Skip to main content
Log in

Social, environmental, and developmental issues and creativity

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parents and teachers alike have been led to believe that the motivation that stems from wanting to earn a good grade or receive a gold star or do better than the person sitting at the next desk is a positive force. However, in the case of open-ended, creative tasks—tasks for which there is more than one possible solution—extrinsic constraints have frequently proven harmful. A social-psychological approach to the study of creativity is especially useful for answering the question of how best to foster creative behavior in the classroom. Rather than focus on the (largely innate or at least immalleable) differences between creative and uncreative persons, social psychologists concentrate on “creative situations” (i.e., the particular social and environmental conditions that can positively or negatively impact the creativity of most individuals). The present article explored this research tradition and proposed a theoretical explanation for the impact of motivation on creativity that is based upon children's conceptions of work and play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 37: 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1982). Children's artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting.Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 8: 573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1983a).The Soc. Psychol. Creativity, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1983b). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 45: 357–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., and Gitomer, J. (1982). Children's Artistic Creativity: Effects ofChoice in Task Materials. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.

  • Amabile, T., and Gryskiewicz, S. (1987).Creativity in the R&D Laboratory. Technical Report Number 30, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., Goldfarb, P., and Brackfield, S. C. (1982)Effects of Social Facilitation and Evaluation on Creativity. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.

  • Amabile, T., Hennessey, B., and Grossman, B. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 50: 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., Phillips, E., and Collins, M. (1993). Creativity by contract: Social Influences on the Creativity of Professional Artists. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.

  • Barron, F. (1968).Creativity and Personal Freedom, Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S., Amabile, T., and Handel, M. (1981). Effects of Evaluation on Children's Artistic Creativity. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University.

  • Calder, B., and Staw, B. (1975). Self-perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.J. Person. Soc. Psychol., 31: 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes.Psychol. Rev., 67: 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., Gelfand, D., and Hartmann, D. (1981). Causal reasoning as a function of behavioral consequences.Child Devel., 52: 514–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, R. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In Gruber, H., Terrell, G., and Wertheimer, M. (eds.),Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking. Atherton Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, B., and Wiegel, J. (1992). Preschool work and play activities: Child and teacher perspectives.Play Culture, 5: 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansky, J., and Silverman, I. (1975). Play: A general facilitator of fluency.Devel. Psychol., 11: 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. (1975).Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985).Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dialdin, D. (1993). A Cross-National Examination of the Consensual Assessment Technique. Unpublished manuscript, Wellesley College.

  • DiVitto, B., and McArthur, L. Z. (1978). Development differences in the use of distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency information for making causal attributions.Devel. Psychol., 14: 474–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., and Hays, R. (1978). Equity and intrinsic motivation: The role of choice.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 36: 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, M., and Collings, J. (1991a). British teachers' views of creativity.J. Creative Behav. 25: 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, M., and Collings, J. (1991b). Teachers' views about creativity.Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. 61: 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1975). The impact of anticipated reward upon cross-age tutoring.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 32: 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D. and Lepper, M. (1974). Effects of extrinsic rewards on children's subsequent interest.Child Devel., 45: 1141–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1987).Growing and Changing: What the Experts Say, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B., and Amabile, T. (1988). Story-telling: A method for assessing children's creativity.J. Creative Behav. 22: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B., and Berger, A. (March, 1933). Children's Conceptions of Work and Play: Exploring an Alternative to Discounting. Poster presented at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Hennessey, B., Amabile, T., and Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward.Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 14: 212–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B., and Zbikowski, S. (1993). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation training techniques.Creativity Res. J. 6: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniol, R., and Ross, M. (1976). The development of causal attributions in social perception.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34: 455–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniol, R., and Ross, M. (1979). Children's use of a causal attribution schema and the inference of manipulative intentions.Child Devel. 50: 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., and Ellis, S. (1988). On the acquisition of the discounting principle: An experimental test of a social-developmental model.Child Devel. 59: 950–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., and Gibbons, F. (1981). Children's use of the discounting principle in their perceptions of exertion.Child Devel. 52: 741–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., Gibbons, F., and Lowe, C. (1980). Children's use of the discounting principle: A perceptual approach.J. of Person. Soc. Psychol. 39: 719–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution.Am. Psychol. 28: 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernoodle-Loveland, K. and Olley, J. (1979). The effect of external reward on interest and quality of task performance in children of high and low intrinsic motivation.Child Devel. 50: 1207–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (1982). Children's conceptions of work and play.Soc. Educ. 46: 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Ryan, R., Bernieri, F., and Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children's behavio The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity.J. Person. 52: 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. (1975). The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory.Psychol. Rev. 82: 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A., Friedman, I., and Zeevi, G. (1971). The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance.J. Person. 39: 606–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M., and Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 31: 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M., and Greene, D. (eds.). (1978).The Hidden Costs of Reward, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M., Greene, D., and Nisbett, R. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 28: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, J. (1965). Playfulness and divergent thinking: An investigation of their relationship at the kindergarten level.J. Gen. Psychol. 107: 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1981). The overjustification effect: A developmental test of self-perception interpretations.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 40: 809–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L., and Ruble, D. (1992). Do young children use the discounting principle?J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28: 572–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L., and Gelfand, D. (1984). Causal attributions of helping as a function of age and incentives.Child Devel. 55: 504–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, T., Emery, J., and Boggiano, A. (1982). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Reward-induced changes in preference for complexity.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 42: 789–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransen, D. (1980). The mediation of reward-induced motivation decrements in early and middle childhood: A template matching approach.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 35: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1975). Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 32: 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Z. (1976). Expectancy determinants of intrinsically motivated behavior.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 39: 1235–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, T., and Butkowsky, I. (1977). Young children's use of the scheme for multiple sufficient causes in the attribution of real and hypothetical behavior.Child Devel. 48: 464–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, T., Butkowsky, I., Pearce, J. and Shanfield, H. (1975). The development of schemes for the attribution of multiple psychological causes.Devel. Psychol. 11: 502–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1975). Children's use of the multiple sufficient cause schema in social perception.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 32: 737–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (1974 and 1975).Stimulating Creativity (Vols. 1 and 2), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. (1980). The Concepts of and the Attitudes Toward Work and Play in Children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1979).Dissertation Abst. Int. 40: 3987B.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hennessey, B.A. Social, environmental, and developmental issues and creativity. Educ Psychol Rev 7, 163–183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212492

Key Words

Navigation