Skip to main content
Log in

Singular stationary measures are not always fractal

  • Published:
Journal of Theoretical Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We know of few explicit results to insure that stationary measures are simultaneously (i) singular, (ii) nonatomic, (iii) with interval support, and (iv) unique. Such results would appear useful, to further separate the analytic notion of singular from the geometric notion of fractal. We prove two general theorems, one for maps of [0,1] into [0, 1], the other for 2×2 random matrices. In each setting, we study measures μ supported on two points of the transformation space, and we provide sufficient conditions to insure that the stationary measures satisfy (i)–(iv).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharya, R. N., and Waymire, E. C. (1990).Stochastic Processes with Applications, John Wiley, New York, pp. 214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, G., Michon, G., and Peyriere, J. (1990). On the multifractal analysis of measures. Preprint.

  3. Chernoff, H. (1952). A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations.Ann. Math. Statist. 23, 493–507.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falconer, K. (1990).Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, John Wiley, Chichester, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Furstenberg, H. (1963). Noncommuting random products.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108, 377–428.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Furstenberg, H., and Kesten, H. (1960). Products of random matrices.Ann. Math. Statist. 31, 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grenander, U. (1963).Probabilities on Algebraic Structures, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, T. E. (1956). The existence of stationary measures for certain Markov processes. Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles,Proc. 3rd Berk. Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. 2, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchinson, J. E. (1981). Fractals and self similarity.Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30, 713–747.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Key, E. (1990). Lower bounds for the maximal Lyapunov exponent.J. Theor. Prob. 3, 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977).The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mukherjea, A., and Nakassis, A. (1977). On the limit of the convolution iterates of a probability measure onn x n stochastic matrices.J. Math. Anal. Appl. 60, 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mukherjea, A., and Tserpes, N. (1976).Measures on Topological Semigroups, Lecture Notes in Math. No. 547, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nakassis, A. (1979). Limit behavior of the convolution iterates of a probability measure on a semigroup of matrices.J. Math. Anal. Appl. 70, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Okamoto, M. (1958). Some inequalities relating to the partial sum of binomial probabilities.Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (Tokyo) 10, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peres, Y. (1992). Domains of analytic continuation for the top Lyapunov exponent.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 28, 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pincus, S. M. (1983). A class of Bernoulli random matrices with continuous singular stationary measures.Ann. Prob. 11, 931–938.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pincus, S. M. (1985). Strong laws of large numbers for products of random matrices.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 287, 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenblatt, M. (1971).Markov Processes, Structure and Asymptotic Behavior, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, T.-C. (1986). Random walks on semigroups. Cohen, J. E., Kesten, H., and Newman, C. M. (eds.),Random Matrices and Their Applications, Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 50, American Mathematical Society, pp. 221–239.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pincus, S. Singular stationary measures are not always fractal. J Theor Probab 7, 199–208 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213368

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213368

Key Words

Navigation