Skip to main content
Log in

Comment and reflection

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Each paper in this section explores aspects of the classroom environment that promote creativity. While the commonalities might appear to end there, there emerges at least one unifying theme. The lesson to be learned is that motivation plays a central role in the creative process. It all boils down to a question of control. Students must be allowed to gain a certain degree of autonomy. Recommendations are offered to teachers wishing to shape a classroom situation conducive to creativity. In addition, suggestions are made as to how my colleagues and I might learn from one another. No single investigative or theoretical orientation can carry the day. Attention must be paid to all aspects of the classroom environment if researchers and educators are to make substantial strides in fostering students' creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. (1983).The Social Psychology of Creativity, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., and Ryan, R. (1985).Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., Nezlek, J., and Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 40: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for Children.Child Devel. 53: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraints on children's creativity while using a computer.Creativity Res. J. 2: 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J., and Gerschner, V. (1982). A review of the literature on attitudes towards computers and computerized instruction.J. Res. Devel. Educ. 16: 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonky, E., and Reihman, J. (September 1980). Cognitive Evaluation Theory, Locus of Control, and Positive Verbal Feedback. Paper presented at a Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.

  • Papert, S. (1980).Mindstorms; Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., and Grolnick, W. (1984). Origins and Pawns in the Classroom: Self-Report and Projective Assessments of Individual Differences in Children's Perceptions. Unpublished manuscrip, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, M., and Baskin, L. (March–April 1983). Computers in the classroom.Childhood Educ. 293–295.

  • Sternberg, R. (1985).Beyond IQ, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, L. (March–April 1983). Parents consider computers the challenge of the 80s.Childhood Educ. 267–270.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hennessey, B.A. Comment and reflection. Educ Psychol Rev 7, 209–213 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212495

Key Words

Navigation