Skip to main content
Log in

More about increasing the quality of educational intervention research: A synthesis

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A synthesis of the commentaries to our leadoff paper is presented, along with our replies to some of the specific comments offered. When the original analysis and the commentaries are combined, an exceptionally thorough summary of issues that should be considered by intervention researchers emerges. We hope this set of issues will be useful to the educational research community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almasi, J., Palmer, B. M., Gambrell, L. B., and Pressley, M. (in press). Toward disciplined inquiry: A methodological analysis of whole language research.Educ. Psychol.

  • Bracht, G. H., and Glass, G. V. (1968). The external validity of experiments.Am. Educ. Res. J. 5: 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1966).Experimental and Quasi-Experimental designs for Research. Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), Erlbaum & Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R. (1985). Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues in cognitive-behavioral assessment.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 13: 373–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R. (1988). Learning disabilities research: The need, the integrity, and the challenge.J. Learn. Dis. 21: 267–270, 274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., and Graham, S. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. In Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., and Guthrie, J. T. (eds.),Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy in School. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., and Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction.Except. Children, 57: 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., Mamlin, N., Case, L. P., and Pressley, M. (1993).A Methodological Analysis of Research on the Locus of Control Among Children with Learning Disabilities. University of Maryland, Department of Special Education, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., D'ailly, H., Smith, M., and Cake, H. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction.Reading Res. Quart. 24: 458–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., and Molloy, D. (April 1994).The Influence of Teachers' Beliefs and Knowledge on Strategy Instruction: A Qualitative View. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Marks, M., Pressley, M., Coley, J. D., Craig, S., Gardner, R., Rose, W., and DePinto, T. (1993). Teachers' adaptations of reciprocal teaching: Progress toward a classroom-compatible version of reciprocal teaching.Elem. School J. 94: 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D. L., and Elliott-Faust, D. (1988). What is strategy instructional enrichment and how to study it: Illustrations from research on children's prose memory and comprehension. In Weinert, F., and Perlmutter, M. (eds.),Memory Development: Universal Changes and Individual Development. Erlabaum & Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., and Brown, R. (1992a). Beyond direct explanation: transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies.Elem. School J. 92: 511–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., and Marks, M. B. (1992b). But good strategy instructors are constructivists!!Educ. Psychol. Rev. 4: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Schuder, T., SAIL Faculty and Administration, Bergman, J. L., and El-Dinary, P.B. (1992c). A researcher-educator collaborative interview study of transactional comprehension strategies instruction.J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P., Brown, R., Schuder, T., Pioli, M., Gaskins, I., and Benchmark School Faculty (1994). Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. In Mangieri, J., and Block, C. C. (eds.),Creating Powerful Thinking in Teachers and Students: Diverse Perspectives. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. S., Graham, S., and Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct instruction, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: effects on learning disabled students' composition skills and self-efficacy.J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 340–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., and Pressley, M. (1994).A Theory of Notetaking Derived from Student's Perceptions of Notetaking. Manuscript under publication review, University at Albany, State University of New York, Department of Educational Psychology and Statistics, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A draft of this synthesis was circulated among the commentators in this special issue, with a request to determine whether their views were represented fairly. There were few reservations expressed, and in every case when a concern was expressed, we concluded on review that slight adjustment was required to present the commentator's perspective more clearly and/or fairly, and we attempted to do so.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pressley, M., Harris, K.R. More about increasing the quality of educational intervention research: A synthesis. Educ Psychol Rev 6, 271–289 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213189

Key Words

Navigation