Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review and critique of the process approach in neuropsychological assessment

  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper surveys the process approach literature with an emphasis on higher level cognitive functions like attention and concentration, learning and memory, and problem solving and executive functioning. In particular, it discusses organizational strategies and kinds of errors found on a variety of tests as well as behavioral, situational, and interpersonal issues as they relate to test procedures. It critiques the process approach and suggests future directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, M. B. (1986). Relationships between test scores and everyday functioning. In Uzzell, B., & Gross, Y. (eds.),Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention, Boston, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, M.B. (1990). A review of the ecological validity of neuropsychological tests. In Tupper, D. E. & Cicerone, K. D. (eds.),The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life, Boston, Kluwer, pp. 19–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., Labouvie-Vief, G., Hobart, C. J., and Dorosz, M. (1990). Adult age differences in story recall style.Journal of Gerontology 45: 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, H., and Levy, L. (1940).Test and Manual of Instructions: The Revised Examination for the Measurement of Efficiency of Mental Functioning, Stoelting, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering, Cambridge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Mandleberg, I., Gordon, W., and Gerstman, L. J. (1971). Similarities and differences in block design performance between older normal and brain-injured persons: A task analysis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78: 17–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M. (1982). Constructional strategies on complex figure drawings after unilateral brain damage.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4: 51–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (1990).Information in the Brain: A Molecular Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, J. (1991). The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms.Clinical Neuropsychologist 5: 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelune, G. J. and Moehle, K. A. (1986). Neuropsychological assessment and everyday functioning. In Wedding, D., Horton, A. M., Jr., and Webster, J. (eds.),The Neuropsychology Handbook, Springer, New York, pp. 489–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., and Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.),Human Abilities: An Information Processing Approach, W. H. Freeman, New York, pp. 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A.-L. (1975).Luria's Neuropsychological Investigation, Spectrum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E. and Ober, B. A. (1987).California Verbal Learning Test: Manual, Psychological Corporation, San Anatonio TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. C., McKee, R., Massman, P. J., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., and Gettman, D. (1991). Alternate form of the California Verbal Learning Test: Development and reliability.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 5: 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denman, S. B. (1984).Denman Neuropsychology Memory Scale. Sidney B. Denman, Charleston SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. W., and Young, A. W. (1988).Human Cognitive Neuropsychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (1974).The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flashman, L. A., Horner, M. D. and Freides, D. (1991). Note on scoring perseveration on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.Clinical Neuropsychologist, 5: 190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E. (1986). Varieties of perseveration: A comparison of two taxonomies.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 8: 710–726.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E., and Tucker, D. (1979). Motor perseveration and long-term memory for visual forms.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1: 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Hammeke, T. A. and Purish, A. D. (1980).Manual for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. (1939).The organism, Beacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. and Scheerer, M. (1941). Abstract and concrete behavior: An experimental study with special tests.Psychological Monographs 53 (Whole No. 239): 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, D. R. (1956). A proverbs test for clinical and experimental use.Psychological Reports 1: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. F. (1993). Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: Is it time yet?American Journal of Psychiatry, 150: 178–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977). Paced auditory serial-addition task: A measure of recovery from concussion.Perceptual and Motor Skills 44: 367–373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T., and Hayden, M. E. (1986). The ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment and remediation. In Uzzell, B. P., and Gross, Y. (eds.),Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention, Martinus Nijhoff, New York, pp. 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haut, M. W., Petros, T. V., and Frank, R. G. (1990). The recall of prose as a function of importance following closed head injury.Brain Injury 4: 281–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K. (1981).Wisconsin Card Sort Test Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa FL. Heaton, R. K., and Pendleton, M.G. (1981).

  • Use of neuropsychological tests to predict adult patients' everyday functioning.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 49: 807–821.

  • Hodges, J. R. (1994).Cognitive Assessment for Clinicians. Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (ed.) (1968).Diagnostic Psychological Testing (rev. ed.), International Universities, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, J. (1959). A paired associate learning test for use with elderly psychiatric patients.Journal of Mental Science. 105: 440–443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L. (1991). Standardized and flexible batteries in neuropsychology: An assessment update.Neuropsychological Review 2: 281–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neurological assessment. In Dennis, M., Kaplan, E., Posner, M. I., Stein, D. G., and Thompson, R. F. (eds.),Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement and Practice, American Psychological Association Washington DC., pp. 129–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris, R., and Delis, D. C. (1991).WAIS-R NI, Psychological Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, R. J., Bower, G. H., and Schorr, D. (1984). Stimulus variables in the block design task revisited: A reply to Royer.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 705–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review 85: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopfstein, J. H., and Neale, J. M. (1972). A multivariate study of attention dysfunction in schizophrenia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 80: 294–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, W. S., Seidman, L. J., Farone, S. V., et al. (1992). Attention/information processing factors in psychotic disorders.Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 180: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRue, A., D'Elia, L. F., Clark, E. O., Spar, J. E. and Jarvik, L. F. (1986). Clinical tests of memory in dementia, depression, and healthy aging.Journal of Psychology and Aging 1: 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions.International Journal of Psychology 17: 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1983).Neuropsychological Assessment (rev. ed.), Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring, D. W., Lee, G. P. and Meador, K. J. (1988). Revising the Rey-Osterreith: Rating right hemisphere recall:Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 3: 239–247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loring, D. W., Martin, R. C., Meador, K. J., and Lee, G. P. (1990). Psychometric construction of the Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure: Methodological considerations and interrater reliability.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 5: 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loring, D. W., and Papanicolaou, A. C. (1987). Memory assessment in neuropsychology: Theoretical considerations and practical utility.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 9: 340–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1966).Higher Cortical Functions in Man, Basic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1973).The Working Brain, Basic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M. and Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed.Cognitive Psychology 9: 111–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, R. A., and Warrington, E. K. (1990).Cognitive Neuropsychology: A Clinical Introduction, Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowd, J., and Botwinick, J. (1984). Rote and gist memory in relation to type of information, sensory mode, and age.Journal of Genetic Psychology 145: 167–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, M., Benton, A., and Diller, L. (Eds.) (1987).Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F. (1975).The Organization of Prose and Its Effect on Memory, American Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirsky, A. F., Anthony, B. J., Duncan, C. C.,et al. (1991). Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach.Neuropsychology Review 2: 109–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. F. and Wheelock, J. (1992). Digit Symbol and Symbol Digits Modalities Tests: Are they directly interchangeable?Neuropsychology 6: 337–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzak, M. H., and Kornetsky, C. (1966). Attention dysfunction in chronic schizophrenia.Archives of General Psychiatry 14: 323–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, A., and Zangwill, O. L. (1944). Disorders of visual space perception associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere.Brain 67: 331–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, M. G., and Heaton, R. K. (1982). A comparison of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Category Test.Journal of Clinical Psychology 38: 392–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrine, K. (1993). Differential aspects of conceptual processing in the Category Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 15: 461–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power, D. G., Logue, P. E., McCarty, S. M., Rosenstiel, A. K., and Zeisat, H. A. (1979). Inter-rater reliability of the Russell revision of the Wechsler Memory Scale: An attempt to clarify some ambiguities in scoring.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1: 343–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., and Davison, L. A. (1974).Clinical Neuropsychology: Current Status and Applications, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. (1982). Central processing deficiencies in children: Toward a developmental neuropsychological model.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 4: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, F. L. (1977). Information processing in the block design task.Intelligence 1: 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, F. L. (1978). Intelligence and the processing of stimulus structure.Intelligence 2: 11–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, F. L. (1984). Stimulus variables in the block design task: A commentary on Schorr, Bower and Kiernan.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 700–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, F. L. and Weitzel, K. E. (1977). Effect of perceptual cohesiveness on pattern recoding in the block design task.Perception and Psychophysics 21: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandson, J. and Albert, M. L. (1984). Varieties of perseveration.Neuropsychologia 22: 715–732.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1990).Tell me a story. Scribner's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, D., Bower, G. H., and Kiernan, R. (1982). Stimulus variables in the block design task.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50: 479–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shorr, J. S., Delis, D. C., and Massman, P. (1992). Memory for the Rey-Osterreith figure: Clustering, encoding and storage.Neuropsychology 6: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum, H. K. D., McFarland, K. A., and Bain, J. D. (1990). Construct validity of eight tests of attention: Comparison of normal and closed head injury samples.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 4: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlberg, M. M. and Mateer, C. A. (1989).Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice, Guilford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O. and Strauss, E. (1991).A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. A., Singer, E. A., Duke, L. M., Singer, N. G., Morey, C. E., Daughtrey, E. W., and Kaplan, E. (1994). The Boston qualitative scoring system for the Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure: Description and interrater reliability.Clinical Neuropsychologist 8: 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985).Beyond IQ, Cambridge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, H., Lewin, I., and Kohn-Dorshav, N. (1986). The Goldstein-Scheerer Cube Test: A developmental-regressive study.Journal of Clinical Psychology 42: 799–809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuve, P., Erickson, R. C., and Spaulding, W. (1991). Cognitive rehabilitation: The next step in psychiatric rehabilitation.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 15: 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talland, G. A. (1965).Deranged Memory, Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse.Cognitive Psychology 9: 77–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupper, D. E., and Cicerone, K. D. (eds.). (1990).The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, B. P., and Gross, Y. (1986).Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zomeran, A. H., and Brouwer, W. H. (1987). Head injury and concepts of attention. In H. S. Levin, J. Grafman, and H. M. Eisenberg (eds.),Neurobehavioral Recovery from Head Injury, Oxford, New York, pp. 398–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, R. S. H. (1973).Manual of the Complex Figure Test CFT, Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waber, D. P., and Holmes, J. M. (1985). Assessing children's copy productions of the Rey-Osterreith complex figure.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 7: 264–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1985).Understanding Brain Damage, Churchill Livingston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1987).Neuropsychology: A Clinical Approach (2nd ed.), Churchill Livingston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, H. S., and Lomenick, T. (1983). Levels of organization in descriptive passages: Production, comprehension and recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 35: 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1944).The Measurement of Adult Intelligence (3rd ed.), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981).Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised Manual, Psychological Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1987).Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised, Psychological Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement: A basic problem of education and developmental psychology.Harvard Educational Review 7: 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachary, R. A. (1986).Shipley Institute of Living Scale: Revised Manual, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinski, E. M., Gilewski, M. J., and Light, L. L. (1984). Adult age differences in memory for prose: The question of sensitivity to passage structure.Developmental Psychology 20: 1181–1192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seattle VA Medical Center and University of Washington Medical School, 98108, Seattle, Washington

    Richard C. Erickson

Authors
  1. Richard C. Erickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erickson, R.C. A review and critique of the process approach in neuropsychological assessment. Neuropsychol Rev 5, 223–243 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214647

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214647

Key Words

Search

Navigation