Abstract
Parents and teachers alike have been led to believe that the motivation that stems from wanting to earn a good grade or receive a gold star or do better than the person sitting at the next desk is a positive force. However, in the case of open-ended, creative tasks—tasks for which there is more than one possible solution—extrinsic constraints have frequently proven harmful. A social-psychological approach to the study of creativity is especially useful for answering the question of how best to foster creative behavior in the classroom. Rather than focus on the (largely innate or at least immalleable) differences between creative and uncreative persons, social psychologists concentrate on “creative situations” (i.e., the particular social and environmental conditions that can positively or negatively impact the creativity of most individuals). The present article explored this research tradition and proposed a theoretical explanation for the impact of motivation on creativity that is based upon children's conceptions of work and play.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amabile, T. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 37: 221–233.
Amabile, T. (1982). Children's artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting.Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 8: 573–578.
Amabile, T. (1983a).The Soc. Psychol. Creativity, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Amabile, T. (1983b). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 45: 357–377.
Amabile, T., and Gitomer, J. (1982). Children's Artistic Creativity: Effects ofChoice in Task Materials. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
Amabile, T., and Gryskiewicz, S. (1987).Creativity in the R&D Laboratory. Technical Report Number 30, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
Amabile, T., Goldfarb, P., and Brackfield, S. C. (1982)Effects of Social Facilitation and Evaluation on Creativity. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
Amabile, T., Hennessey, B., and Grossman, B. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 50: 14–23.
Amabile, T., Phillips, E., and Collins, M. (1993). Creativity by contract: Social Influences on the Creativity of Professional Artists. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
Barron, F. (1968).Creativity and Personal Freedom, Van Nostrand, New York.
Berglas, S., Amabile, T., and Handel, M. (1981). Effects of Evaluation on Children's Artistic Creativity. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.
Calder, B., and Staw, B. (1975). Self-perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.J. Person. Soc. Psychol., 31: 599–605.
Campbell, D. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes.Psychol. Rev., 67: 380–400.
Cohen, E., Gelfand, D., and Hartmann, D. (1981). Causal reasoning as a function of behavioral consequences.Child Devel., 52: 514–522.
Crutchfield, R. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In Gruber, H., Terrell, G., and Wertheimer, M. (eds.),Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking. Atherton Press, New York.
Cunningham, B., and Wiegel, J. (1992). Preschool work and play activities: Child and teacher perspectives.Play Culture, 5: 92–99.
Dansky, J., and Silverman, I. (1975). Play: A general facilitator of fluency.Devel. Psychol., 11: 104.
Deci, E. (1975).Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum, New York.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985).Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum, New York.
Dialdin, D. (1993). A Cross-National Examination of the Consensual Assessment Technique. Unpublished manuscript, Wellesley College.
DiVitto, B., and McArthur, L. Z. (1978). Development differences in the use of distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency information for making causal attributions.Devel. Psychol., 14: 474–482.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., and Hays, R. (1978). Equity and intrinsic motivation: The role of choice.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 36: 557–564.
Fryer, M., and Collings, J. (1991a). British teachers' views of creativity.J. Creative Behav. 25: 75.
Fryer, M., and Collings, J. (1991b). Teachers' views about creativity.Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. 61: 207.
Garbarino, J. (1975). The impact of anticipated reward upon cross-age tutoring.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 32: 421–428.
Greene, D. and Lepper, M. (1974). Effects of extrinsic rewards on children's subsequent interest.Child Devel., 45: 1141–1145.
Hall, E. (1987).Growing and Changing: What the Experts Say, Random House, New York.
Hennessey, B., and Amabile, T. (1988). Story-telling: A method for assessing children's creativity.J. Creative Behav. 22: 235–246.
Hennessey, B., and Berger, A. (March, 1933). Children's Conceptions of Work and Play: Exploring an Alternative to Discounting. Poster presented at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Hennessey, B., Amabile, T., and Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward.Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 14: 212–227.
Hennessey, B., and Zbikowski, S. (1993). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation training techniques.Creativity Res. J. 6: 297–307.
Karniol, R., and Ross, M. (1976). The development of causal attributions in social perception.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34: 455–464.
Karniol, R., and Ross, M. (1979). Children's use of a causal attribution schema and the inference of manipulative intentions.Child Devel. 50: 463–468.
Kassin, S., and Ellis, S. (1988). On the acquisition of the discounting principle: An experimental test of a social-developmental model.Child Devel. 59: 950–960.
Kassin, S., and Gibbons, F. (1981). Children's use of the discounting principle in their perceptions of exertion.Child Devel. 52: 741–744.
Kassin, S., Gibbons, F., and Lowe, C. (1980). Children's use of the discounting principle: A perceptual approach.J. of Person. Soc. Psychol. 39: 719–728.
Kelley, H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution.Am. Psychol. 28: 107–128.
Kernoodle-Loveland, K. and Olley, J. (1979). The effect of external reward on interest and quality of task performance in children of high and low intrinsic motivation.Child Devel. 50: 1207–1210.
King, N. (1982). Children's conceptions of work and play.Soc. Educ. 46: 110–113.
Koestner, R., Ryan, R., Bernieri, F., and Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children's behavio The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity.J. Person. 52: 233–248.
Kruglanski, A. (1975). The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory.Psychol. Rev. 82: 387–406.
Kruglanski, A., Friedman, I., and Zeevi, G. (1971). The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance.J. Person. 39: 606–617.
Lepper, M., and Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 31: 479–486.
Lepper, M., and Greene, D. (eds.). (1978).The Hidden Costs of Reward, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Lepper, M., Greene, D., and Nisbett, R. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 28: 129–137.
Lieberman, J. (1965). Playfulness and divergent thinking: An investigation of their relationship at the kindergarten level.J. Gen. Psychol. 107: 219–224.
Morgan, M. (1981). The overjustification effect: A developmental test of self-perception interpretations.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 40: 809–821.
Newman, L., and Ruble, D. (1992). Do young children use the discounting principle?J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28: 572–593.
Peterson, L., and Gelfand, D. (1984). Causal attributions of helping as a function of age and incentives.Child Devel. 55: 504–511.
Pittman, T., Emery, J., and Boggiano, A. (1982). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Reward-induced changes in preference for complexity.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 42: 789–797.
Ransen, D. (1980). The mediation of reward-induced motivation decrements in early and middle childhood: A template matching approach.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 35: 49–55.
Ross, M. (1975). Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 32: 245–254.
Shapira, Z. (1976). Expectancy determinants of intrinsically motivated behavior.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 39: 1235–1244.
Shultz, T., and Butkowsky, I. (1977). Young children's use of the scheme for multiple sufficient causes in the attribution of real and hypothetical behavior.Child Devel. 48: 464–469.
Shultz, T., Butkowsky, I., Pearce, J. and Shanfield, H. (1975). The development of schemes for the attribution of multiple psychological causes.Devel. Psychol. 11: 502–510.
Smith, M. (1975). Children's use of the multiple sufficient cause schema in social perception.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 32: 737–747.
Stein, M. (1974 and 1975).Stimulating Creativity (Vols. 1 and 2), Academic Press, New York.
Tucker, J. (1980). The Concepts of and the Attitudes Toward Work and Play in Children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1979).Dissertation Abst. Int. 40: 3987B.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hennessey, B.A. Social, environmental, and developmental issues and creativity. Educ Psychol Rev 7, 163–183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212492
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212492