Abstract
In considering the interrelated ethical, legal and social aspects of surrogacy we acknowledge that society has long accepted the delegation of various parental functions and explore the role of a surrogate in relationship to this as well as alluding to commoner comparisons with prostitution and adultery. In particular, the “birth mother” rule, the public antipathy to “commercial” surrogacy and restrictive legislation are explored and found to be inappropriate. It is concluded that the regulation, surveillance and assessment needed to ensure the best outcome for all concerned would perhaps be easiest achieved in programmes that are formally licensed under permissive legislation and adequately funded by “commercial” means.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bromham DR, Bird Stewart J, Stratton PM, Martin Clement N, Jackson JC: Surrogacy—the issues. Univ Leeds Rev 1989;32:161–195
Snowden R: The family and artificial reproduction.In Philosophical Ethics in Reproductive Medicine, DR Bromham, ME Dalton, JC Jackson (eds). Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1990, pp 70–83
Bromham DR: The law, public opinion and reproductive medicine. Br J Family Plan 1988;14:39–40
Bromham DR: Surrogacy—the evolution of opinion. Br J Hosp Med 1992;47:767–772
Warnock M: The new ethical problems in infertility.In Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 6, J Studd (ed). Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp 243–251
Freeman M: Is surrogacy exploitive?In Legal Issues in Human Reproduction, S McLean (ed). Aldershot, Gower Publishing, 1989, pp 164–184
Corea G: The Mother Machine. London, Harper & Row, 1986
Yovich JL, Hoffman TD: (1987) IVF surrogacy and absent uterus syndromes. Lancet 1987;ii:331–332
Bromham DR, Lilford RJ: Autonomy and its limitations in artificial reproduction.In Human Reproduction: Current and Future Ethical Issues, W Walters (ed). London, Bailliere Tindall, 1991, pp 529–550
Bromham DR: Public acceptance of surrogacy: what are the limitations?In The Current Status of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Series, Proceedings of the XIIIth World Congress of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Vol. 1, T Eng-Soon, S Ratnam, M Macnaughton (eds). Carnforth, Parthenon Publishing Group, 1993, pp 305–314
Page E: Taking surrogacy seriously.In Philosophical Ethics in Reproductive Medicine. DR Bromham, ME Dalton, JC Jackson (eds). Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1990, pp 51–69
Brinsden P: IVF surrogacy.In The Bourn Hall Textbook of in Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, P Brinsden, P Rainsbury (eds). Carnforth, Parthenon Publishing Group, 1991, pp 1–5
British Medical Association: Annual Report of Council. Appendix V: Surrogacy report. London, British Medical Association, 1990, pp 39–48
Parker P: Motivation of surrogate mothers: initial findings. Am J Psychiat 1983;140:117–118
Blyth E: “I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say 'I've done something interesting with my life' ”: Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1994;12:189–198
Baxter R, Burke J: Tomorrow's World: The Tools of Change. London, Corgi/Carousel Books, 1974
Warnock M: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London, HMSO, 1984
Morgan D: Surrogacy: an introduction essay.In Birthrights: Law and Ethics at the Beginning of Life, R Lee, D Morgan (eds). London, Routledge, 1989
Cotton K, Winn D: Baby Cotton: For Love and Money. London, Dorling Kindersley, 1985
van Niekerk AA, van Zyl L: The ethics of surrogacy: women's reproductive labour. J Med Ethics (in press)
Thornton JG, McNamara HM, Montague IA: Would you rather be a ‘birth’ or a ‘genetic’ mother? If so how much? J Med Ethics 1994;20:87–92
Blyth E: Section 30—the acceptable face of surrogacy? J Social Welfare Family Law 1993;4:248–260
Blyth E: Children's welfare, surrogacy and social work. Br J Social Work 1993;23:259–275
Hathout H: Perspectives of the middle east.In Ethics and Human Values in Family Planning, Z Bankowski, J Barzellato, A Capron (eds). Geneva, Council for International Organisation in Medical Science, 1989, pp 222–237
Brahams D: The hasty British ban on commercial surrogacy. Hastings Center Report 1987;17:16–19
Erin C, Harris J: Surrogacy.In Human Reproduction: Current and Future Ethical Issues, W Walters (ed). London, Bailliere Tindall, 1991, pp 611–636
Prokopijevic M: Surrogate motherhood. J Appl Philos 1990;7:169–181
Morgan D, Lee R: (1991) Blackstone's Guide to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990—Abortion and Embryo Research—The New Law. London, Blackstone Press, 1991
Freeman M: After Warnock whither the law? Curr Legal Prob 1986;39:33–55
Bromham DR: Should there be limits to IVF? Some public policy viewpoints.In Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S Bewley, RH Ward (eds). London, RCOG Press, 1994, pp 156–171
Mahoney J: Religion and assisted conception.In Philosophical Ethics in Reproductive Medicine. DR Bromham, ME Dalton, JC Jackson (eds). Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1990, pp 84–98