Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical comparison between the ICF and the ICF-spherical pinch

  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spherical pinch concept is an outgrowth of the inertial confinement model. The salient feature of the spherical pinch concept is the creation of a hot plasma in the center of a sphere.(1,2) This plasma is then compressed by a strong shock wave launched from the periphery of the vessel by an imploded plasma acting as a driver. This scheme, reveals that convergence of the shock, which is the main feature of all inertial confinement schemes, is a component of the spherical pinch model. The reasons for classifying the spherical pinch as a particular ICF model and designating it as a ICF-SP are given here. The fluid mechanics and high-temperature hydrodynamics of the spherical pinch can be briefly described as an explosion within an implosion. The structure of the shock wave for such explosion within an implosion and for, an implosion alone is determined by solving numerically the governing equations of the phenomena. We present here a detailed computational comparison of the inertial confinement model and the spherical pinch in terms of density, pressure, temperature, confinement time, total accumulated number of neutrons, and time-resolved neutron flux from reactions in deuterium-tritium mixture. It is shown that temperature, confinement time, and total number of neutrons for the ICF-Spherical Pinch improve upon the classical ICF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Panarella (1980). Quasi-spherical compression of a spark-channel plasma.Can. J. Phys. 58, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —Idem (1987). Spherical pinch.J. Fusion Energy 6, 285.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. G. Cordey, R. J. Goldston, and R. R. Parker (1992). Progress toward a tokamak fusion reactor.Phys. Today January.

  4. J. D. Lindl, R. L. McCrory, and E. M. Campbell (1992). Progress toward ignition and burn propagation in inerttial confinement fusion.Phys. Today September.

  5. W. J. Hogan, R. Bangerter, and G. L. Kulcinski (1992). Energy from inertial fusion.Phys. Today September.

  6. B. Ahlborn and M. H. Hey (1981). Scaling laws for laser driven exploding pusher targets.Plasma Phys. 23, 435.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Velarde, Y. Ronen, and J. M. Martinez-Val (1992).Nuclear Fusion by Inertial Confinement: A Comprehensive Treatise (CRC Press). p. 46.

  8. H. Motz (1979).The Physics of Laser Fusion (Academic Press).

  9. E. Panarella and P. Savic (1983). Scaling laws for spherical pinch experiments.J. Fusion Energy 3, 199.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. B. Chen, J. Chen, B. Hilko, and E. Panarella (1993). Possible Instability Mechanism for the ICF-Spherical Pinch, 23rd Annual Anomalous Absorption Conference, Wintergreen, Virginia.

  11. S. Glasstone and R. H. Lovberg (1960).Controlled Thermonuclear Reaction: An Introduuction to Theory and Experiment (D. Van Nostrand Company).

  12. J. J. Duderstadt and G. A. Moses (1982).Inertial Confinement Fusion (John Wiley & Sons).

  13. K. A. Brueckner and S. Jorna (1974). Laser-driven fusion.Rev. Modern Phys. 46, 325–367.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Spitzer, Jr. (1962).Physics of Fully Ionized Gases, 2nd Ed. (Interscience Publishers).

  15. Ya. B. Zel'dovich, G. I. Barenblatt, V. B. Librovich, and G. M. Makhviladze (1985).The Mathematical Theory of Combustion and Explosions (Consultants Bureau), p. 550.

  16. A. K. Oppenheim (1973). Experiments in gasdynamics of explosions.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 5.

  17. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz (1966).Fluid Mechanics (Academic Press), p. 392 (Pergamon Press, 1959).

  18. Ya. B. Zel'dovich and Yu. P. Raizer (1966).Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic Press), p. 794.

  19. J. H. Gardner, D. L. Book, and I. B. Bernstein (1982). Stability of imploding shocks in the CCW approximation.J. Fluid Mech. 114, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Richard De Vore and E. S. Oran (1992). The stability of imploding detonations in the geometrical shock dynamics (CCW) model.Phys. Fluids A 4, 835.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Takayama, H. Kleine, and H. Grönig (1987). An experimental investigation of the stability of converging cylindrical shock waves in air.Exp. Fluids 5, 315.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. G. Gamaly (1992). Hydrodynamic instability of target implosion in ICF, inNuclear Fusion by Inertial Confinement: A Comprehensive Treatise, G. Velarde, Y. Ronen, and J. M. Martínez-Val, eds. (CRC Press), p. 321.

  23. S. Chandrasekhar (1961).Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  24. David L. Book (1986). Rayleigh-Taylor instability in compressible media, inEncyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, N. P. Cheremisinoff, ed. (Gulf Publishing Company).

  25. H. B. Chen. Instability in ICF and ICF-SP, Advanced Laser and Fusion Technology, Inc. Report, October 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, H.B., Chen, J., Hilko, B. et al. Numerical comparison between the ICF and the ICF-spherical pinch. J Fusion Energ 13, 45–58 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214048

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214048

Key Words

Navigation