Plant and Soil

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 167–175 | Cite as

Nitrogen losses from field-grown spring barley plants as affected by rate of nitrogen application

  • J. K. Schjørring
  • N. E. Nielsen
  • H. E. Jensen
  • A. Gottschau
Article

Abstract

The content of soil derived (unlabelled) and fertilizer derived (15N-labelled) nitrogen in the aerial parts of spring sown barley was followed during three growing seasons with widely different climatic conditions. The nitrogen fertilizer was NH4NO3. It was applied annually at four levels (30, 90, 120 and 150 kg N ha−1).

The content of fertilizer derived N in the aerial parts of the barley plants was found to attain maximum level about the time of ear emergence. Thereafter it declined. The decline varied from about 5 to 40kg N ha−1. As much as 45% of the fertilizer derived N taken up earlier in the growing period was thereby lost.

The content of soil derived N in the aerial parts of the barley plants was independent of the amount of applied N fertilizer and it increased steadily during the whole growing period. Any loss of soil derived N from the tops was therefore more than compensated for by continuous uptake of soil derived N through the roots.

The greatest losses of fertilizer derived N took place from plants with a nitrogen harvest index (ratio between grain N content and total shoot N content) below 0.63 at maturity. In contrast, only little nitrogen was lost from plants with a nitrogen harvest index above 0.68 at maturity. The periods of rapid N losses did not coincide with the variation of the rainfall.

The cause of the nitrogen loss is discussed and it is suggested that a substantial part of the loss was due to volatilization of ammonia from the aerial parts of the plants.

Key words

ammonia barley gaseous nitrogen Hordeum vulgare L. nitrogen balance nitrogen harvest index nitrogen-15 tracer soil nitrogen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin R B, Ford M A, Edrich J A and Blackwell R D 1977 The nitrogen economy of winter wheat. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 88, 159–167.Google Scholar
  2. Cochran W G and Cox G M 1957 Experimental Designs. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 305 p.Google Scholar
  3. Ellen J 1987 Effects of plant density and nitrogen fertilization in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). 1. Production pattern and grain yield. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 35, 137–153.Google Scholar
  4. Farquhar G D, Firth P M, Wetselaar R and Weir B 1980 On the gaseous exchange of ammonia between leaves and the environment: Determination of the ammonia compensation point. Plant Physiol. 66, 710–714.Google Scholar
  5. Farquhar G D, Wetselaar R and Weir B 1983 Gaseous nitrogen losses from plants.In Gaseous Loss of Nitrogen from Plant-Soil Systems. Eds. J R Freney and J R Simpson, pp 159–180. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Feller U and Keist M 1986 Senescence and nitrogen metabolism in annual plants.In Fundamental, Ecological and Agricultural Aspects of Nitrogen Metabolism in Higher Plants. Eds. H Lambers, J J Neeteson and I Stulen, pp 219–234. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Fiedler R and Proksch G 1975 The determination of15N by emission and mass spectrometry in biochemical analysis: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 78, 1–62.Google Scholar
  8. French R J and Schultz J E 1984 Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. II. Some limitations to efficiency. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 35, 765–775.Google Scholar
  9. Glass A D M 1988 Nitrogen uptake by plant roots. ISI Atlas of Science: Plants and Animals, Vol. 1, pp 151–156.Google Scholar
  10. Greenwood D J, Verstraeten L M J and Draycott A 1987 Response of winter wheat to N-fertilizer: Quantative relations for components of growth. Fert. Res. 12, 119–137.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory P J, Marshall B and Biscoe P V 1981 Nutrient relations of winter wheat. 3. Nitrogen, photosynthesis of flag leaves and translocation of nitrogen to grain. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 96, 539–547.Google Scholar
  12. Harper L A, Sharpe R R, Landgale G W and Giddens J E 1987 Nitrogen cycling in a wheat crop: Soil, plant and aerial nitrogen transport. Agron. J. 79, 965–973.Google Scholar
  13. Hinds A A and Lowe L E 1980 Application of the Berthelot reaction to the determination of ammonium-N in soil digests. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 11, 465–475.Google Scholar
  14. Hooker M L, Sander D H, Peterson G A and Daigger L A 1980 Gaseous N losses from winter wheat. Agron. J. 72, 789–792.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkyn J F and Finney M E 1984 Experiments to examine the significance of ammonia evolution from barley seedlings infected with the powdery mildew fungusErysiphe graminis f. sp. hordef. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 102, 697–685.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen E S 1987 Seasonal patterns of growth and nitrogen fixation in field-grown pea. Plant and Soil 101, 29–37.Google Scholar
  17. Johansen H S and Middelboe V 1982 Simplified procedure for optical emission analysis of15N and13C. Appl. Spectroscopy 3, 221–223.Google Scholar
  18. Lemon E and Van Houtte R 1980 Ammonia exchange at the land surface. Agron. J. 72, 876–883.Google Scholar
  19. Mary B, Recous S and Machet J M 1987 A comprehensive approach to the fertilizer part of plant nitrogen uptake.In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils. Eds. D S Jenkinson and K A Smith. pp 85–94. Elsevier Applied Science, London.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan J A 1988 Growth and canopy carbon dioxide exchange rate of spring wheat as affected by nitrogen status. Crop Sci. 28, 95–100.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan J A and Parton W J 1988 Characteristics of NH3 volatilization from spring wheat. Crop Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
  22. O'Deen W A and Porter L K 1986 Continuous flow system for collecting volatile amines from senescing wheat. Agron. J. 78, 746–749.Google Scholar
  23. Parton W J, Morgan J A, Altenhofen J M and Harper L A 1988 Ammonia volatilization from spring wheat plants. Agron. J. 80, 419–425.Google Scholar
  24. Power J F, Grumes D L, Reichman G A and Willis W D 1970 Effect of soil temperature on rate of barley development and nutrition. Agron. J. 62, 567–570.Google Scholar
  25. Recous S, Machet J M and Mary B 1988 The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop. II. Plant uptake and N efficiency. Plant and Soil 112, 215–224.Google Scholar
  26. Rumburg C B and Sneva F A 1970 Accumulation and loss of nitrogen during growth of cereal rye (Secale cereale). Agron. J. 62, 311–313.Google Scholar
  27. Schjørring J K Gottschau A, Noerlund T, Nielsen N E and Jensen H E 1988 The dynamics of nitrogen in the root zone of field grown spring barley as affected by nitrogen application irrigation and undersown catch crops. Research Rpt. 1208, 166 pp. Dept. of Soil and Water and Plant Nutrition, Royal Vet. and Agric. Univ., Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  28. Schjørring J K and Saxe H 1989 Ammonia emission, net photosynthesis, dark respiration and transpiration by barley plants as affected by N status. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  29. Tukey H B 1970 The leaching of substrates from plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 21, 305–324.Google Scholar
  30. Weiland R T and Stutte C A 1979 Pyro-chemiluminescent differentiation of oxidized and reduced N forms evolved from plant foliage. Crop Sci. 19, 545–547.Google Scholar
  31. Wetselaar R and Farquhar G D 1980 Nitrogen losses from tops of plants. Adv. Agron. 33, 263–302.Google Scholar
  32. Wilfarth H, Römer H and Wimmer G 1906 Über die Nährstoffaufnahme der Pflanzen in verschiedenen Zeiten ihres Wachstums. Landw. Vers.-Stat. 63, 1–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. Schjørring
    • 1
  • N. E. Nielsen
    • 1
  • H. E. Jensen
    • 1
  • A. Gottschau
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Soil and Water and Plant NutritionThe Royal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityFrederiksberg C, CopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsThe Royal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityFrederiksberg C, CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations