Advertisement

Effects of short-term group treatment on rehabilitation outcome of adults with amputations

  • Rosalyn D. Delehanty
  • Luxie Trachsel
Article

Abstract

We explored outcome following a preventive psychoeducational group intervention for patients with amputations using a quasi-experimental design to compare experimental treatment and comparison groups on physical activities and psychological characteristics at 8 months postdischarge. The treatment group (N=20) participated in a minimum of two of three group sessions focused on (a) providing information, (b) anticipating and normalizing future stressors, and (c) building coping strategies. Comparison group participants (N=21) consisted of patients entering the Amputee Program prior to initiation of the group intervention. Treatment group participants showed significantly lower distress levels than comparison group participants, as measured by the SCL-90-R. There was an interaction effect on a second instrument of self-reported stress, with the results indicating that comparison group participants viewed their own stress as significantly greater than that of their spouses, while treatment group members viewed these stress levels as similar. Although treatment group participants consistently reported greater activity levels than did participants in the comparison group, no significant group differences were apparent except for taking holidays. Finally, participating multidisciplinary therapists, as well as patients and family members, rated the clinical relevance of the treatment program.

Key Words

rehabilitation outcome group treatment amputee 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlers, C. (1992). Solution oriented therapy for professionals working with physically impaired clients.J. Strat. Syst. Ther. 11: 53–68.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychol. Rev. 84: 191–215.Google Scholar
  3. Birren, J. E., Sloane, R. B., and Cohen, G. D. (1992).Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, D. J., Turkal, N. W., and Seidl, J. J. (1992). Amputation: Preoperative psychosocial preparation.J. Am. Board Family Pract. 5: 69–73.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, K. M., and Tan, E. S. (1990). Use of lower limb prosthesis among elderly amputees.Ann. Acad. Med. 19: 811–816.Google Scholar
  6. Cyr, J. J., McKenna-Foley, J. M., and Peacock, E. (1985). Factor structure of the SCL-90-R. Is there one?J. Personal. Assess. 49: 571–577.Google Scholar
  7. Delehanty, R. (1986).Multi-modal Evaluation of Preventive Orientation Programs for Adults Entering a Distance University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  8. Derogatis, L. R. (1983).SCL-90-R: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual, Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson, MD.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, T. R., and Gramling, S. E. (1990). Psychologists and rehabilitation: New rules and old training models.Am. Psychol. 45: 762–765.Google Scholar
  10. Frank, R. G., Kashani, J. H., Kashani, S. R., Wonderlich, S. A., and Reid, J. C. (1983). Depression among amputees.J. Clin. Psychiat. 44: 256–258.Google Scholar
  11. Garfield, S. L. (1986). Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In Garfield, S. L., and Bergin, A. E. (eds.),Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 213–256.Google Scholar
  12. Gerhards, F., Florin, I., and Knapp, T. (1984). The impact of medical, re-educational and psychological variables on rehabilitation outcome in amputees.Int. J. Rehab. 4: 379–388.Google Scholar
  13. Hearn, M. T., and Evans, D. R. (1993). Applications of psychology to health care. In Dobson, K., and Dobson, D. (eds.),Professional Psychology in Canada, Hogrefe and Huber, Toronto, pp. 247–284.Google Scholar
  14. Hollandsworth, J. G., Jr. (1985). Counselling psychology, health psychology and beyond: A reply to Klippel and Dejoy.J. Counsel. Psychol. 32: 150–153.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, K. I., Kopta, M., Krause, M. S., and Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy.Am. Psychol. 41: 159–164.Google Scholar
  16. Jamison, R. N., Rock, D. L., and Parris, W. (1988). Empirically derived Symptom Checklist 90 subgroups of chronic pain patients: A cluster analysis.J. Behav. Med. 11: 147–157.Google Scholar
  17. Kazdin, A. E. (1983). Treatment and research: The investigation and evaluation of psychotherapy. In Hersen, M., Kazdin, A. E., and Bellack, A. S. (eds.),The Clinical Psychology Handbook, Pergamon Press, Toronto, pp. 265–284.Google Scholar
  18. Kendall, P. C., and Norton-Ford, J. D. (1982). Therapy outcome research methods. In Kendall, P., and Butcher, J. N. (eds.),Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, pp. 429–459.Google Scholar
  19. Kopel, S., and Arkowitz, H. (1975). The role of attribution and self-perception in behavior change: Implications for behavior therapy.Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 92: 175–212.Google Scholar
  20. Lakin, M. (1989). Group therapies with the elderly: Issues and prospects. In MacLennan, B. W., Saul, S., and Weiner, M. B. (eds.),Group Psychotherapies for the Elderly (American Group Psychotherapy Association Monograph Series, Monograph 5), International Universities Press, Madison, CT, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  21. Leahey, M., and Wright, L. M. (1985). Intervening with families with chronic illness.Family Syst. Med. 3: 60–69.Google Scholar
  22. MacBride, A., Rogers, J., Whylie, B., and Freeman, S. (1990). Psychosocial factors in the rehabilitation of elderly amputees.Psychosomatics 3: 258–265.Google Scholar
  23. Mahoney, M. J. (1974).Cognition and Behavior Modification, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Meehl, P. E. (1989). Law and the fireside inductions (with postscript): Some reflections of a clinical psychologist.Behav. Sci. Law 7: 521–550.Google Scholar
  25. Meichenbaum, D. (1985).Stress Inoculation Training. Pergamon Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  26. Nadler, A. (1983). Personal characteristics and help-seeking. In Nadler, A., Fisher, J. D., and DePaulo B. M. (eds.),New Directions in Helping: Applied Perspectives on Help-Seeking and Receiving, Academic Press, Toronto, pp. 163–185.Google Scholar
  27. Newman, F. L., and Howard, K. I. (1986). Therapeutic effort, treatment outcome, and national health policy.Am. Psychol. 41: 181–187.Google Scholar
  28. Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., and Stegner, B. L. (1983). Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire.Eval. Progr. Plan. 6: 299–314.Google Scholar
  29. Peirce, R. O., Jr., Kernek, C. B., and Ambrose T. A. (1993). The plight of the traumatic amputee.Orthopedics 16(7): 793–797.Google Scholar
  30. Pell, J. P., Donnan, P. T., Fowkes, F. G., and Ruckley, C. V. (1993). Quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease.Eur. J. Vasc. Surg. 7(4): 448–51.Google Scholar
  31. Rodin, J., and Salorey, P. (1989). Health psychology.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 40: 533–79.Google Scholar
  32. Rodin, J., Cashman, C., and Desiderato, L. (1987). Intervention and ageing. Enrichment and prevention. In Riley, M. W., Matarazzo, J., and Baum A. (eds.),Perspectives on Behavioral Medicine: The Aging Dimension, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar
  33. Sarason, S. B. (1980). Individual psychology: An obstacle to comprehending adulthood. In Bond, L. A., and Rosen, J. C. (eds.),Competence and Coping During Adulthood, University Press of New England, Hanover, NH, pp. 6–27.Google Scholar
  34. Schlossberg, N. (1984).Counselling Adults in Transition: Linking Practice with Theory, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Schubert, D. S. P., Burns, R., Paras, W., and Sioson, E. (1992). Decrease of depression during stroke and amputee rehabilitation.Gen. Hosp. Psychiat. 14: 133–141.Google Scholar
  36. Shutty, M. S., Jr., and DeGood, D. E. (1987). Cluster analysis of low-back pain patients to the SCL-90: Comparison of empirical versus rationally derived subscales.Rehab. Psychol. 32: 133–143.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., and Miller T. I. (1980).The Benefits of Psychotherapy, Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore.Google Scholar
  38. Strupp, H. H. (1982). The outcome problem in psychotherapy: Contemporary perspectives.The Master Lecture Series: Psychotherapy research and behavior change, Vol. 1, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 39–71.Google Scholar
  39. Strupp, H. H. (1986). Psychotherapy: Research, practice and public policy (How to avoid dead ends).Am. Psychol. 41: 120–130.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, S. E. (1990). Health psychology the science and the field.Am. Psychol. 45: 40–50.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, D. M., and Haran, D. (1984). Living with an amputation: What it means for patients and their helpers.Int. J. Rehab. Res. 7: 283–292.Google Scholar
  42. Turk, D. C., and Kerns, R. D. (1985). The family in health and illness. In Turk, D. C., and Kerns, R. D. (eds.),Health, Illness, and Families: A Life-Span Perspective, John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  43. Weber, B. (1988). Andre Dubus's hard-luck stories.The New York Times Magazine, Nov. 20, p. 48.Google Scholar
  44. Wells, L. M., Schachter, B., Little, S., Whylie, B., and Balogh, P. A. (1993). Enhancing rehabilitation through mutual aid: Outreach to people with recent amputations.Health Social Work 18: 221–228.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalyn D. Delehanty
    • 1
  • Luxie Trachsel
    • 1
  1. 1.Glenrose Rehabilitation HospitalEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations