Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 369–382 | Cite as

Body size influences mating success of the Eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

  • Lawrence M. Hanks
  • Jocelyn G. Millar
  • Timothy D. Paine


Both sexes of adultPhoracantha semipunctata F. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) congregate on stressedEucalyptus that are the larval hosts. In a field study, 721 adultP. semipunctata captured on host trees varied considerably in body size with the largest individuals being about twice the length of the smallest. Females that were paired with a mate were similar in size to solitary females, suggesting that the probability of a female being mated was not affected by her size. However, large males had greater success than smaller males in obtaining mates. MaleP. semipunctata rely on antennal contact to locate and identify females on the larval host. Therefore, the rate at which males search for mates is a function of the area swept by their antennae per unit time. Because of their greater antennal spread, large males were able to search for females at double the rate of the smallest males. Large males also dominated in aggressive contests for females. The superior abilities of large maleP. semipunctata in both locating and defending mates account for the influence of body size on mating success.

Key Words

insect mating body size male competition associative mating Cerambycidae 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcock, J. (1993).Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, J., and Nilssen, A. C. (1983). Intrapopulation size variation of free-living and tree-boring Coleoptera.Can. Entomol. 115: 1453–1464.Google Scholar
  3. Beeson, C. F. C., and Bhatia, B. M. (1939). On the biology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera).Indian For. Rec. Entomol. 5: 1–129.Google Scholar
  4. Burley, N. (1983). The meaning of assortative mating.Ethol. Sociobiol. 4: 191–203.Google Scholar
  5. Chemsak, J. A. (1963). Observations on the adult behavior ofXylotrechus nauticus (Mannerheim).Pan-Pacific Entomol. 39: 213–214.Google Scholar
  6. Dusham, E. H. (1921). The painted hickory borer.Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Stat. Bull. 407.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, O. R., and Linit, M. J. (1991). Oviposition behavior ofMonochamus carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) infested with the pinewood nematode.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84: 319–323.Google Scholar
  8. Goldsmith, S. K. (1987). The mating system and alternative reproductive behaviors ofDendrobius mandibularis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 11–115.Google Scholar
  9. Goldsmith, S. K. (1989). Feeding ecology and the mating system forStenaspis verticalis arizonicus Casey (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 528–533.Google Scholar
  10. Haack, R. A., and Slansky, F., Jr. (1987). Nutritional ecology of wood-feeding Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera. In Slansky, F., Jr., and Rodriguez, J. G. (eds.),Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates, John Wiley, New York, pp. 449–487.Google Scholar
  11. Hanks, L. M., McElfresh, J. S., Millar, J. G., and Paine, T. D. (1993).Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a serious pest ofEucalyptus in California: Biology and laboratoryrearing procedures.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 86–102.Google Scholar
  12. Hanks, L. M., Millar, J. G., and Paine, T. D. (1996). Mating behavior of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the adaptive significance of long “horns.”J. Insect Behav. 9: 383–393.Google Scholar
  13. Hughes, A. L., and Hughes, M. K. (1987). Asymmetric contests among sawyer beetles (Cerambycidae):Monochamus notatus andMonochamus scutellatus).Can. J. Zool. 65: 823–827.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, W. S. (1986). Male choice and competition inTetraopes tetraophthalmus: effects of local sex ratio.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 289–296.Google Scholar
  15. McCauley, D. E. (1982). The behavioral components of sexual selection in the milkweed beetleTetraopes tetraophthalmus.Anim. Behav. 30: 23–28.Google Scholar
  16. Otte, D. (1979). Historical development of sexual selection theory. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.),Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  17. Paine, T. D., Millar, J. G., and Hanks, L. M. (1995). Integrated program protects trees from eucalyptus longhorned borer.Cal. Agr. 49(1): 34–37.Google Scholar
  18. Ridley, M. (1983).The Explanation of Organic Diversity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. SAS Institute (1988).SAS/STAT. User's Guide for Personal Computers. Release 6.03, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  20. Scriven, G. T., Reeves, E. L., and Luck, R. F. (1986). Beetle from Australia threatens Eucalyptus.Calif. Agr. 40(4): 4–6.Google Scholar
  21. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, Freeman Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence M. Hanks
    • 1
  • Jocelyn G. Millar
    • 1
  • Timothy D. Paine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations