzzi, M. (ed.),Sociology and Everyday Life, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., pp. 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., Berger, B., and Kellner, H. (1973). Demodernizing consciousness.Social Policy 3(6): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black's Law Dictionary, 4th ed. (1957). West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minn.

  • Brockopp, G. W. (1970). The telephone call—Conversation or therapy and crisis intervention.Crisis Intervention 2(3): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R. E. (ed.) (1971).Risk-Taking Behavior, Thomas, Springfield, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwast, J. (1964). The social function of guilt.Social Work 9(2): 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., and Jaffe, D. T. (1973).Toward a Radical Therapy: Alternative Services for Personal and Social Change, Gordon and Breach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisis Intervention (all issues). Suicide Prevention and Crisis Service, Buffalo, N.Y.

  • Cumming, E. (1968).Systems of Social Regulation, Atherton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1971).Politics as Symbolic Action, Markham, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson E. (1971). Youth and the Life cycle. In Muuss, R. E. (ed.),Adolescent Behavior and Society, Random House, New York, pp. 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. (1969). The organization-set. In Thompson, J. D., and Broom, V. H. (eds.),Organizational Design and Research, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flacks, R. (1971).Youth and Social Change, Markham, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday Anchor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y. (1972). People-processing organizations: An exchange approach,Am. Sociol. Rev. 37(3): 256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedin, D. (1972). Hotline operators look at hotlines.Center Quarterly Focus 1(3). Center for Youth Development and Research, University of Minnesota.

  • Hofstadter, R. (1965).The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotlines for Youth (1972). U.S. DHEW, Youth Development and Delinquency Prevention Program, Publication No. DHEW-SRS 72-26006.

  • Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public placesTransaction 7(3): 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Dahlke, A. E., and La Charite, N. (1973).Helping Behavior in a Hotline Setting (mimeo, first draft), American Institutes for Research, Kensington, Md., p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard, S. M. (1971).Self-Disclosure, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. (1971). A counter-culture explanation of student activism.Soc. Problems 19(2): 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N., and Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risk taking as a function of the situation, the person and the group. InNew Directions in Psychology III, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 111–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konopka, G. (1973). Requirements for healthy development of adolescent youth.Adolescence 8(31): 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefton, M., and Rosengren, W. (eds.) (1970).Organizations and Clients, Merrill, Columbus, O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Life, June 23, 1972, pp. 31–39.

  • MacLeod, G. (1967). Confession and absolution. In Mowrer, O. H. (ed.),Morality and Mental Health, Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957).Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. E., and Tumin, M. M. (1949). Some social functions of ignorance.Am. Sociol. Rev. 14(6): 787–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natanson, M. (1970).The Journeying Self, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Directory of Hotlines, Switchboards and Related Services, (1972). The Exchange, 311 Cedar Ave. S., Minneapolis, Minn.

  • O'Rourke, D. (1973). Models for the confession.Priest 29(2): 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (1928). Clarendon, Oxford.

  • Phillips, D. L. (1969). Rejection: A possible consequence of seeking help for mental disorders. In Rusing, W. A. (ed.),Deviant Behavior and Social Process, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 394–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962).Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak, T. (1969).The Making of a Counter Culture, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972). The search for help: No one to turn to. In Shneidman, E. S. (ed.),Essays in Self-Destruction, Science House, New York, pp. 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. (1968). Negotiating reality: Notes on power in the assessment of responsibility.Soc. Problems 16(1): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings.Am. Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The stranger. In Wolff, K. H. (ed.),The Sociology of Georg Simmel, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., pp. 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E., Bental, D. J., and Schwartz, J. L. (eds.) (1971).The Free Clinic: A Community Approach to Health Care and Drug Abuse, Stash Press, Beloit, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, M., Quay, H. C., Mark, H., and Nealey, V. (1969). Disease ideology and mental health research.Soc. Problems 16(3): 349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transaction/Society (special issue 1972). New life styles for Americans. 9(4).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Holds degrees in social work and public health and is currently completing a report of a national survey of hotlines and youth crisis programs and working with others in editing papers for a monograph from a conference on evaluating hotlines. The survey data will appear in that publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baizerman, M. Toward analysis of the relations among the youth counterculture, telephone hotlines, and anonymity. J Youth Adolescence 3, 293–306 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214743

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214743

Keywords

Navigation